Cargando…

Web-based cardiac REhabilitatioN alternative for those declining or dropping out of conventional rehabilitation: results of the WREN feasibility randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is typically delivered in hospital-based classes and is recommended to help people reduce their risk of further cardiac events. However, many eligible people are not completing the programme. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of delivering a web-bas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Houchen-Wolloff, Linzy, Gardiner, Nikki, Devi, Reena, Robertson, Noelle, Jolly, Kate, Marshall, Tom, Furze, Gill, Doherty, Patrick, Szczepura, Ala, Powell, John, Singh, Sally
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30364405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2018-000860
_version_ 1783364655547154432
author Houchen-Wolloff, Linzy
Gardiner, Nikki
Devi, Reena
Robertson, Noelle
Jolly, Kate
Marshall, Tom
Furze, Gill
Doherty, Patrick
Szczepura, Ala
Powell, John
Singh, Sally
author_facet Houchen-Wolloff, Linzy
Gardiner, Nikki
Devi, Reena
Robertson, Noelle
Jolly, Kate
Marshall, Tom
Furze, Gill
Doherty, Patrick
Szczepura, Ala
Powell, John
Singh, Sally
author_sort Houchen-Wolloff, Linzy
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is typically delivered in hospital-based classes and is recommended to help people reduce their risk of further cardiac events. However, many eligible people are not completing the programme. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of delivering a web-based CR intervention for those who decline/drop out from usual CR. INTERVENTION: A web-based CR programme for 6 months, facilitated with remote support. METHODS: Two-centre, randomised controlled feasibility trial. Patients were randomly allocated to web-based CR/usual care for 6 months. Data were collected to inform the design of a larger study: recruitment rates, quality of life (MacNew), exercise capacity (incremental shuttle walk test) and mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). Feasibility of health utility collection was also evaluated. RESULTS: 60 patients were randomised (90% male, mean age 62±9 years, 26% of those eligible). 82% completed all three assessment visits. 78% of the web group completed the programme. Quality of life improved in the web group by a clinically meaningful amount (0.5±1.1 units vs 0.2±0.7 units: control). Exercise capacity improved in both groups but mood did not change in either group. It was feasible to collect health utility data. CONCLUSIONS: It was feasible to recruit and retention to the end of the study was good. The web group reported important improvements in quality of life. This intervention has the opportunity to increase access to CR for patients who would otherwise not attend. Promising outcomes and recruitment suggest feasibility for a full-scale trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 10726798.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6196944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61969442018-10-25 Web-based cardiac REhabilitatioN alternative for those declining or dropping out of conventional rehabilitation: results of the WREN feasibility randomised controlled trial Houchen-Wolloff, Linzy Gardiner, Nikki Devi, Reena Robertson, Noelle Jolly, Kate Marshall, Tom Furze, Gill Doherty, Patrick Szczepura, Ala Powell, John Singh, Sally Open Heart Cardiac Risk Factors and Prevention INTRODUCTION: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is typically delivered in hospital-based classes and is recommended to help people reduce their risk of further cardiac events. However, many eligible people are not completing the programme. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of delivering a web-based CR intervention for those who decline/drop out from usual CR. INTERVENTION: A web-based CR programme for 6 months, facilitated with remote support. METHODS: Two-centre, randomised controlled feasibility trial. Patients were randomly allocated to web-based CR/usual care for 6 months. Data were collected to inform the design of a larger study: recruitment rates, quality of life (MacNew), exercise capacity (incremental shuttle walk test) and mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). Feasibility of health utility collection was also evaluated. RESULTS: 60 patients were randomised (90% male, mean age 62±9 years, 26% of those eligible). 82% completed all three assessment visits. 78% of the web group completed the programme. Quality of life improved in the web group by a clinically meaningful amount (0.5±1.1 units vs 0.2±0.7 units: control). Exercise capacity improved in both groups but mood did not change in either group. It was feasible to collect health utility data. CONCLUSIONS: It was feasible to recruit and retention to the end of the study was good. The web group reported important improvements in quality of life. This intervention has the opportunity to increase access to CR for patients who would otherwise not attend. Promising outcomes and recruitment suggest feasibility for a full-scale trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 10726798. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6196944/ /pubmed/30364405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2018-000860 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle Cardiac Risk Factors and Prevention
Houchen-Wolloff, Linzy
Gardiner, Nikki
Devi, Reena
Robertson, Noelle
Jolly, Kate
Marshall, Tom
Furze, Gill
Doherty, Patrick
Szczepura, Ala
Powell, John
Singh, Sally
Web-based cardiac REhabilitatioN alternative for those declining or dropping out of conventional rehabilitation: results of the WREN feasibility randomised controlled trial
title Web-based cardiac REhabilitatioN alternative for those declining or dropping out of conventional rehabilitation: results of the WREN feasibility randomised controlled trial
title_full Web-based cardiac REhabilitatioN alternative for those declining or dropping out of conventional rehabilitation: results of the WREN feasibility randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Web-based cardiac REhabilitatioN alternative for those declining or dropping out of conventional rehabilitation: results of the WREN feasibility randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Web-based cardiac REhabilitatioN alternative for those declining or dropping out of conventional rehabilitation: results of the WREN feasibility randomised controlled trial
title_short Web-based cardiac REhabilitatioN alternative for those declining or dropping out of conventional rehabilitation: results of the WREN feasibility randomised controlled trial
title_sort web-based cardiac rehabilitation alternative for those declining or dropping out of conventional rehabilitation: results of the wren feasibility randomised controlled trial
topic Cardiac Risk Factors and Prevention
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30364405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2018-000860
work_keys_str_mv AT houchenwollofflinzy webbasedcardiacrehabilitationalternativeforthosedecliningordroppingoutofconventionalrehabilitationresultsofthewrenfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gardinernikki webbasedcardiacrehabilitationalternativeforthosedecliningordroppingoutofconventionalrehabilitationresultsofthewrenfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT devireena webbasedcardiacrehabilitationalternativeforthosedecliningordroppingoutofconventionalrehabilitationresultsofthewrenfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT robertsonnoelle webbasedcardiacrehabilitationalternativeforthosedecliningordroppingoutofconventionalrehabilitationresultsofthewrenfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jollykate webbasedcardiacrehabilitationalternativeforthosedecliningordroppingoutofconventionalrehabilitationresultsofthewrenfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT marshalltom webbasedcardiacrehabilitationalternativeforthosedecliningordroppingoutofconventionalrehabilitationresultsofthewrenfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT furzegill webbasedcardiacrehabilitationalternativeforthosedecliningordroppingoutofconventionalrehabilitationresultsofthewrenfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dohertypatrick webbasedcardiacrehabilitationalternativeforthosedecliningordroppingoutofconventionalrehabilitationresultsofthewrenfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT szczepuraala webbasedcardiacrehabilitationalternativeforthosedecliningordroppingoutofconventionalrehabilitationresultsofthewrenfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT powelljohn webbasedcardiacrehabilitationalternativeforthosedecliningordroppingoutofconventionalrehabilitationresultsofthewrenfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT singhsally webbasedcardiacrehabilitationalternativeforthosedecliningordroppingoutofconventionalrehabilitationresultsofthewrenfeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial