Cargando…

How much evidence is there that political factors are related to population health outcomes? An internationally comparative systematic review

OBJECTIVES: To provide a 7-year update of the most recent systematic review about the relationships between political features and population health outcomes. SETTING: Internationally comparative scholarly literature. DATA SOURCES: Ten scholarly bibliographic databases plus supplementary searches in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barnish, Max, Tørnes, Michelle, Nelson-Horne, Becky
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30341112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020886
_version_ 1783364636554297344
author Barnish, Max
Tørnes, Michelle
Nelson-Horne, Becky
author_facet Barnish, Max
Tørnes, Michelle
Nelson-Horne, Becky
author_sort Barnish, Max
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To provide a 7-year update of the most recent systematic review about the relationships between political features and population health outcomes. SETTING: Internationally comparative scholarly literature. DATA SOURCES: Ten scholarly bibliographic databases plus supplementary searches in bibliographies and Google Scholar were used to update a previous systematic review. The final search was conducted in November 2017. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Any population health outcome measure, apart from healthcare spending. RESULTS: 73 unique publications were identified from the previous systematic review. The database searches to update the literature identified 45 356 raw records with 35 207 remaining following de-duplication. 55 publications were identified from supplementary searches. In total, 258 publications proceeded to full-text review and 176 were included in narrative synthesis. 85 studies were assessed at low risk of bias, 89 at moderate risk of bias and none at high risk of bias. Assessment could not be conducted for two studies that had only book chapters. No meta-analysis was conducted. 102 studies assessed welfare state generosity and 79 found a positive association. Of the 17 studies that assessed political tradition, 15 were found to show a positive association with the left-of-centre tradition. 44 studies assessed democracy and 34 found a positive association. 28 studies assessed globalisation and 14 found a negative association, while seven were positive and seven inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: This review concludes that welfare state generosity, left-of-centre democratic political tradition and democracy are generally positively associated with population health. Globalisation may be negatively associated with population health, but the results are less conclusive. It is important for the academic public health community to engage with the political evidence base in its research as well as in stakeholder engagement, in order to facilitate positive outcomes for population health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6196855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61968552018-10-25 How much evidence is there that political factors are related to population health outcomes? An internationally comparative systematic review Barnish, Max Tørnes, Michelle Nelson-Horne, Becky BMJ Open Health Policy OBJECTIVES: To provide a 7-year update of the most recent systematic review about the relationships between political features and population health outcomes. SETTING: Internationally comparative scholarly literature. DATA SOURCES: Ten scholarly bibliographic databases plus supplementary searches in bibliographies and Google Scholar were used to update a previous systematic review. The final search was conducted in November 2017. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Any population health outcome measure, apart from healthcare spending. RESULTS: 73 unique publications were identified from the previous systematic review. The database searches to update the literature identified 45 356 raw records with 35 207 remaining following de-duplication. 55 publications were identified from supplementary searches. In total, 258 publications proceeded to full-text review and 176 were included in narrative synthesis. 85 studies were assessed at low risk of bias, 89 at moderate risk of bias and none at high risk of bias. Assessment could not be conducted for two studies that had only book chapters. No meta-analysis was conducted. 102 studies assessed welfare state generosity and 79 found a positive association. Of the 17 studies that assessed political tradition, 15 were found to show a positive association with the left-of-centre tradition. 44 studies assessed democracy and 34 found a positive association. 28 studies assessed globalisation and 14 found a negative association, while seven were positive and seven inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: This review concludes that welfare state generosity, left-of-centre democratic political tradition and democracy are generally positively associated with population health. Globalisation may be negatively associated with population health, but the results are less conclusive. It is important for the academic public health community to engage with the political evidence base in its research as well as in stakeholder engagement, in order to facilitate positive outcomes for population health. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6196855/ /pubmed/30341112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020886 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Policy
Barnish, Max
Tørnes, Michelle
Nelson-Horne, Becky
How much evidence is there that political factors are related to population health outcomes? An internationally comparative systematic review
title How much evidence is there that political factors are related to population health outcomes? An internationally comparative systematic review
title_full How much evidence is there that political factors are related to population health outcomes? An internationally comparative systematic review
title_fullStr How much evidence is there that political factors are related to population health outcomes? An internationally comparative systematic review
title_full_unstemmed How much evidence is there that political factors are related to population health outcomes? An internationally comparative systematic review
title_short How much evidence is there that political factors are related to population health outcomes? An internationally comparative systematic review
title_sort how much evidence is there that political factors are related to population health outcomes? an internationally comparative systematic review
topic Health Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30341112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020886
work_keys_str_mv AT barnishmax howmuchevidenceistherethatpoliticalfactorsarerelatedtopopulationhealthoutcomesaninternationallycomparativesystematicreview
AT tørnesmichelle howmuchevidenceistherethatpoliticalfactorsarerelatedtopopulationhealthoutcomesaninternationallycomparativesystematicreview
AT nelsonhornebecky howmuchevidenceistherethatpoliticalfactorsarerelatedtopopulationhealthoutcomesaninternationallycomparativesystematicreview