Cargando…

Clinical forensic imaging and fundamental rights in Austria

Clinical forensic imaging encompasses the diverse application of imaging procedures that serve the same purpose: to enable the analysis and investigation of criminal activities and consequences of a crime. All kinds of imaging techniques and their corresponding images can be subsumed under “forensig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kerbacher, Sophie, Pfeifer, Michael, Webb, Bridgette, Riener-Hofer, Reingard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30483622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2017.1328808
_version_ 1783364683698274304
author Kerbacher, Sophie
Pfeifer, Michael
Webb, Bridgette
Riener-Hofer, Reingard
author_facet Kerbacher, Sophie
Pfeifer, Michael
Webb, Bridgette
Riener-Hofer, Reingard
author_sort Kerbacher, Sophie
collection PubMed
description Clinical forensic imaging encompasses the diverse application of imaging procedures that serve the same purpose: to enable the analysis and investigation of criminal activities and consequences of a crime. All kinds of imaging techniques and their corresponding images can be subsumed under “forensigraphy”, a more comprehensive term for forensic imaging created by the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Clinical Forensic Imaging in Graz, Austria. As the word forensigraphy suggests, criminal imaging material should be of use in forensic investigations. Ideally, this can lead to new findings that would not have been revealed without the application of imaging techniques and are moreover admissible as evidence in criminal proceedings. However, the admissibility of evidence can only be facilitated through the implementation of clinical forensic imaging techniques into the forensic routine case work, which requires a precise pre-analysis of the corresponding legal framework. Because taking and displaying internal images of a person's body touches upon various aspects of one's physical and psychological integrity, imaging methods in general and clinical forensic imaging methods especially have a strong impact on and interfere regularly with the fundamental rights of the concerned person. Particularly with regard to a possible medical context, certain legal regulations have to be taken into account. Therefore, this paper examines forensic imaging in the field of radiological forensigraphy, specifically its in vivo (i.e. clinical) application. It is designed to enlighten readers as to the great significance of legal barriers that emerge from fundamental rights, as laid down in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), when dealing with clinical forensic imaging. As a result, the legal framework of clinical forensic imaging procedures are comprehensively described, the relevant fundamental rights, especially the right to respect for private and family life, the right to data protection and certain procedural guarantees, are concisely presented to further raise awareness regarding the importance of fundamental rights.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6197080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61970802018-11-27 Clinical forensic imaging and fundamental rights in Austria Kerbacher, Sophie Pfeifer, Michael Webb, Bridgette Riener-Hofer, Reingard Forensic Sci Res Authoritative Review Clinical forensic imaging encompasses the diverse application of imaging procedures that serve the same purpose: to enable the analysis and investigation of criminal activities and consequences of a crime. All kinds of imaging techniques and their corresponding images can be subsumed under “forensigraphy”, a more comprehensive term for forensic imaging created by the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Clinical Forensic Imaging in Graz, Austria. As the word forensigraphy suggests, criminal imaging material should be of use in forensic investigations. Ideally, this can lead to new findings that would not have been revealed without the application of imaging techniques and are moreover admissible as evidence in criminal proceedings. However, the admissibility of evidence can only be facilitated through the implementation of clinical forensic imaging techniques into the forensic routine case work, which requires a precise pre-analysis of the corresponding legal framework. Because taking and displaying internal images of a person's body touches upon various aspects of one's physical and psychological integrity, imaging methods in general and clinical forensic imaging methods especially have a strong impact on and interfere regularly with the fundamental rights of the concerned person. Particularly with regard to a possible medical context, certain legal regulations have to be taken into account. Therefore, this paper examines forensic imaging in the field of radiological forensigraphy, specifically its in vivo (i.e. clinical) application. It is designed to enlighten readers as to the great significance of legal barriers that emerge from fundamental rights, as laid down in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), when dealing with clinical forensic imaging. As a result, the legal framework of clinical forensic imaging procedures are comprehensively described, the relevant fundamental rights, especially the right to respect for private and family life, the right to data protection and certain procedural guarantees, are concisely presented to further raise awareness regarding the importance of fundamental rights. Taylor & Francis 2017-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6197080/ /pubmed/30483622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2017.1328808 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis Group on behalf of the Institute of Forensic Science, Ministry of Justice, People's Republic of China. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Authoritative Review
Kerbacher, Sophie
Pfeifer, Michael
Webb, Bridgette
Riener-Hofer, Reingard
Clinical forensic imaging and fundamental rights in Austria
title Clinical forensic imaging and fundamental rights in Austria
title_full Clinical forensic imaging and fundamental rights in Austria
title_fullStr Clinical forensic imaging and fundamental rights in Austria
title_full_unstemmed Clinical forensic imaging and fundamental rights in Austria
title_short Clinical forensic imaging and fundamental rights in Austria
title_sort clinical forensic imaging and fundamental rights in austria
topic Authoritative Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30483622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2017.1328808
work_keys_str_mv AT kerbachersophie clinicalforensicimagingandfundamentalrightsinaustria
AT pfeifermichael clinicalforensicimagingandfundamentalrightsinaustria
AT webbbridgette clinicalforensicimagingandfundamentalrightsinaustria
AT rienerhoferreingard clinicalforensicimagingandfundamentalrightsinaustria