Cargando…
A new tool to measure approaches to supervision from the perspective of community health workers: a prospective, longitudinal, validation study in seven countries
BACKGROUND: The global scale-up of community health workers (CHWs) depends on supportive management and supervision of this expanding cadre. Existing tools fail to incorporate the perspective of the CHW (i.e. perceived supervision) in terms of supportive experiences with their supervisor. Aligned to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30348147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3595-7 |
_version_ | 1783364566398271488 |
---|---|
author | Vallières, Frédérique Hyland, Philip McAuliffe, Eilish Mahmud, Ilias Tulloch, Olivia Walker, Polly Taegtmeyer, Miriam |
author_facet | Vallières, Frédérique Hyland, Philip McAuliffe, Eilish Mahmud, Ilias Tulloch, Olivia Walker, Polly Taegtmeyer, Miriam |
author_sort | Vallières, Frédérique |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The global scale-up of community health workers (CHWs) depends on supportive management and supervision of this expanding cadre. Existing tools fail to incorporate the perspective of the CHW (i.e. perceived supervision) in terms of supportive experiences with their supervisor. Aligned to the WHO’s strategy on human resources for health, we developed and validated a simple tool to measure perceived supervision across seven low and middle-income countries. METHODS: Phase 1 was carried out with 327 CHWs in Sierra Leone. Twelve questions, informed by the extant literature on health worker supervision, were reduced to six questions using confirmatory factor analysis. Phase 2 employed structural equation modelling with 741 CHWs in six countries (Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique), to assess the factorial validity, predictive validity, and internal reliability of the questions at three time-points, over 8-months. RESULTS: We developed a robust, 6-item measure of perceived supervision (PSS), capturing regular contact, two-way communication, and joint problem-solving elements as being critical from the perspective of CHWs. When assessed across the six countries, over time, the PSS was also found to have good validity and internal reliability. PSS scores at baseline positively and significantly predicted a range of performance-related outcomes at follow-up. CONCLUSION: The PSS is the first validated tool that measures supervisory experience from the perspective of CHWs and is applicable across multiple, culturally-distinct global health contexts with a wide range of CHW typologies. Simple, quick to administer, and freely available in 11 languages, the PSS could assist practitioners in the management of community health programmes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3595-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6196473 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61964732018-10-30 A new tool to measure approaches to supervision from the perspective of community health workers: a prospective, longitudinal, validation study in seven countries Vallières, Frédérique Hyland, Philip McAuliffe, Eilish Mahmud, Ilias Tulloch, Olivia Walker, Polly Taegtmeyer, Miriam BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The global scale-up of community health workers (CHWs) depends on supportive management and supervision of this expanding cadre. Existing tools fail to incorporate the perspective of the CHW (i.e. perceived supervision) in terms of supportive experiences with their supervisor. Aligned to the WHO’s strategy on human resources for health, we developed and validated a simple tool to measure perceived supervision across seven low and middle-income countries. METHODS: Phase 1 was carried out with 327 CHWs in Sierra Leone. Twelve questions, informed by the extant literature on health worker supervision, were reduced to six questions using confirmatory factor analysis. Phase 2 employed structural equation modelling with 741 CHWs in six countries (Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique), to assess the factorial validity, predictive validity, and internal reliability of the questions at three time-points, over 8-months. RESULTS: We developed a robust, 6-item measure of perceived supervision (PSS), capturing regular contact, two-way communication, and joint problem-solving elements as being critical from the perspective of CHWs. When assessed across the six countries, over time, the PSS was also found to have good validity and internal reliability. PSS scores at baseline positively and significantly predicted a range of performance-related outcomes at follow-up. CONCLUSION: The PSS is the first validated tool that measures supervisory experience from the perspective of CHWs and is applicable across multiple, culturally-distinct global health contexts with a wide range of CHW typologies. Simple, quick to administer, and freely available in 11 languages, the PSS could assist practitioners in the management of community health programmes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3595-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6196473/ /pubmed/30348147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3595-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vallières, Frédérique Hyland, Philip McAuliffe, Eilish Mahmud, Ilias Tulloch, Olivia Walker, Polly Taegtmeyer, Miriam A new tool to measure approaches to supervision from the perspective of community health workers: a prospective, longitudinal, validation study in seven countries |
title | A new tool to measure approaches to supervision from the perspective of community health workers: a prospective, longitudinal, validation study in seven countries |
title_full | A new tool to measure approaches to supervision from the perspective of community health workers: a prospective, longitudinal, validation study in seven countries |
title_fullStr | A new tool to measure approaches to supervision from the perspective of community health workers: a prospective, longitudinal, validation study in seven countries |
title_full_unstemmed | A new tool to measure approaches to supervision from the perspective of community health workers: a prospective, longitudinal, validation study in seven countries |
title_short | A new tool to measure approaches to supervision from the perspective of community health workers: a prospective, longitudinal, validation study in seven countries |
title_sort | new tool to measure approaches to supervision from the perspective of community health workers: a prospective, longitudinal, validation study in seven countries |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30348147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3595-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vallieresfrederique anewtooltomeasureapproachestosupervisionfromtheperspectiveofcommunityhealthworkersaprospectivelongitudinalvalidationstudyinsevencountries AT hylandphilip anewtooltomeasureapproachestosupervisionfromtheperspectiveofcommunityhealthworkersaprospectivelongitudinalvalidationstudyinsevencountries AT mcauliffeeilish anewtooltomeasureapproachestosupervisionfromtheperspectiveofcommunityhealthworkersaprospectivelongitudinalvalidationstudyinsevencountries AT mahmudilias anewtooltomeasureapproachestosupervisionfromtheperspectiveofcommunityhealthworkersaprospectivelongitudinalvalidationstudyinsevencountries AT tullocholivia anewtooltomeasureapproachestosupervisionfromtheperspectiveofcommunityhealthworkersaprospectivelongitudinalvalidationstudyinsevencountries AT walkerpolly anewtooltomeasureapproachestosupervisionfromtheperspectiveofcommunityhealthworkersaprospectivelongitudinalvalidationstudyinsevencountries AT taegtmeyermiriam anewtooltomeasureapproachestosupervisionfromtheperspectiveofcommunityhealthworkersaprospectivelongitudinalvalidationstudyinsevencountries AT vallieresfrederique newtooltomeasureapproachestosupervisionfromtheperspectiveofcommunityhealthworkersaprospectivelongitudinalvalidationstudyinsevencountries AT hylandphilip newtooltomeasureapproachestosupervisionfromtheperspectiveofcommunityhealthworkersaprospectivelongitudinalvalidationstudyinsevencountries AT mcauliffeeilish newtooltomeasureapproachestosupervisionfromtheperspectiveofcommunityhealthworkersaprospectivelongitudinalvalidationstudyinsevencountries AT mahmudilias newtooltomeasureapproachestosupervisionfromtheperspectiveofcommunityhealthworkersaprospectivelongitudinalvalidationstudyinsevencountries AT tullocholivia newtooltomeasureapproachestosupervisionfromtheperspectiveofcommunityhealthworkersaprospectivelongitudinalvalidationstudyinsevencountries AT walkerpolly newtooltomeasureapproachestosupervisionfromtheperspectiveofcommunityhealthworkersaprospectivelongitudinalvalidationstudyinsevencountries AT taegtmeyermiriam newtooltomeasureapproachestosupervisionfromtheperspectiveofcommunityhealthworkersaprospectivelongitudinalvalidationstudyinsevencountries |