Cargando…
An analysis of orthopaedic theses in Turkey: Evidence levels and publication rates
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to present characteristics and publication patterns of studies arise from orthopedic theses obtained from National Thesis Center; database in terms of publication years, study types, topics, level of evidence between 1974 and 2014. METHODS: Firstly, National The...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27839943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2016.03.001 |
_version_ | 1783364704166477824 |
---|---|
author | Koca, Kenan Ekinci, Safak Akpancar, Serkan Gemci, Muhammed Hanifi Erşen, Ömer Akyıldız, Faruk |
author_facet | Koca, Kenan Ekinci, Safak Akpancar, Serkan Gemci, Muhammed Hanifi Erşen, Ömer Akyıldız, Faruk |
author_sort | Koca, Kenan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to present characteristics and publication patterns of studies arise from orthopedic theses obtained from National Thesis Center; database in terms of publication years, study types, topics, level of evidence between 1974 and 2014. METHODS: Firstly, National Thesis Center database was searched for orthopedics and Traumatology theses. The theses, which their summary or full text were available were included in the study. The topics, study types and quality of study designs were reviewed. Then theses were searched in the PubMed database. Journals of published theses were classified according to category, scope and impact factors of the year 2014. RESULTS: 1508 theses were included into the study. Clinical studies comprised 71,7% of the theses, while 25,6% of the theses were non-clinical experimental and 2,7% of the theses were observational studies. Clinical studies were Level I in 8,6% (n = 93) and Level II in 5,8% of the theses (n = 63). A total of 224 theses (14,9%) were published in the journals indexed in PubMed database from 1974 to 2012. Fifty-two (23,2%) were published in SCI; 136 theses (60,7%) were published in SCI-E journals and 36 theses (16%) were published in other Journals indexed in PubMed. CONCLUSION: The quantity and quality of published theses need to be improved and effective measures should be taken to promote quality of theses. Theses from universities and Training hospitals which did not allow open access, and; incomplete records of the National Thesis Center database were major limitations of this study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6197167 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61971672018-10-24 An analysis of orthopaedic theses in Turkey: Evidence levels and publication rates Koca, Kenan Ekinci, Safak Akpancar, Serkan Gemci, Muhammed Hanifi Erşen, Ömer Akyıldız, Faruk Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc Original Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to present characteristics and publication patterns of studies arise from orthopedic theses obtained from National Thesis Center; database in terms of publication years, study types, topics, level of evidence between 1974 and 2014. METHODS: Firstly, National Thesis Center database was searched for orthopedics and Traumatology theses. The theses, which their summary or full text were available were included in the study. The topics, study types and quality of study designs were reviewed. Then theses were searched in the PubMed database. Journals of published theses were classified according to category, scope and impact factors of the year 2014. RESULTS: 1508 theses were included into the study. Clinical studies comprised 71,7% of the theses, while 25,6% of the theses were non-clinical experimental and 2,7% of the theses were observational studies. Clinical studies were Level I in 8,6% (n = 93) and Level II in 5,8% of the theses (n = 63). A total of 224 theses (14,9%) were published in the journals indexed in PubMed database from 1974 to 2012. Fifty-two (23,2%) were published in SCI; 136 theses (60,7%) were published in SCI-E journals and 36 theses (16%) were published in other Journals indexed in PubMed. CONCLUSION: The quantity and quality of published theses need to be improved and effective measures should be taken to promote quality of theses. Theses from universities and Training hospitals which did not allow open access, and; incomplete records of the National Thesis Center database were major limitations of this study. Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2016-10 2016-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6197167/ /pubmed/27839943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2016.03.001 Text en © 2016 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Koca, Kenan Ekinci, Safak Akpancar, Serkan Gemci, Muhammed Hanifi Erşen, Ömer Akyıldız, Faruk An analysis of orthopaedic theses in Turkey: Evidence levels and publication rates |
title | An analysis of orthopaedic theses in Turkey: Evidence levels and publication rates |
title_full | An analysis of orthopaedic theses in Turkey: Evidence levels and publication rates |
title_fullStr | An analysis of orthopaedic theses in Turkey: Evidence levels and publication rates |
title_full_unstemmed | An analysis of orthopaedic theses in Turkey: Evidence levels and publication rates |
title_short | An analysis of orthopaedic theses in Turkey: Evidence levels and publication rates |
title_sort | analysis of orthopaedic theses in turkey: evidence levels and publication rates |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27839943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2016.03.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kocakenan ananalysisoforthopaedicthesesinturkeyevidencelevelsandpublicationrates AT ekincisafak ananalysisoforthopaedicthesesinturkeyevidencelevelsandpublicationrates AT akpancarserkan ananalysisoforthopaedicthesesinturkeyevidencelevelsandpublicationrates AT gemcimuhammedhanifi ananalysisoforthopaedicthesesinturkeyevidencelevelsandpublicationrates AT ersenomer ananalysisoforthopaedicthesesinturkeyevidencelevelsandpublicationrates AT akyıldızfaruk ananalysisoforthopaedicthesesinturkeyevidencelevelsandpublicationrates AT kocakenan analysisoforthopaedicthesesinturkeyevidencelevelsandpublicationrates AT ekincisafak analysisoforthopaedicthesesinturkeyevidencelevelsandpublicationrates AT akpancarserkan analysisoforthopaedicthesesinturkeyevidencelevelsandpublicationrates AT gemcimuhammedhanifi analysisoforthopaedicthesesinturkeyevidencelevelsandpublicationrates AT ersenomer analysisoforthopaedicthesesinturkeyevidencelevelsandpublicationrates AT akyıldızfaruk analysisoforthopaedicthesesinturkeyevidencelevelsandpublicationrates |