Cargando…

Delayed reception of live blowfly (Calliphora vicina and Chrysomya rufifacies) larval samples: implications for minimum postmortem interval estimates

Forensic entomology evidence collected by police and mortuary staff may be delayed in getting to the entomologist. Live samples may continue developing and alter minimum postmortem interval (PMI(min)) estimates. This study investigated development of simulated evidential samples of Calliphora vicina...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Archer, Melanie S., Jones, Stephanie D., Wallman, James F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30483649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2017.1408550
_version_ 1783364695183327232
author Archer, Melanie S.
Jones, Stephanie D.
Wallman, James F.
author_facet Archer, Melanie S.
Jones, Stephanie D.
Wallman, James F.
author_sort Archer, Melanie S.
collection PubMed
description Forensic entomology evidence collected by police and mortuary staff may be delayed in getting to the entomologist. Live samples may continue developing and alter minimum postmortem interval (PMI(min)) estimates. This study investigated development of simulated evidential samples of Calliphora vicina Robineau-Desvoidy and Chrysomya rufifacies (Macquart) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) maggots. Maggots of each species were studied in three developmental classes: “small” (late second/early third instar), “mid” (mid third instar) and “large” (late third instar). Seven replicates of 11 maggots in each class were assigned without food to four treatments: (1) 24 h at 20 °C; (2) 24 h at 4 °C; (3) 48 h at 20 °C and (4) 48 h at 4 °C. There was a significant difference in absolute length change across treatments, reflecting size for C. vicina, and interaction between size, time and temperature for Ch. rufifacies. Calliphora vicina maggots showed minimal mortality, and most second instar larvae moulted by the experiment's end. Chrysomya rufifacies showed heavy mortality and minimal moulting from the second to third instar. Only “large” Ch. rufifacies maggots kept at room temperature for 48 h pupariated. Since these results confirm that development can continue in live unfed maggot samples after their collection, it is not advisable to delay their preservation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6197129
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61971292018-11-27 Delayed reception of live blowfly (Calliphora vicina and Chrysomya rufifacies) larval samples: implications for minimum postmortem interval estimates Archer, Melanie S. Jones, Stephanie D. Wallman, James F. Forensic Sci Res Original Article Forensic entomology evidence collected by police and mortuary staff may be delayed in getting to the entomologist. Live samples may continue developing and alter minimum postmortem interval (PMI(min)) estimates. This study investigated development of simulated evidential samples of Calliphora vicina Robineau-Desvoidy and Chrysomya rufifacies (Macquart) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) maggots. Maggots of each species were studied in three developmental classes: “small” (late second/early third instar), “mid” (mid third instar) and “large” (late third instar). Seven replicates of 11 maggots in each class were assigned without food to four treatments: (1) 24 h at 20 °C; (2) 24 h at 4 °C; (3) 48 h at 20 °C and (4) 48 h at 4 °C. There was a significant difference in absolute length change across treatments, reflecting size for C. vicina, and interaction between size, time and temperature for Ch. rufifacies. Calliphora vicina maggots showed minimal mortality, and most second instar larvae moulted by the experiment's end. Chrysomya rufifacies showed heavy mortality and minimal moulting from the second to third instar. Only “large” Ch. rufifacies maggots kept at room temperature for 48 h pupariated. Since these results confirm that development can continue in live unfed maggot samples after their collection, it is not advisable to delay their preservation. Taylor & Francis 2017-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6197129/ /pubmed/30483649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2017.1408550 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis Group on behalf of the Academy of Forensic Science. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Archer, Melanie S.
Jones, Stephanie D.
Wallman, James F.
Delayed reception of live blowfly (Calliphora vicina and Chrysomya rufifacies) larval samples: implications for minimum postmortem interval estimates
title Delayed reception of live blowfly (Calliphora vicina and Chrysomya rufifacies) larval samples: implications for minimum postmortem interval estimates
title_full Delayed reception of live blowfly (Calliphora vicina and Chrysomya rufifacies) larval samples: implications for minimum postmortem interval estimates
title_fullStr Delayed reception of live blowfly (Calliphora vicina and Chrysomya rufifacies) larval samples: implications for minimum postmortem interval estimates
title_full_unstemmed Delayed reception of live blowfly (Calliphora vicina and Chrysomya rufifacies) larval samples: implications for minimum postmortem interval estimates
title_short Delayed reception of live blowfly (Calliphora vicina and Chrysomya rufifacies) larval samples: implications for minimum postmortem interval estimates
title_sort delayed reception of live blowfly (calliphora vicina and chrysomya rufifacies) larval samples: implications for minimum postmortem interval estimates
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30483649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2017.1408550
work_keys_str_mv AT archermelanies delayedreceptionofliveblowflycalliphoravicinaandchrysomyarufifacieslarvalsamplesimplicationsforminimumpostmortemintervalestimates
AT jonesstephanied delayedreceptionofliveblowflycalliphoravicinaandchrysomyarufifacieslarvalsamplesimplicationsforminimumpostmortemintervalestimates
AT wallmanjamesf delayedreceptionofliveblowflycalliphoravicinaandchrysomyarufifacieslarvalsamplesimplicationsforminimumpostmortemintervalestimates