Cargando…

A new tool to measure approaches to supervision from the perspective of community health workers: a prospective, longitudinal, validation study in seven countries

BACKGROUND: The global scale-up of community health workers (CHWs) depends on supportive management and supervision of this expanding cadre. Existing tools fail to incorporate the perspective of the CHW (i.e. perceived supervision) in terms of supportive experiences with their supervisor. Aligned to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vallières, Frédérique, Hyland, Philip, McAuliffe, Eilish, Mahmud, Ilias, Tulloch, Olivia, Walker, Polly, Taegtmeyer, Miriam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30348147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3595-7
_version_ 1783364566398271488
author Vallières, Frédérique
Hyland, Philip
McAuliffe, Eilish
Mahmud, Ilias
Tulloch, Olivia
Walker, Polly
Taegtmeyer, Miriam
author_facet Vallières, Frédérique
Hyland, Philip
McAuliffe, Eilish
Mahmud, Ilias
Tulloch, Olivia
Walker, Polly
Taegtmeyer, Miriam
author_sort Vallières, Frédérique
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The global scale-up of community health workers (CHWs) depends on supportive management and supervision of this expanding cadre. Existing tools fail to incorporate the perspective of the CHW (i.e. perceived supervision) in terms of supportive experiences with their supervisor. Aligned to the WHO’s strategy on human resources for health, we developed and validated a simple tool to measure perceived supervision across seven low and middle-income countries. METHODS: Phase 1 was carried out with 327 CHWs in Sierra Leone. Twelve questions, informed by the extant literature on health worker supervision, were reduced to six questions using confirmatory factor analysis. Phase 2 employed structural equation modelling with 741 CHWs in six countries (Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique), to assess the factorial validity, predictive validity, and internal reliability of the questions at three time-points, over 8-months. RESULTS: We developed a robust, 6-item measure of perceived supervision (PSS), capturing regular contact, two-way communication, and joint problem-solving elements as being critical from the perspective of CHWs. When assessed across the six countries, over time, the PSS was also found to have good validity and internal reliability. PSS scores at baseline positively and significantly predicted a range of performance-related outcomes at follow-up. CONCLUSION: The PSS is the first validated tool that measures supervisory experience from the perspective of CHWs and is applicable across multiple, culturally-distinct global health contexts with a wide range of CHW typologies. Simple, quick to administer, and freely available in 11 languages, the PSS could assist practitioners in the management of community health programmes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3595-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6196473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61964732018-10-30 A new tool to measure approaches to supervision from the perspective of community health workers: a prospective, longitudinal, validation study in seven countries Vallières, Frédérique Hyland, Philip McAuliffe, Eilish Mahmud, Ilias Tulloch, Olivia Walker, Polly Taegtmeyer, Miriam BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The global scale-up of community health workers (CHWs) depends on supportive management and supervision of this expanding cadre. Existing tools fail to incorporate the perspective of the CHW (i.e. perceived supervision) in terms of supportive experiences with their supervisor. Aligned to the WHO’s strategy on human resources for health, we developed and validated a simple tool to measure perceived supervision across seven low and middle-income countries. METHODS: Phase 1 was carried out with 327 CHWs in Sierra Leone. Twelve questions, informed by the extant literature on health worker supervision, were reduced to six questions using confirmatory factor analysis. Phase 2 employed structural equation modelling with 741 CHWs in six countries (Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique), to assess the factorial validity, predictive validity, and internal reliability of the questions at three time-points, over 8-months. RESULTS: We developed a robust, 6-item measure of perceived supervision (PSS), capturing regular contact, two-way communication, and joint problem-solving elements as