Cargando…

Mixed-methods evaluation of the Perioperative Medicine Service for High-Risk Patients Implementation Pilot (POMSHIP): a study protocol

INTRODUCTION: Perioperative complications have a lasting effect on health-related quality of life and long-term survival. The Royal College of Anaesthetists has proposed the development of perioperative medicine (POM) services as an intervention aimed at improving postoperative outcome, by providing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walker, David, Wagstaff, Duncan, McGuckin, Dermot, Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia, Swart, Nicholas, Morris, Stephen, Crowe, Sonya, Fulop, Naomi J, Moonesinghe, S Ramani
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30344168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021647
_version_ 1783364639419006976
author Walker, David
Wagstaff, Duncan
McGuckin, Dermot
Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia
Swart, Nicholas
Morris, Stephen
Crowe, Sonya
Fulop, Naomi J
Moonesinghe, S Ramani
author_facet Walker, David
Wagstaff, Duncan
McGuckin, Dermot
Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia
Swart, Nicholas
Morris, Stephen
Crowe, Sonya
Fulop, Naomi J
Moonesinghe, S Ramani
author_sort Walker, David
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Perioperative complications have a lasting effect on health-related quality of life and long-term survival. The Royal College of Anaesthetists has proposed the development of perioperative medicine (POM) services as an intervention aimed at improving postoperative outcome, by providing better coordinated care for high-risk patients. The Perioperative Medicine Service for High-risk Patients Implementation Pilot was developed to determine if a specialist POM service is able to reduce postoperative morbidity, failure to rescue, mortality and cost associated with hospital admission. The service involves individualised objective risk assessment, admission to a postoperative critical care unit and follow-up on the surgical ward by the POM team. This paper introduces the service and how it will be evaluated. METHODS AND ANALYSIS OF THE EVALUATION: A mixed-methods evaluation is exploring the impact of the service. Clinical effectiveness of the service is being analysed using a ‘before and after’ comparison of the primary outcome (the PostOperative Morbidity Score). Secondary outcomes will include length of stay, validated surveys to explore quality of life (EQ-5D) and quality of recovery (Quality of Recovery-15 Score). The impact on costs is being analysed using ‘before and after’ data from the Patient-Level Information and Costing System and the National Schedule of Reference Costs. The perceptions and experiences of staff and patients with the service, and how it is being implemented, are being explored by a qualitative process evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was classified as a service evaluation. Participant information sheets and consent forms have been developed for the interviews and approvals required for the use of the validated surveys were obtained. The findings of the evaluation are being used formatively, to make changes in the service throughout implementation. The findings will also be used to inform the potential roll-out of the service to other sites.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6196867
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61968672018-10-25 Mixed-methods evaluation of the Perioperative Medicine Service for High-Risk Patients Implementation Pilot (POMSHIP): a study protocol Walker, David Wagstaff, Duncan McGuckin, Dermot Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia Swart, Nicholas Morris, Stephen Crowe, Sonya Fulop, Naomi J Moonesinghe, S Ramani BMJ Open Anaesthesia INTRODUCTION: Perioperative complications have a lasting effect on health-related quality of life and long-term survival. The Royal College of Anaesthetists has proposed the development of perioperative medicine (POM) services as an intervention aimed at improving postoperative outcome, by providing better coordinated care for high-risk patients. The Perioperative Medicine Service for High-risk Patients Implementation Pilot was developed to determine if a specialist POM service is able to reduce postoperative morbidity, failure to rescue, mortality and cost associated with hospital admission. The service involves individualised objective risk assessment, admission to a postoperative critical care unit and follow-up on the surgical ward by the POM team. This paper introduces the service and how it will be evaluated. METHODS AND ANALYSIS OF THE EVALUATION: A mixed-methods evaluation is exploring the impact of the service. Clinical effectiveness of the service is being analysed using a ‘before and after’ comparison of the primary outcome (the PostOperative Morbidity Score). Secondary outcomes will include length of stay, validated surveys to explore quality of life (EQ-5D) and quality of recovery (Quality of Recovery-15 Score). The impact on costs is being analysed using ‘before and after’ data from the Patient-Level Information and Costing System and the National Schedule of Reference Costs. The perceptions and experiences of staff and patients with the service, and how it is being implemented, are being explored by a qualitative process evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was classified as a service evaluation. Participant information sheets and consent forms have been developed for the interviews and approvals required for the use of the validated surveys were obtained. The findings of the evaluation are being used formatively, to make changes in the service throughout implementation. The findings will also be used to inform the potential roll-out of the service to other sites. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6196867/ /pubmed/30344168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021647 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Anaesthesia
Walker, David
Wagstaff, Duncan
McGuckin, Dermot
Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia
Swart, Nicholas
Morris, Stephen
Crowe, Sonya
Fulop, Naomi J
Moonesinghe, S Ramani
Mixed-methods evaluation of the Perioperative Medicine Service for High-Risk Patients Implementation Pilot (POMSHIP): a study protocol
title Mixed-methods evaluation of the Perioperative Medicine Service for High-Risk Patients Implementation Pilot (POMSHIP): a study protocol
title_full Mixed-methods evaluation of the Perioperative Medicine Service for High-Risk Patients Implementation Pilot (POMSHIP): a study protocol
title_fullStr Mixed-methods evaluation of the Perioperative Medicine Service for High-Risk Patients Implementation Pilot (POMSHIP): a study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Mixed-methods evaluation of the Perioperative Medicine Service for High-Risk Patients Implementation Pilot (POMSHIP): a study protocol
title_short Mixed-methods evaluation of the Perioperative Medicine Service for High-Risk Patients Implementation Pilot (POMSHIP): a study protocol
title_sort mixed-methods evaluation of the perioperative medicine service for high-risk patients implementation pilot (pomship): a study protocol
topic Anaesthesia
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30344168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021647
work_keys_str_mv AT walkerdavid mixedmethodsevaluationoftheperioperativemedicineserviceforhighriskpatientsimplementationpilotpomshipastudyprotocol
AT wagstaffduncan mixedmethodsevaluationoftheperioperativemedicineserviceforhighriskpatientsimplementationpilotpomshipastudyprotocol
AT mcguckindermot mixedmethodsevaluationoftheperioperativemedicineserviceforhighriskpatientsimplementationpilotpomshipastudyprotocol
AT vindrolapadroscecilia mixedmethodsevaluationoftheperioperativemedicineserviceforhighriskpatientsimplementationpilotpomshipastudyprotocol
AT swartnicholas mixedmethodsevaluationoftheperioperativemedicineserviceforhighriskpatientsimplementationpilotpomshipastudyprotocol
AT morrisstephen mixedmethodsevaluationoftheperioperativemedicineserviceforhighriskpatientsimplementationpilotpomshipastudyprotocol
AT crowesonya mixedmethodsevaluationoftheperioperativemedicineserviceforhighriskpatientsimplementationpilotpomshipastudyprotocol
AT fulopnaomij mixedmethodsevaluationoftheperioperativemedicineserviceforhighriskpatientsimplementationpilotpomshipastudyprotocol
AT moonesinghesramani mixedmethodsevaluationoftheperioperativemedicineserviceforhighriskpatientsimplementationpilotpomshipastudyprotocol
AT mixedmethodsevaluationoftheperioperativemedicineserviceforhighriskpatientsimplementationpilotpomshipastudyprotocol