Cargando…
Annual program review process: an enhanced process with outcomes
The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education’s required Annual Program Review of Educational Effectiveness (APREE) has helped us improve our program and change its culture to one of continuous quality improvement. This report outlines our systematic process and describes specific outcome...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30309299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2018.1527626 |
_version_ | 1783364670277550080 |
---|---|
author | Wiemers, Marcy Nadeau, Mark Tysinger, James Fernandez Falcon, Cristian |
author_facet | Wiemers, Marcy Nadeau, Mark Tysinger, James Fernandez Falcon, Cristian |
author_sort | Wiemers, Marcy |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education’s required Annual Program Review of Educational Effectiveness (APREE) has helped us improve our program and change its culture to one of continuous quality improvement. This report outlines our systematic process and describes specific outcomes it has produced over a 10-year period. We identified ways to enhance our APREE after reading articles that described various ways to conduct the process found in a PubMed and OvidSP search and relevant policies from our local Graduate Medical Education Office. After discussing options, we incorporated new ideas into our APREE and tasked our Program Evaluation Committee to track outcomes from objectives developed by faculty and residents during each APREE. Objectives from faculty and residents in 10 years of our APREE led to major improvements (e.g., increased board pass rate) in our program. In addition, the enhanced APREE process gradually changed our residency’s culture to one that embraces continuous quality improvement. A systematic APREE process can engage residents and faculty in improving specific components of a residency. Besides providing outcomes for Web Ads and Self-Study items, the APREE models quality improvement techniques to residents, involves a wide array of stakeholders, and helps program stakeholders embrace continuous quality improvement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6197006 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61970062018-10-23 Annual program review process: an enhanced process with outcomes Wiemers, Marcy Nadeau, Mark Tysinger, James Fernandez Falcon, Cristian Med Educ Online Feature Article The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education’s required Annual Program Review of Educational Effectiveness (APREE) has helped us improve our program and change its culture to one of continuous quality improvement. This report outlines our systematic process and describes specific outcomes it has produced over a 10-year period. We identified ways to enhance our APREE after reading articles that described various ways to conduct the process found in a PubMed and OvidSP search and relevant policies from our local Graduate Medical Education Office. After discussing options, we incorporated new ideas into our APREE and tasked our Program Evaluation Committee to track outcomes from objectives developed by faculty and residents during each APREE. Objectives from faculty and residents in 10 years of our APREE led to major improvements (e.g., increased board pass rate) in our program. In addition, the enhanced APREE process gradually changed our residency’s culture to one that embraces continuous quality improvement. A systematic APREE process can engage residents and faculty in improving specific components of a residency. Besides providing outcomes for Web Ads and Self-Study items, the APREE models quality improvement techniques to residents, involves a wide array of stakeholders, and helps program stakeholders embrace continuous quality improvement. Taylor & Francis 2018-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6197006/ /pubmed/30309299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2018.1527626 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Feature Article Wiemers, Marcy Nadeau, Mark Tysinger, James Fernandez Falcon, Cristian Annual program review process: an enhanced process with outcomes |
title | Annual program review process: an enhanced process with outcomes |
title_full | Annual program review process: an enhanced process with outcomes |
title_fullStr | Annual program review process: an enhanced process with outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Annual program review process: an enhanced process with outcomes |
title_short | Annual program review process: an enhanced process with outcomes |
title_sort | annual program review process: an enhanced process with outcomes |
topic | Feature Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30309299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2018.1527626 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wiemersmarcy annualprogramreviewprocessanenhancedprocesswithoutcomes AT nadeaumark annualprogramreviewprocessanenhancedprocesswithoutcomes AT tysingerjames annualprogramreviewprocessanenhancedprocesswithoutcomes AT fernandezfalconcristian annualprogramreviewprocessanenhancedprocesswithoutcomes |