being critical from the perspective of CHWs. When assessed across the six countries, over time, the PSS was also found to have good validity and internal reliability. PSS scores at baseline positively and significantly predicted a range of performance-related outcomes at follow-up. CONCLUSION: The PSS is the first validated tool that measures supervisory experience from the perspective of CHWs and is applicable across multiple, culturally-distinct global health contexts with a wide range of CHW typologies. Simple, quick to administer, and freely available in 11 languages, the PSS could assist practitioners in the management of community health programmes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3595-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6196473/ /pubmed/30348147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3595-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vallières, Frédérique
Hyland, Philip
McAuliffe, Eilish
Mahmud, Ilias
Tulloch, Olivia
Walker, Polly
Taegtmeyer, Miriam
A new tool to measure approaches to supervision from the perspective of community health workers: a prospective, longitudinal, validation study in seven countries
title A new tool to measure approaches to supervision from the perspective of community health workers: a prospective, longitudinal, validation study in seven countries
title_full A new tool to measure approaches to supervision from the perspective of community health workers: a prospective, longitudinal, validation study in seven countries
title_fullStr A new tool to measure approaches to supervision from the perspective of community health workers: a prospective, longitudinal, validation study in seven countries
title_full_unstemmed A new tool to measure approaches to supervision from the perspective of community health workers: a prospective, longitudinal, validation study in seven countries
title_short A new tool to measure approaches to supervision from the perspective of community health workers: a prospective, longitudinal, validation study in seven countries
title_sort new tool to measure approaches to supervision from the perspective of community health workers: a prospective, longitudinal, validation study in seven countries
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30348147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3595-7
work_keys_str_mv AT vallieresfrederique anewtooltomeasureapproachestosupervisionfromtheperspectiveofcommunityhealthworkersaprospectivelongitudinalvalidationstudyinsevencountries
AT hylandphilip anewtooltomeasureapproachestosupervisionfromtheperspectiveofcommunityhealthworkersaprospectivelongitudinalvalidationstudyinsevencountries
AT mcauliffeeilish anewtooltomeasureapproachestosupervisionfromtheperspectiveofcommunityhealthworkersaprospectivelongitudinalvalidationstudyinsevencountries
AT mahmudilias anewtooltomeasureapproachestosupervisionfromtheperspectiveofcommunityhealthworkersaprospectivelongitudinalvalidationstudyinsevencountries
AT tullocholivia anewtooltomeasureapproachestosupervisionfromtheperspectiveofcommunityhealthworkersaprospectivelongitudinalvalidationstudyinsevencountries
AT walkerpolly anewtooltomeasureapproachestosupervisionfromtheperspectiveofcommunityhealthworkersaprospectivelongitudinalvalidationstudyinsevencountries
AT taegtmeyermiriam anewtooltomeasureapproachestosupervisionfromtheperspectiveofcommunityhealthworkersaprospectivelongitudinalvalidationstudyinsevencountries
AT vallieresfrederique newtooltomeasureapproachestosupervisionfromtheperspectiveofcommunityhealthworkersaprospectivelongitudinalvalidationstudyinsevencountries
AT hylandphilip newtooltomeasureapproachestosupervisionfromtheperspectiveofcommunityhealthworkersaprospectivelongitudinalvalidationstudyinsevencountries
AT mcauliffeeilish newtooltomeasureapproachestosupervisionfromtheperspectiveofcommunityhealthworkersaprospectivelongitudinalvalidationstudyinsevencountries
AT mahmudilias newtooltomeasureapproachestosupervisionfromtheperspectiveofcommunityhealthworkersaprospectivelongitudinalvalidationstudyinsevencountries
AT tullocholivia newtooltomeasureapproachestosupervisionfromtheperspectiveofcommunityhealthworkersaprospectivelongitudinalvalidationstudyinsevencountries
AT walkerpolly newtooltomeasureapproachestosupervisionfromtheperspectiveofcommunityhealthworkersaprospectivelongitudinalvalidationstudyinsevencountries
AT taegtmeyermiriam newtooltomeasureapproachestosupervisionfromtheperspectiveofcommunityhealthworkersaprospectivelongitudinalvalidationstudyinsevencountries