Cargando…

Bosworth and modified Phemister techniques revisited. A comparison of intraarticular vs extraarticular fixation methods in the treatment of acute Rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocations()

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the long-term clinical and radiological results of Acromioclavicular (AC) fixation with K-wires (the modified Phemister procedure) and Coracoclavicular (CC) fixation with the Bosworth screw in the surgical treatment of Type 3 AC joint dislocations. MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cetinkaya, Engin, Arıkan, Yavuz, Beng, Kubilay, Mutlu, Harun, Yalçınkaya, Merter, Üzümcügil, Onat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29032901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2017.09.002
_version_ 1783364701370974208
author Cetinkaya, Engin
Arıkan, Yavuz
Beng, Kubilay
Mutlu, Harun
Yalçınkaya, Merter
Üzümcügil, Onat
author_facet Cetinkaya, Engin
Arıkan, Yavuz
Beng, Kubilay
Mutlu, Harun
Yalçınkaya, Merter
Üzümcügil, Onat
author_sort Cetinkaya, Engin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the long-term clinical and radiological results of Acromioclavicular (AC) fixation with K-wires (the modified Phemister procedure) and Coracoclavicular (CC) fixation with the Bosworth screw in the surgical treatment of Type 3 AC joint dislocations. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with complete set of medical records and who received surgical treatment between September 2005 and January 2009 due to acute Rockwood Type 3 AC joint dislocation and properly attended their follow-ups were retrospectively evaluated. Sixteen patients (13 males, 3 females; mean age: 38, range: 24–52 years) were treated with CC fixation with Bosworth screw (Group 1), and the other 16 (12 males, 4 females; mean age: 53.3, range: 38–64 years) with AC fixation using K-wires (Group 2). RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 96 months for Group 1 and 93 months for Group 2 patients (p > 0.05). The mean Constant–Murley score at the final follow-up was 84.7 in Group 1 and 87.3 in Group 2 (p = 0.069). Radiological evaluation of the patients revealed AC arthrosis in 2 and 3 patients in Group 1 and 2, respectively. In Group 2, one patient had a recurrent dislocation, three patients had AC arthrosis and two patients had ossification in the CC ligament (Fig. 2). There was no superficial or deep wound infection in Group 1, while two patients from Group 2 had a superficial wound infection. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that both techniques are reliable and provide adequate reduction and similar outcomes in terms of functionality and pain levels, following the reduction of Type 3 AC joint dislocations. With lower rates of wound site infection in the early and AC arthrosis in the late postoperative period, CC fixation method with the Bosworth screw may be a better surgical option than AC fixation method with K-wires. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6197155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61971552018-10-24 Bosworth and modified Phemister techniques revisited. A comparison of intraarticular vs extraarticular fixation methods in the treatment of acute Rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocations() Cetinkaya, Engin Arıkan, Yavuz Beng, Kubilay Mutlu, Harun Yalçınkaya, Merter Üzümcügil, Onat Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc Research Paper OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the long-term clinical and radiological results of Acromioclavicular (AC) fixation with K-wires (the modified Phemister procedure) and Coracoclavicular (CC) fixation with the Bosworth screw in the surgical treatment of Type 3 AC joint dislocations. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with complete set of medical records and who received surgical treatment between September 2005 and January 2009 due to acute Rockwood Type 3 AC joint dislocation and properly attended their follow-ups were retrospectively evaluated. Sixteen patients (13 males, 3 females; mean age: 38, range: 24–52 years) were treated with CC fixation with Bosworth screw (Group 1), and the other 16 (12 males, 4 females; mean age: 53.3, range: 38–64 years) with AC fixation using K-wires (Group 2). RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 96 months for Group 1 and 93 months for Group 2 patients (p > 0.05). The mean Constant–Murley score at the final follow-up was 84.7 in Group 1 and 87.3 in Group 2 (p = 0.069). Radiological evaluation of the patients revealed AC arthrosis in 2 and 3 patients in Group 1 and 2, respectively. In Group 2, one patient had a recurrent dislocation, three patients had AC arthrosis and two patients had ossification in the CC ligament (Fig. 2). There was no superficial or deep wound infection in Group 1, while two patients from Group 2 had a superficial wound infection. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that both techniques are reliable and provide adequate reduction and similar outcomes in terms of functionality and pain levels, following the reduction of Type 3 AC joint dislocations. With lower rates of wound site infection in the early and AC arthrosis in the late postoperative period, CC fixation method with the Bosworth screw may be a better surgical option than AC fixation method with K-wires. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic study. Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2017-12 2017-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6197155/ /pubmed/29032901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2017.09.002 Text en © 2017 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Cetinkaya, Engin
Arıkan, Yavuz
Beng, Kubilay
Mutlu, Harun
Yalçınkaya, Merter
Üzümcügil, Onat
Bosworth and modified Phemister techniques revisited. A comparison of intraarticular vs extraarticular fixation methods in the treatment of acute Rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocations()
title Bosworth and modified Phemister techniques revisited. A comparison of intraarticular vs extraarticular fixation methods in the treatment of acute Rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocations()
title_full Bosworth and modified Phemister techniques revisited. A comparison of intraarticular vs extraarticular fixation methods in the treatment of acute Rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocations()
title_fullStr Bosworth and modified Phemister techniques revisited. A comparison of intraarticular vs extraarticular fixation methods in the treatment of acute Rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocations()
title_full_unstemmed Bosworth and modified Phemister techniques revisited. A comparison of intraarticular vs extraarticular fixation methods in the treatment of acute Rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocations()
title_short Bosworth and modified Phemister techniques revisited. A comparison of intraarticular vs extraarticular fixation methods in the treatment of acute Rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocations()
title_sort bosworth and modified phemister techniques revisited. a comparison of intraarticular vs extraarticular fixation methods in the treatment of acute rockwood type iii acromioclavicular dislocations()
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29032901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2017.09.002
work_keys_str_mv AT cetinkayaengin bosworthandmodifiedphemistertechniquesrevisitedacomparisonofintraarticularvsextraarticularfixationmethodsinthetreatmentofacuterockwoodtypeiiiacromioclaviculardislocations
AT arıkanyavuz bosworthandmodifiedphemistertechniquesrevisitedacomparisonofintraarticularvsextraarticularfixationmethodsinthetreatmentofacuterockwoodtypeiiiacromioclaviculardislocations
AT bengkubilay bosworthandmodifiedphemistertechniquesrevisitedacomparisonofintraarticularvsextraarticularfixationmethodsinthetreatmentofacuterockwoodtypeiiiacromioclaviculardislocations
AT mutluharun bosworthandmodifiedphemistertechniquesrevisitedacomparisonofintraarticularvsextraarticularfixationmethodsinthetreatmentofacuterockwoodtypeiiiacromioclaviculardislocations
AT yalcınkayamerter bosworthandmodifiedphemistertechniquesrevisitedacomparisonofintraarticularvsextraarticularfixationmethodsinthetreatmentofacuterockwoodtypeiiiacromioclaviculardislocations
AT uzumcugilonat bosworthandmodifiedphemistertechniquesrevisitedacomparisonofintraarticularvsextraarticularfixationmethodsinthetreatmentofacuterockwoodtypeiiiacromioclaviculardislocations