Cargando…

Scoping review of systematic reviews of complementary medicine for musculoskeletal and mental health conditions

OBJECTIVE: To identify potentially effective complementary approaches for musculoskeletal (MSK)–mental health (MH) comorbidity, by synthesising evidence on effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and safety from systematic reviews (SRs). DESIGN: Scoping review of SRs. METHODS: We searched literature datab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lorenc, Ava, Feder, Gene, MacPherson, Hugh, Little, Paul, Mercer, Stewart W, Sharp, Deborah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30327397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020222
_version_ 1783364641826537472
author Lorenc, Ava
Feder, Gene
MacPherson, Hugh
Little, Paul
Mercer, Stewart W
Sharp, Deborah
author_facet Lorenc, Ava
Feder, Gene
MacPherson, Hugh
Little, Paul
Mercer, Stewart W
Sharp, Deborah
author_sort Lorenc, Ava
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To identify potentially effective complementary approaches for musculoskeletal (MSK)–mental health (MH) comorbidity, by synthesising evidence on effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and safety from systematic reviews (SRs). DESIGN: Scoping review of SRs. METHODS: We searched literature databases, registries and reference lists, and contacted key authors and professional organisations to identify SRs of randomised controlled trials for complementary medicine for MSK or MH. Inclusion criteria were: published after 2004, studying adults, in English and scoring >50% on Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR); quality appraisal checklist). SRs were synthesised to identify research priorities, based on moderate/good quality evidence, sample size and indication of cost-effectiveness and safety. RESULTS: We included 84 MSK SRs and 27 MH SRs. Only one focused on MSK–MH comorbidity. Meditative approaches and yoga may improve MH outcomes in MSK populations. Yoga and tai chi had moderate/good evidence for MSK and MH conditions. SRs reported moderate/good quality evidence (any comparator) in a moderate/large population for: low back pain (LBP) (yoga, acupuncture, spinal manipulation/mobilisation, osteopathy), osteoarthritis (OA) (acupuncture, tai chi), neck pain (acupuncture, manipulation/manual therapy), myofascial trigger point pain (acupuncture), depression (mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), meditation, tai chi, relaxation), anxiety (meditation/MBSR, moving meditation, yoga), sleep disorders (meditative/mind–body movement) and stress/distress (mindfulness). The majority of these complementary approaches had some evidence of safety—only three had evidence of harm. There was some evidence of cost-effectiveness for spinal manipulation/mobilisation and acupuncture for LBP, and manual therapy/manipulation for neck pain, but few SRs reviewed cost-effectiveness and many found no data. CONCLUSIONS: Only one SR studied MSK–MH comorbidity. Research priorities for complementary medicine for both MSK and MH (LBP, OA, depression, anxiety and sleep problems) are yoga, mindfulness and tai chi. Despite the large number of SRs and the prevalence of comorbidity, more high-quality, large randomised controlled trials in comorbid populations are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6196876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61968762018-10-25 Scoping review of systematic reviews of complementary medicine for musculoskeletal and mental health conditions Lorenc, Ava Feder, Gene MacPherson, Hugh Little, Paul Mercer, Stewart W Sharp, Deborah BMJ Open Complementary Medicine OBJECTIVE: To identify potentially effective complementary approaches for musculoskeletal (MSK)–mental health (MH) comorbidity, by synthesising evidence on effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and safety from systematic reviews (SRs). DESIGN: Scoping review of SRs. METHODS: We searched literature databases, registries and reference lists, and contacted key authors and professional organisations to identify SRs of randomised controlled trials for complementary medicine for MSK or MH. Inclusion criteria were: published after 2004, studying adults, in English and scoring >50% on Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR); quality appraisal checklist). SRs were synthesised to identify research priorities, based on moderate/good quality evidence, sample size and indication of cost-effectiveness and safety. RESULTS: We included 84 MSK SRs and 27 MH SRs. Only one focused on MSK–MH comorbidity. Meditative approaches and yoga may improve MH outcomes in MSK populations. Yoga and tai chi had moderate/good evidence for MSK and MH conditions. SRs reported moderate/good quality evidence (any comparator) in a moderate/large population for: low back pain (LBP) (yoga, acupuncture, spinal manipulation/mobilisation, osteopathy), osteoarthritis (OA) (acupuncture, tai chi), neck pain (acupuncture, manipulation/manual therapy), myofascial trigger point pain (acupuncture), depression (mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), meditation, tai chi, relaxation), anxiety (meditation/MBSR, moving meditation, yoga), sleep disorders (meditative/mind–body movement) and stress/distress (mindfulness). The majority of these complementary approaches had some evidence of safety—only three had evidence of harm. There was some evidence of cost-effectiveness for spinal manipulation/mobilisation and acupuncture for LBP, and manual therapy/manipulation for neck pain, but few SRs reviewed cost-effectiveness and many found no data. CONCLUSIONS: Only one SR studied MSK–MH comorbidity. Research priorities for complementary medicine for both MSK and MH (LBP, OA, depression, anxiety and sleep problems) are yoga, mindfulness and tai chi. Despite the large number of SRs and the prevalence of comorbidity, more high-quality, large randomised controlled trials in comorbid populations are needed. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6196876/ /pubmed/30327397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020222 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Complementary Medicine
Lorenc, Ava
Feder, Gene
MacPherson, Hugh
Little, Paul
Mercer, Stewart W
Sharp, Deborah
Scoping review of systematic reviews of complementary medicine for musculoskeletal and mental health conditions
title Scoping review of systematic reviews of complementary medicine for musculoskeletal and mental health conditions
title_full Scoping review of systematic reviews of complementary medicine for musculoskeletal and mental health conditions
title_fullStr Scoping review of systematic reviews of complementary medicine for musculoskeletal and mental health conditions
title_full_unstemmed Scoping review of systematic reviews of complementary medicine for musculoskeletal and mental health conditions
title_short Scoping review of systematic reviews of complementary medicine for musculoskeletal and mental health conditions
title_sort scoping review of systematic reviews of complementary medicine for musculoskeletal and mental health conditions
topic Complementary Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30327397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020222
work_keys_str_mv AT lorencava scopingreviewofsystematicreviewsofcomplementarymedicineformusculoskeletalandmentalhealthconditions
AT federgene scopingreviewofsystematicreviewsofcomplementarymedicineformusculoskeletalandmentalhealthconditions
AT macphersonhugh scopingreviewofsystematicreviewsofcomplementarymedicineformusculoskeletalandmentalhealthconditions
AT littlepaul scopingreviewofsystematicreviewsofcomplementarymedicineformusculoskeletalandmentalhealthconditions
AT mercerstewartw scopingreviewofsystematicreviewsofcomplementarymedicineformusculoskeletalandmentalhealthconditions
AT sharpdeborah scopingreviewofsystematicreviewsofcomplementarymedicineformusculoskeletalandmentalhealthconditions