Cargando…

What is the real impact of upper limb cast immobilisation on activity-related energy expenditure in children?

BACKGROUND: Upper limb fractures and subsequent cast immobilisation constitute a potential cause of reduction in childhood levels of physical activity (PA), with subsequent decrease of energy consumption. The main objective of this study was thus to quantify the decrease of activity-related energy e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maggio, Albane B R, Martin, Xavier Eric, Tabard-Fougère, Anne, Delhumeau, Cécile, Ceroni, Dimitri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30364617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000359
_version_ 1783364663360094208
author Maggio, Albane B R
Martin, Xavier Eric
Tabard-Fougère, Anne
Delhumeau, Cécile
Ceroni, Dimitri
author_facet Maggio, Albane B R
Martin, Xavier Eric
Tabard-Fougère, Anne
Delhumeau, Cécile
Ceroni, Dimitri
author_sort Maggio, Albane B R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Upper limb fractures and subsequent cast immobilisation constitute a potential cause of reduction in childhood levels of physical activity (PA), with subsequent decrease of energy consumption. The main objective of this study was thus to quantify the decrease of activity-related energy expenditure (AEE) due to upper limb cast immobilisation. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal matched case-control study that included 35 children and teenagers with a first episode of upper limb fracture and 35 healthy cases. PA was assessed during cast immobilisation by accelerometer. AEE was the calculated using an equation based on the total counts per day measured by accelerometers. RESULTS: AEE in children and teenagers with upper limb fractures was estimated to be 7.4 % lower than healthy controls. The mean difference corresponded to 1.35 kcal/kg per mean valid recorded time (750  min), that is, the waking hours. When converted in kcal per mean subjects’ weight, the difference in AEE amounted 63.5 kcal/day, which corresponds approximately to 26  min of walking at a speed of 4  km/hours. In comparison with the mean AEE in healthy controls (18.2 kcal/kg), the noted decrease (1.35 kcal/kg) represents only 7.4 % of AEE. CONCLUSION: Reduction of AEE in children and teenagers with upper limb fractures may lead to a slight positive energy balance, as there is usually no compensatory reduction of energy intake. An increase of light PA has to be counselled in this situation or patients should be advised to reduce their energy intake during the immobilisation period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I: high-quality prospective study (all patients were enrolled at the same point in their disease with ≥80 % follow-up of enrolled patients).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6196977
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61969772018-10-25 What is the real impact of upper limb cast immobilisation on activity-related energy expenditure in children? Maggio, Albane B R Martin, Xavier Eric Tabard-Fougère, Anne Delhumeau, Cécile Ceroni, Dimitri BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Upper limb fractures and subsequent cast immobilisation constitute a potential cause of reduction in childhood levels of physical activity (PA), with subsequent decrease of energy consumption. The main objective of this study was thus to quantify the decrease of activity-related energy expenditure (AEE) due to upper limb cast immobilisation. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal matched case-control study that included 35 children and teenagers with a first episode of upper limb fracture and 35 healthy cases. PA was assessed during cast immobilisation by accelerometer. AEE was the calculated using an equation based on the total counts per day measured by accelerometers. RESULTS: AEE in children and teenagers with upper limb fractures was estimated to be 7.4 % lower than healthy controls. The mean difference corresponded to 1.35 kcal/kg per mean valid recorded time (750  min), that is, the waking hours. When converted in kcal per mean subjects’ weight, the difference in AEE amounted 63.5 kcal/day, which corresponds approximately to 26  min of walking at a speed of 4  km/hours. In comparison with the mean AEE in healthy controls (18.2 kcal/kg), the noted decrease (1.35 kcal/kg) represents only 7.4 % of AEE. CONCLUSION: Reduction of AEE in children and teenagers with upper limb fractures may lead to a slight positive energy balance, as there is usually no compensatory reduction of energy intake. An increase of light PA has to be counselled in this situation or patients should be advised to reduce their energy intake during the immobilisation period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I: high-quality prospective study (all patients were enrolled at the same point in their disease with ≥80 % follow-up of enrolled patients). BMJ Publishing Group 2018-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6196977/ /pubmed/30364617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000359 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Maggio, Albane B R
Martin, Xavier Eric
Tabard-Fougère, Anne
Delhumeau, Cécile
Ceroni, Dimitri
What is the real impact of upper limb cast immobilisation on activity-related energy expenditure in children?
title What is the real impact of upper limb cast immobilisation on activity-related energy expenditure in children?
title_full What is the real impact of upper limb cast immobilisation on activity-related energy expenditure in children?
title_fullStr What is the real impact of upper limb cast immobilisation on activity-related energy expenditure in children?
title_full_unstemmed What is the real impact of upper limb cast immobilisation on activity-related energy expenditure in children?
title_short What is the real impact of upper limb cast immobilisation on activity-related energy expenditure in children?
title_sort what is the real impact of upper limb cast immobilisation on activity-related energy expenditure in children?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30364617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000359
work_keys_str_mv AT maggioalbanebr whatistherealimpactofupperlimbcastimmobilisationonactivityrelatedenergyexpenditureinchildren
AT martinxaviereric whatistherealimpactofupperlimbcastimmobilisationonactivityrelatedenergyexpenditureinchildren
AT tabardfougereanne whatistherealimpactofupperlimbcastimmobilisationonactivityrelatedenergyexpenditureinchildren
AT delhumeaucecile whatistherealimpactofupperlimbcastimmobilisationonactivityrelatedenergyexpenditureinchildren
AT ceronidimitri whatistherealimpactofupperlimbcastimmobilisationonactivityrelatedenergyexpenditureinchildren