Cargando…

Annual program review process: an enhanced process with outcomes

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education’s required Annual Program Review of Educational Effectiveness (APREE) has helped us improve our program and change its culture to one of continuous quality improvement. This report outlines our systematic process and describes specific outcome...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiemers, Marcy, Nadeau, Mark, Tysinger, James, Fernandez Falcon, Cristian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30309299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2018.1527626
_version_ 1783364670277550080
author Wiemers, Marcy
Nadeau, Mark
Tysinger, James
Fernandez Falcon, Cristian
author_facet Wiemers, Marcy
Nadeau, Mark
Tysinger, James
Fernandez Falcon, Cristian
author_sort Wiemers, Marcy
collection PubMed
description The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education’s required Annual Program Review of Educational Effectiveness (APREE) has helped us improve our program and change its culture to one of continuous quality improvement. This report outlines our systematic process and describes specific outcomes it has produced over a 10-year period. We identified ways to enhance our APREE after reading articles that described various ways to conduct the process found in a PubMed and OvidSP search and relevant policies from our local Graduate Medical Education Office. After discussing options, we incorporated new ideas into our APREE and tasked our Program Evaluation Committee to track outcomes from objectives developed by faculty and residents during each APREE. Objectives from faculty and residents in 10 years of our APREE led to major improvements (e.g., increased board pass rate) in our program. In addition, the enhanced APREE process gradually changed our residency’s culture to one that embraces continuous quality improvement. A systematic APREE process can engage residents and faculty in improving specific components of a residency. Besides providing outcomes for Web Ads and Self-Study items, the APREE models quality improvement techniques to residents, involves a wide array of stakeholders, and helps program stakeholders embrace continuous quality improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6197006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61970062018-10-23 Annual program review process: an enhanced process with outcomes Wiemers, Marcy Nadeau, Mark Tysinger, James Fernandez Falcon, Cristian Med Educ Online Feature Article The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education’s required Annual Program Review of Educational Effectiveness (APREE) has helped us improve our program and change its culture to one of continuous quality improvement. This report outlines our systematic process and describes specific outcomes it has produced over a 10-year period. We identified ways to enhance our APREE after reading articles that described various ways to conduct the process found in a PubMed and OvidSP search and relevant policies from our local Graduate Medical Education Office. After discussing options, we incorporated new ideas into our APREE and tasked our Program Evaluation Committee to track outcomes from objectives developed by faculty and residents during each APREE. Objectives from faculty and residents in 10 years of our APREE led to major improvements (e.g., increased board pass rate) in our program. In addition, the enhanced APREE process gradually changed our residency’s culture to one that embraces continuous quality improvement. A systematic APREE process can engage residents and faculty in improving specific components of a residency. Besides providing outcomes for Web Ads and Self-Study items, the APREE models quality improvement techniques to residents, involves a wide array of stakeholders, and helps program stakeholders embrace continuous quality improvement. Taylor & Francis 2018-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6197006/ /pubmed/30309299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2018.1527626 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Feature Article
Wiemers, Marcy
Nadeau, Mark
Tysinger, James
Fernandez Falcon, Cristian
Annual program review process: an enhanced process with outcomes
title Annual program review process: an enhanced process with outcomes
title_full Annual program review process: an enhanced process with outcomes
title_fullStr Annual program review process: an enhanced process with outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Annual program review process: an enhanced process with outcomes
title_short Annual program review process: an enhanced process with outcomes
title_sort annual program review process: an enhanced process with outcomes
topic Feature Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30309299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2018.1527626
work_keys_str_mv AT wiemersmarcy annualprogramreviewprocessanenhancedprocesswithoutcomes
AT nadeaumark annualprogramreviewprocessanenhancedprocesswithoutcomes
AT tysingerjames annualprogramreviewprocessanenhancedprocesswithoutcomes
AT fernandezfalconcristian annualprogramreviewprocessanenhancedprocesswithoutcomes