Cargando…

Evidence of a Right Ear Advantage in the absence of auditory targets

The Right Ear Advantage effect (REA) was explored in a white noise speech illusion paradigm: binaural white noise (WN) could be presented i) in isolation (WN condition), ii) overlapped to a voice pronouncing the vowel /a/ presented in the left ear (LE condition), iii) overlapped to a voice pronounci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prete, Giulia, D’Anselmo, Anita, Brancucci, Alfredo, Tommasi, Luca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30349021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34086-3
_version_ 1783364728946425856
author Prete, Giulia
D’Anselmo, Anita
Brancucci, Alfredo
Tommasi, Luca
author_facet Prete, Giulia
D’Anselmo, Anita
Brancucci, Alfredo
Tommasi, Luca
author_sort Prete, Giulia
collection PubMed
description The Right Ear Advantage effect (REA) was explored in a white noise speech illusion paradigm: binaural white noise (WN) could be presented i) in isolation (WN condition), ii) overlapped to a voice pronouncing the vowel /a/ presented in the left ear (LE condition), iii) overlapped to a voice pronouncing the vowel /a/ presented in the right ear (RE condition). Participants were asked to report in which ear the voice has been perceived. The voice could be female or male, and it could be presented at 4 different intensities. Participants carried out the task correctly both in LE and in RE conditions. Importantly, in the WN condition the “right ear” responses were more frequent with respect to both the chance level and the “left ear” responses. A perceptual REA was confirmed both in LE and RE conditions. Moreover, when the voice was presented at low intensities (masked by WN), it was more frequently reported in the right than in the left ear (“illusory” REA). A positive correlation emerged between perceptual and illusory REA. Potential links of the REA effects with auditory hallucinations are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6197268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61972682018-10-24 Evidence of a Right Ear Advantage in the absence of auditory targets Prete, Giulia D’Anselmo, Anita Brancucci, Alfredo Tommasi, Luca Sci Rep Article The Right Ear Advantage effect (REA) was explored in a white noise speech illusion paradigm: binaural white noise (WN) could be presented i) in isolation (WN condition), ii) overlapped to a voice pronouncing the vowel /a/ presented in the left ear (LE condition), iii) overlapped to a voice pronouncing the vowel /a/ presented in the right ear (RE condition). Participants were asked to report in which ear the voice has been perceived. The voice could be female or male, and it could be presented at 4 different intensities. Participants carried out the task correctly both in LE and in RE conditions. Importantly, in the WN condition the “right ear” responses were more frequent with respect to both the chance level and the “left ear” responses. A perceptual REA was confirmed both in LE and RE conditions. Moreover, when the voice was presented at low intensities (masked by WN), it was more frequently reported in the right than in the left ear (“illusory” REA). A positive correlation emerged between perceptual and illusory REA. Potential links of the REA effects with auditory hallucinations are discussed. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6197268/ /pubmed/30349021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34086-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Prete, Giulia
D’Anselmo, Anita
Brancucci, Alfredo
Tommasi, Luca
Evidence of a Right Ear Advantage in the absence of auditory targets
title Evidence of a Right Ear Advantage in the absence of auditory targets
title_full Evidence of a Right Ear Advantage in the absence of auditory targets
title_fullStr Evidence of a Right Ear Advantage in the absence of auditory targets
title_full_unstemmed Evidence of a Right Ear Advantage in the absence of auditory targets
title_short Evidence of a Right Ear Advantage in the absence of auditory targets
title_sort evidence of a right ear advantage in the absence of auditory targets
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30349021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34086-3
work_keys_str_mv AT pretegiulia evidenceofarightearadvantageintheabsenceofauditorytargets
AT danselmoanita evidenceofarightearadvantageintheabsenceofauditorytargets
AT brancuccialfredo evidenceofarightearadvantageintheabsenceofauditorytargets
AT tommasiluca evidenceofarightearadvantageintheabsenceofauditorytargets