Cargando…
Mixed-methods evaluation of the Perioperative Medicine Service for High-Risk Patients Implementation Pilot (POMSHIP): a study protocol
INTRODUCTION: Perioperative complications have a lasting effect on health-related quality of life and long-term survival. The Royal College of Anaesthetists has proposed the development of perioperative medicine (POM) services as an intervention aimed at improving postoperative outcome, by providing...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30344168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021647 |
_version_ | 1783364639419006976 |
---|---|
author | Walker, David Wagstaff, Duncan McGuckin, Dermot Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia Swart, Nicholas Morris, Stephen Crowe, Sonya Fulop, Naomi J Moonesinghe, S Ramani |
author_facet | Walker, David Wagstaff, Duncan McGuckin, Dermot Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia Swart, Nicholas Morris, Stephen Crowe, Sonya Fulop, Naomi J Moonesinghe, S Ramani |
author_sort | Walker, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Perioperative complications have a lasting effect on health-related quality of life and long-term survival. The Royal College of Anaesthetists has proposed the development of perioperative medicine (POM) services as an intervention aimed at improving postoperative outcome, by providing better coordinated care for high-risk patients. The Perioperative Medicine Service for High-risk Patients Implementation Pilot was developed to determine if a specialist POM service is able to reduce postoperative morbidity, failure to rescue, mortality and cost associated with hospital admission. The service involves individualised objective risk assessment, admission to a postoperative critical care unit and follow-up on the surgical ward by the POM team. This paper introduces the service and how it will be evaluated. METHODS AND ANALYSIS OF THE EVALUATION: A mixed-methods evaluation is exploring the impact of the service. Clinical effectiveness of the service is being analysed using a ‘before and after’ comparison of the primary outcome (the PostOperative Morbidity Score). Secondary outcomes will include length of stay, validated surveys to explore quality of life (EQ-5D) and quality of recovery (Quality of Recovery-15 Score). The impact on costs is being analysed using ‘before and after’ data from the Patient-Level Information and Costing System and the National Schedule of Reference Costs. The perceptions and experiences of staff and patients with the service, and how it is being implemented, are being explored by a qualitative process evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was classified as a service evaluation. Participant information sheets and consent forms have been developed for the interviews and approvals required for the use of the validated surveys were obtained. The findings of the evaluation are being used formatively, to make changes in the service throughout implementation. The findings will also be used to inform the potential roll-out of the service to other sites. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6196867 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61968672018-10-25 Mixed-methods evaluation of the Perioperative Medicine Service for High-Risk Patients Implementation Pilot (POMSHIP): a study protocol Walker, David Wagstaff, Duncan McGuckin, Dermot Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia Swart, Nicholas Morris, Stephen Crowe, Sonya Fulop, Naomi J Moonesinghe, S Ramani BMJ Open Anaesthesia INTRODUCTION: Perioperative complications have a lasting effect on health-related quality of life and long-term survival. The Royal College of Anaesthetists has proposed the development of perioperative medicine (POM) services as an intervention aimed at improving postoperative outcome, by providing better coordinated care for high-risk patients. The Perioperative Medicine Service for High-risk Patients Implementation Pilot was developed to determine if a specialist POM service is able to reduce postoperative morbidity, failure to rescue, mortality and cost associated with hospital admission. The service involves individualised objective risk assessment, admission to a postoperative critical care unit and follow-up on the surgical ward by the POM team. This paper introduces the service and how it will be evaluated. METHODS AND ANALYSIS OF THE EVALUATION: A mixed-methods evaluation is exploring the impact of the service. Clinical effectiveness of the service is being analysed using a ‘before and after’ comparison of the primary outcome (the PostOperative Morbidity Score). Secondary outcomes will include length of stay, validated surveys to explore quality of life (EQ-5D) and quality of recovery (Quality of Recovery-15 Score). The impact on costs is being analysed using ‘before and after’ data from the Patient-Level Information and Costing System and the National Schedule of Reference Costs. The perceptions and experiences of staff and patients with the service, and how it is being implemented, are being explored by a qualitative process evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was classified as a service evaluation. Participant information sheets and consent forms have been developed for the interviews and approvals required for the use of the validated surveys were obtained. The findings of the evaluation are being used formatively, to make changes in the service throughout implementation. The findings will also be used to inform the potential roll-out of the service to other sites. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6196867/ /pubmed/30344168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021647 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Anaesthesia Walker, David Wagstaff, Duncan McGuckin, Dermot Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia Swart, Nicholas Morris, Stephen Crowe, Sonya Fulop, Naomi J Moonesinghe, S Ramani Mixed-methods evaluation of the Perioperative Medicine Service for High-Risk Patients Implementation Pilot (POMSHIP): a study protocol |
title | Mixed-methods evaluation of the Perioperative Medicine Service for High-Risk Patients Implementation Pilot (POMSHIP): a study protocol |
title_full | Mixed-methods evaluation of the Perioperative Medicine Service for High-Risk Patients Implementation Pilot (POMSHIP): a study protocol |
title_fullStr | Mixed-methods evaluation of the Perioperative Medicine Service for High-Risk Patients Implementation Pilot (POMSHIP): a study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Mixed-methods evaluation of the Perioperative Medicine Service for High-Risk Patients Implementation Pilot (POMSHIP): a study protocol |
title_short | Mixed-methods evaluation of the Perioperative Medicine Service for High-Risk Patients Implementation Pilot (POMSHIP): a study protocol |
title_sort | mixed-methods evaluation of the perioperative medicine service for high-risk patients implementation pilot (pomship): a study protocol |
topic | Anaesthesia |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30344168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021647 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walkerdavid mixedmethodsevaluationoftheperioperativemedicineserviceforhighriskpatientsimplementationpilotpomshipastudyprotocol AT wagstaffduncan mixedmethodsevaluationoftheperioperativemedicineserviceforhighriskpatientsimplementationpilotpomshipastudyprotocol AT mcguckindermot mixedmethodsevaluationoftheperioperativemedicineserviceforhighriskpatientsimplementationpilotpomshipastudyprotocol AT vindrolapadroscecilia mixedmethodsevaluationoftheperioperativemedicineserviceforhighriskpatientsimplementationpilotpomshipastudyprotocol AT swartnicholas mixedmethodsevaluationoftheperioperativemedicineserviceforhighriskpatientsimplementationpilotpomshipastudyprotocol AT morrisstephen mixedmethodsevaluationoftheperioperativemedicineserviceforhighriskpatientsimplementationpilotpomshipastudyprotocol AT crowesonya mixedmethodsevaluationoftheperioperativemedicineserviceforhighriskpatientsimplementationpilotpomshipastudyprotocol AT fulopnaomij mixedmethodsevaluationoftheperioperativemedicineserviceforhighriskpatientsimplementationpilotpomshipastudyprotocol AT moonesinghesramani mixedmethodsevaluationoftheperioperativemedicineserviceforhighriskpatientsimplementationpilotpomshipastudyprotocol AT mixedmethodsevaluationoftheperioperativemedicineserviceforhighriskpatientsimplementationpilotpomshipastudyprotocol |