Cargando…
Assessment of patient centredness through patient-reported experience measures (ASPIRED): protocol of a mixed-methods study
INTRODUCTION: The impact of patient centredness (PC) in healthcare has grown over the years. However, conceptualisations of PC are heterogeneous. Existing patient-reported measures of PC have shown inconsistencies and shortcomings. This impedes the comparison of results across studies. To foster PC,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30344183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025896 |
_version_ | 1783364659307347968 |
---|---|
author | Christalle, Eva Zeh, Stefan Hahlweg, Pola Kriston, Levente Härter, Martin Scholl, Isabelle |
author_facet | Christalle, Eva Zeh, Stefan Hahlweg, Pola Kriston, Levente Härter, Martin Scholl, Isabelle |
author_sort | Christalle, Eva |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The impact of patient centredness (PC) in healthcare has grown over the years. However, conceptualisations of PC are heterogeneous. Existing patient-reported measures of PC have shown inconsistencies and shortcomings. This impedes the comparison of results across studies. To foster PC, it is important to know which dimensions matter most to patients and to be able to measure its current extent from the patients’ perspective. This study aims (1) to assess relevance of dimensions of PC from the patients’ perspective, (2) to develop and psychometrically test a core set of patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) assessing PC and (3) to investigate the feasibility of implementation of this core set in routine healthcare. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A mixed-methods approach will be used. In phase 1, 200 patients will assess the relevance of the dimensions of PC in a Delphi study using a plain language description. In phase 2, the core set of PREMs will be developed through literature reviews, focus groups, key informant interviews and content validity ratings. The core set will be tested psychometrically in a cross-sectional study with 2000 inpatient and outpatients with different chronic conditions (ie, cancer, cardiovascular diseases, mental disorders and musculoskeletal disorders). In phase 3, the feasibility of implementation of the core set will be assessed through semistructured interviews with healthcare practitioners after piloting in routine care. Furthermore, an expert workshop will be held on how to foster implementation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be carried out in accordance to the latest version of the Helsinki Declaration of the World Medical Association and principles of good scientific practice. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Association Hamburg, Germany (study ID: PV5724). The study results will be disseminated in scientific journals and through collaboration partners and plain language press releases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6196960 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61969602018-10-25 Assessment of patient centredness through patient-reported experience measures (ASPIRED): protocol of a mixed-methods study Christalle, Eva Zeh, Stefan Hahlweg, Pola Kriston, Levente Härter, Martin Scholl, Isabelle BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine INTRODUCTION: The impact of patient centredness (PC) in healthcare has grown over the years. However, conceptualisations of PC are heterogeneous. Existing patient-reported measures of PC have shown inconsistencies and shortcomings. This impedes the comparison of results across studies. To foster PC, it is important to know which dimensions matter most to patients and to be able to measure its current extent from the patients’ perspective. This study aims (1) to assess relevance of dimensions of PC from the patients’ perspective, (2) to develop and psychometrically test a core set of patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) assessing PC and (3) to investigate the feasibility of implementation of this core set in routine healthcare. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A mixed-methods approach will be used. In phase 1, 200 patients will assess the relevance of the dimensions of PC in a Delphi study using a plain language description. In phase 2, the core set of PREMs will be developed through literature reviews, focus groups, key informant interviews and content validity ratings. The core set will be tested psychometrically in a cross-sectional study with 2000 inpatient and outpatients with different chronic conditions (ie, cancer, cardiovascular diseases, mental disorders and musculoskeletal disorders). In phase 3, the feasibility of implementation of the core set will be assessed through semistructured interviews with healthcare practitioners after piloting in routine care. Furthermore, an expert workshop will be held on how to foster implementation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be carried out in accordance to the latest version of the Helsinki Declaration of the World Medical Association and principles of good scientific practice. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Association Hamburg, Germany (study ID: PV5724). The study results will be disseminated in scientific journals and through collaboration partners and plain language press releases. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6196960/ /pubmed/30344183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025896 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Patient-Centred Medicine Christalle, Eva Zeh, Stefan Hahlweg, Pola Kriston, Levente Härter, Martin Scholl, Isabelle Assessment of patient centredness through patient-reported experience measures (ASPIRED): protocol of a mixed-methods study |
title | Assessment of patient centredness through patient-reported experience measures (ASPIRED): protocol of a mixed-methods study |
title_full | Assessment of patient centredness through patient-reported experience measures (ASPIRED): protocol of a mixed-methods study |
title_fullStr | Assessment of patient centredness through patient-reported experience measures (ASPIRED): protocol of a mixed-methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of patient centredness through patient-reported experience measures (ASPIRED): protocol of a mixed-methods study |
title_short | Assessment of patient centredness through patient-reported experience measures (ASPIRED): protocol of a mixed-methods study |
title_sort | assessment of patient centredness through patient-reported experience measures (aspired): protocol of a mixed-methods study |
topic | Patient-Centred Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30344183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025896 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT christalleeva assessmentofpatientcentrednessthroughpatientreportedexperiencemeasuresaspiredprotocolofamixedmethodsstudy AT zehstefan assessmentofpatientcentrednessthroughpatientreportedexperiencemeasuresaspiredprotocolofamixedmethodsstudy AT hahlwegpola assessmentofpatientcentrednessthroughpatientreportedexperiencemeasuresaspiredprotocolofamixedmethodsstudy AT kristonlevente assessmentofpatientcentrednessthroughpatientreportedexperiencemeasuresaspiredprotocolofamixedmethodsstudy AT hartermartin assessmentofpatientcentrednessthroughpatientreportedexperiencemeasuresaspiredprotocolofamixedmethodsstudy AT schollisabelle assessmentofpatientcentrednessthroughpatientreportedexperiencemeasuresaspiredprotocolofamixedmethodsstudy |