Cargando…

What is associated with increased side effects and lower perceived efficacy following switching to a generic medicine? A New Zealand cross-sectional patient survey

OBJECTIVE: Following a switch from either a generic or branded antidepressant (venlafaxine) to a new generic, we investigated the factors associated with a preference for branded medicines, side effects reported following switching and efficacy ratings of the new generic drug. DESIGN: A cross-sectio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MacKrill, Kate, Petrie, Keith J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30341138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023667
_version_ 1783364640785301504
author MacKrill, Kate
Petrie, Keith J
author_facet MacKrill, Kate
Petrie, Keith J
author_sort MacKrill, Kate
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Following a switch from either a generic or branded antidepressant (venlafaxine) to a new generic, we investigated the factors associated with a preference for branded medicines, side effects reported following switching and efficacy ratings of the new generic drug. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey of patients switched to a new generic. SETTING: Patients accessing venlafaxine information online from the New Zealand government pharmaceuticals funding website. PARTICIPANTS: 310 patients, comprising 205 originally on branded venlafaxine and 105 previously taking a generic version. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: An online questionnaire assessing demographic factors, perceived sensitivity to medicines, trust in pharmaceutical agencies, sources of switch information, preference for branded medicine, new medicine perceptions, side effects and efficacy ratings. RESULTS: Preference for branded medicine was significantly stronger in older patients (OR=1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.05), those taking branded venlafaxine (OR=2.02, 95% CI 1.13 to 3.64) and patients with a higher perceived sensitivity to medicine (OR=1.23, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.19). Different factors predicted side effects in those switching from the branded and those switching from the generic venlafaxine. Trust in pharmaceutical agencies and the number of side effects were significant predictors of efficacy ratings of the new generic in both patients switching from a branded and those switching from a generic version of venlafaxine. CONCLUSIONS: In patients switching from a branded medicine and those already taking a generic, different demographic and psychological factors are associated with preference for branded medicine, side effect reporting and perceived efficacy of the new drug. When switching to new generic, there appears to be a close bidirectional relationship between the experience of side effects and perceived drug efficacy. Trust in pharmaceutical agencies impacts directly on perceived efficacy and increasing such trust could reduce the nocebo response following a generic switch.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6196872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61968722018-10-25 What is associated with increased side effects and lower perceived efficacy following switching to a generic medicine? A New Zealand cross-sectional patient survey MacKrill, Kate Petrie, Keith J BMJ Open Pharmacology and Therapeutics OBJECTIVE: Following a switch from either a generic or branded antidepressant (venlafaxine) to a new generic, we investigated the factors associated with a preference for branded medicines, side effects reported following switching and efficacy ratings of the new generic drug. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey of patients switched to a new generic. SETTING: Patients accessing venlafaxine information online from the New Zealand government pharmaceuticals funding website. PARTICIPANTS: 310 patients, comprising 205 originally on branded venlafaxine and 105 previously taking a generic version. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: An online questionnaire assessing demographic factors, perceived sensitivity to medicines, trust in pharmaceutical agencies, sources of switch information, preference for branded medicine, new medicine perceptions, side effects and efficacy ratings. RESULTS: Preference for branded medicine was significantly stronger in older patients (OR=1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.05), those taking branded venlafaxine (OR=2.02, 95% CI 1.13 to 3.64) and patients with a higher perceived sensitivity to medicine (OR=1.23, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.19). Different factors predicted side effects in those switching from the branded and those switching from the generic venlafaxine. Trust in pharmaceutical agencies and the number of side effects were significant predictors of efficacy ratings of the new generic in both patients switching from a branded and those switching from a generic version of venlafaxine. CONCLUSIONS: In patients switching from a branded medicine and those already taking a generic, different demographic and psychological factors are associated with preference for branded medicine, side effect reporting and perceived efficacy of the new drug. When switching to new generic, there appears to be a close bidirectional relationship between the experience of side effects and perceived drug efficacy. Trust in pharmaceutical agencies impacts directly on perceived efficacy and increasing such trust could reduce the nocebo response following a generic switch. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6196872/ /pubmed/30341138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023667 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Pharmacology and Therapeutics
MacKrill, Kate
Petrie, Keith J
What is associated with increased side effects and lower perceived efficacy following switching to a generic medicine? A New Zealand cross-sectional patient survey
title What is associated with increased side effects and lower perceived efficacy following switching to a generic medicine? A New Zealand cross-sectional patient survey
title_full What is associated with increased side effects and lower perceived efficacy following switching to a generic medicine? A New Zealand cross-sectional patient survey
title_fullStr What is associated with increased side effects and lower perceived efficacy following switching to a generic medicine? A New Zealand cross-sectional patient survey
title_full_unstemmed What is associated with increased side effects and lower perceived efficacy following switching to a generic medicine? A New Zealand cross-sectional patient survey
title_short What is associated with increased side effects and lower perceived efficacy following switching to a generic medicine? A New Zealand cross-sectional patient survey
title_sort what is associated with increased side effects and lower perceived efficacy following switching to a generic medicine? a new zealand cross-sectional patient survey
topic Pharmacology and Therapeutics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30341138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023667
work_keys_str_mv AT mackrillkate whatisassociatedwithincreasedsideeffectsandlowerperceivedefficacyfollowingswitchingtoagenericmedicineanewzealandcrosssectionalpatientsurvey
AT petriekeithj whatisassociatedwithincreasedsideeffectsandlowerperceivedefficacyfollowingswitchingtoagenericmedicineanewzealandcrosssectionalpatientsurvey