Cargando…

Protocol for a multicentre, prospective cohort study of practice patterns and clinical outcomes associated with emergency department sedation for mechanically ventilated patients: the ED-SED Study

INTRODUCTION: In mechanically ventilated patients, sedation strategies are a major determinant of outcome. The emergency department (ED) is the earliest exposure to mechanical ventilation for hundreds of thousands of patients annually in the USA. The one retrospective study that exists regarding ED...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fuller, Brian M, Mohr, Nicholas M, Roberts, Brian W, Carpenter, Christopher R, Kollef, Marin H, Avidan, Michael S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30344178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023423
_version_ 1783364628994064384
author Fuller, Brian M
Mohr, Nicholas M
Roberts, Brian W
Carpenter, Christopher R
Kollef, Marin H
Avidan, Michael S
author_facet Fuller, Brian M
Mohr, Nicholas M
Roberts, Brian W
Carpenter, Christopher R
Kollef, Marin H
Avidan, Michael S
author_sort Fuller, Brian M
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In mechanically ventilated patients, sedation strategies are a major determinant of outcome. The emergency department (ED) is the earliest exposure to mechanical ventilation for hundreds of thousands of patients annually in the USA. The one retrospective study that exists regarding ED sedation for mechanically ventilated patients showed a strong association between deep sedation in the ED and worse clinical outcomes. This finding suggests that the ED may be an optimal location to study the impact of early sedation on outcome, yet a lack of prospective studies represents a knowledge gap in this arena. This protocol describes a prospective observational study aimed at further characterising ED sedation practices and assessing the relationship between ED sedation and clinical outcomes. An association between ED sedation and clinical outcomes across multiple sites would suggest the need for changes in the current sedation strategies used in the ED, and provide evidence for future interventional studies in this field. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, prospective cohort study testing the hypothesis that deep sedation in the ED is associated with worse clinical outcomes. A cohort of over 300 mechanically ventilated ED patients will be included. The primary outcome is ventilator-free days, and secondary outcomes include hospital mortality, incidence of acute brain dysfunction and lengths of stay. Multivariable linear regression will test the hypothesis that deep sedation in the ED is associated with a decrease in ventilator-free days. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval of the study by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at each participating site has been obtained prior to data collection on the first patient. This work will be disseminated by publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts, presentation in abstract form at scientific meetings and data sharing with other investigators through academically established means.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6196824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61968242018-10-25 Protocol for a multicentre, prospective cohort study of practice patterns and clinical outcomes associated with emergency department sedation for mechanically ventilated patients: the ED-SED Study Fuller, Brian M Mohr, Nicholas M Roberts, Brian W Carpenter, Christopher R Kollef, Marin H Avidan, Michael S BMJ Open Intensive Care INTRODUCTION: In mechanically ventilated patients, sedation strategies are a major determinant of outcome. The emergency department (ED) is the earliest exposure to mechanical ventilation for hundreds of thousands of patients annually in the USA. The one retrospective study that exists regarding ED sedation for mechanically ventilated patients showed a strong association between deep sedation in the ED and worse clinical outcomes. This finding suggests that the ED may be an optimal location to study the impact of early sedation on outcome, yet a lack of prospective studies represents a knowledge gap in this arena. This protocol describes a prospective observational study aimed at further characterising ED sedation practices and assessing the relationship between ED sedation and clinical outcomes. An association between ED sedation and clinical outcomes across multiple sites would suggest the need for changes in the current sedation strategies used in the ED, and provide evidence for future interventional studies in this field. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, prospective cohort study testing the hypothesis that deep sedation in the ED is associated with worse clinical outcomes. A cohort of over 300 mechanically ventilated ED patients will be included. The primary outcome is ventilator-free days, and secondary outcomes include hospital mortality, incidence of acute brain dysfunction and lengths of stay. Multivariable linear regression will test the hypothesis that deep sedation in the ED is associated with a decrease in ventilator-free days. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval of the study by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at each participating site has been obtained prior to data collection on the first patient. This work will be disseminated by publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts, presentation in abstract form at scientific meetings and data sharing with other investigators through academically established means. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6196824/ /pubmed/30344178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023423 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Intensive Care
Fuller, Brian M
Mohr, Nicholas M
Roberts, Brian W
Carpenter, Christopher R
Kollef, Marin H
Avidan, Michael S
Protocol for a multicentre, prospective cohort study of practice patterns and clinical outcomes associated with emergency department sedation for mechanically ventilated patients: the ED-SED Study
title Protocol for a multicentre, prospective cohort study of practice patterns and clinical outcomes associated with emergency department sedation for mechanically ventilated patients: the ED-SED Study
title_full Protocol for a multicentre, prospective cohort study of practice patterns and clinical outcomes associated with emergency department sedation for mechanically ventilated patients: the ED-SED Study
title_fullStr Protocol for a multicentre, prospective cohort study of practice patterns and clinical outcomes associated with emergency department sedation for mechanically ventilated patients: the ED-SED Study
title_full_unstemmed Protocol for a multicentre, prospective cohort study of practice patterns and clinical outcomes associated with emergency department sedation for mechanically ventilated patients: the ED-SED Study
title_short Protocol for a multicentre, prospective cohort study of practice patterns and clinical outcomes associated with emergency department sedation for mechanically ventilated patients: the ED-SED Study
title_sort protocol for a multicentre, prospective cohort study of practice patterns and clinical outcomes associated with emergency department sedation for mechanically ventilated patients: the ed-sed study
topic Intensive Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30344178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023423
work_keys_str_mv AT fullerbrianm protocolforamulticentreprospectivecohortstudyofpracticepatternsandclinicaloutcomesassociatedwithemergencydepartmentsedationformechanicallyventilatedpatientstheedsedstudy
AT mohrnicholasm protocolforamulticentreprospectivecohortstudyofpracticepatternsandclinicaloutcomesassociatedwithemergencydepartmentsedationformechanicallyventilatedpatientstheedsedstudy
AT robertsbrianw protocolforamulticentreprospectivecohortstudyofpracticepatternsandclinicaloutcomesassociatedwithemergencydepartmentsedationformechanicallyventilatedpatientstheedsedstudy
AT carpenterchristopherr protocolforamulticentreprospectivecohortstudyofpracticepatternsandclinicaloutcomesassociatedwithemergencydepartmentsedationformechanicallyventilatedpatientstheedsedstudy
AT kollefmarinh protocolforamulticentreprospectivecohortstudyofpracticepatternsandclinicaloutcomesassociatedwithemergencydepartmentsedationformechanicallyventilatedpatientstheedsedstudy
AT avidanmichaels protocolforamulticentreprospectivecohortstudyofpracticepatternsandclinicaloutcomesassociatedwithemergencydepartmentsedationformechanicallyventilatedpatientstheedsedstudy