Cargando…

Assessment of patient centredness through patient-reported experience measures (ASPIRED): protocol of a mixed-methods study

INTRODUCTION: The impact of patient centredness (PC) in healthcare has grown over the years. However, conceptualisations of PC are heterogeneous. Existing patient-reported measures of PC have shown inconsistencies and shortcomings. This impedes the comparison of results across studies. To foster PC,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christalle, Eva, Zeh, Stefan, Hahlweg, Pola, Kriston, Levente, Härter, Martin, Scholl, Isabelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30344183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025896
_version_ 1783364659307347968
author Christalle, Eva
Zeh, Stefan
Hahlweg, Pola
Kriston, Levente
Härter, Martin
Scholl, Isabelle
author_facet Christalle, Eva
Zeh, Stefan
Hahlweg, Pola
Kriston, Levente
Härter, Martin
Scholl, Isabelle
author_sort Christalle, Eva
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The impact of patient centredness (PC) in healthcare has grown over the years. However, conceptualisations of PC are heterogeneous. Existing patient-reported measures of PC have shown inconsistencies and shortcomings. This impedes the comparison of results across studies. To foster PC, it is important to know which dimensions matter most to patients and to be able to measure its current extent from the patients’ perspective. This study aims (1) to assess relevance of dimensions of PC from the patients’ perspective, (2) to develop and psychometrically test a core set of patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) assessing PC and (3) to investigate the feasibility of implementation of this core set in routine healthcare. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A mixed-methods approach will be used. In phase 1, 200 patients will assess the relevance of the dimensions of PC in a Delphi study using a plain language description. In phase 2, the core set of PREMs will be developed through literature reviews, focus groups, key informant interviews and content validity ratings. The core set will be tested psychometrically in a cross-sectional study with 2000 inpatient and outpatients with different chronic conditions (ie, cancer, cardiovascular diseases, mental disorders and musculoskeletal disorders). In phase 3, the feasibility of implementation of the core set will be assessed through semistructured interviews with healthcare practitioners after piloting in routine care. Furthermore, an expert workshop will be held on how to foster implementation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be carried out in accordance to the latest version of the Helsinki Declaration of the World Medical Association and principles of good scientific practice. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Association Hamburg, Germany (study ID: PV5724). The study results will be disseminated in scientific journals and through collaboration partners and plain language press releases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6196960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61969602018-10-25 Assessment of patient centredness through patient-reported experience measures (ASPIRED): protocol of a mixed-methods study Christalle, Eva Zeh, Stefan Hahlweg, Pola Kriston, Levente Härter, Martin Scholl, Isabelle BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine INTRODUCTION: The impact of patient centredness (PC) in healthcare has grown over the years. However, conceptualisations of PC are heterogeneous. Existing patient-reported measures of PC have shown inconsistencies and shortcomings. This impedes the comparison of results across studies. To foster PC, it is important to know which dimensions matter most to patients and to be able to measure its current extent from the patients’ perspective. This study aims (1) to assess relevance of dimensions of PC from the patients’ perspective, (2) to develop and psychometrically test a core set of patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) assessing PC and (3) to investigate the feasibility of implementation of this core set in routine healthcare. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A mixed-methods approach will be used. In phase 1, 200 patients will assess the relevance of the dimensions of PC in a Delphi study using a plain language description. In phase 2, the core set of PREMs will be developed through literature reviews, focus groups, key informant interviews and content validity ratings. The core set will be tested psychometrically in a cross-sectional study with 2000 inpatient and outpatients with different chronic conditions (ie, cancer, cardiovascular diseases, mental disorders and musculoskeletal disorders). In phase 3, the feasibility of implementation of the core set will be assessed through semistructured interviews with healthcare practitioners after piloting in routine care. Furthermore, an expert workshop will be held on how to foster implementation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be carried out in accordance to the latest version of the Helsinki Declaration of the World Medical Association and principles of good scientific practice. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Association Hamburg, Germany (study ID: PV5724). The study results will be disseminated in scientific journals and through collaboration partners and plain language press releases. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6196960/ /pubmed/30344183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025896 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Patient-Centred Medicine
Christalle, Eva
Zeh, Stefan
Hahlweg, Pola
Kriston, Levente
Härter, Martin
Scholl, Isabelle
Assessment of patient centredness through patient-reported experience measures (ASPIRED): protocol of a mixed-methods study
title Assessment of patient centredness through patient-reported experience measures (ASPIRED): protocol of a mixed-methods study
title_full Assessment of patient centredness through patient-reported experience measures (ASPIRED): protocol of a mixed-methods study
title_fullStr Assessment of patient centredness through patient-reported experience measures (ASPIRED): protocol of a mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of patient centredness through patient-reported experience measures (ASPIRED): protocol of a mixed-methods study
title_short Assessment of patient centredness through patient-reported experience measures (ASPIRED): protocol of a mixed-methods study
title_sort assessment of patient centredness through patient-reported experience measures (aspired): protocol of a mixed-methods study
topic Patient-Centred Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30344183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025896
work_keys_str_mv AT christalleeva assessmentofpatientcentrednessthroughpatientreportedexperiencemeasuresaspiredprotocolofamixedmethodsstudy
AT zehstefan assessmentofpatientcentrednessthroughpatientreportedexperiencemeasuresaspiredprotocolofamixedmethodsstudy
AT hahlwegpola assessmentofpatientcentrednessthroughpatientreportedexperiencemeasuresaspiredprotocolofamixedmethodsstudy
AT kristonlevente assessmentofpatientcentrednessthroughpatientreportedexperiencemeasuresaspiredprotocolofamixedmethodsstudy
AT hartermartin assessmentofpatientcentrednessthroughpatientreportedexperiencemeasuresaspiredprotocolofamixedmethodsstudy
AT schollisabelle assessmentofpatientcentrednessthroughpatientreportedexperiencemeasuresaspiredprotocolofamixedmethodsstudy