Cargando…
Pattern of reading eye movements during monovision contact lens wear in presbyopes
Monovision can be used as a method to correct presbyopia with contact lenses (CL) but its effect on reading behavior is still poorly understood. In this study eye movements (EM) were recorded in fifteen presbyopic participants, naïve to monovision, whilst they read arrays of words, non-words, and te...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30349058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33934-6 |
_version_ | 1783364729195986944 |
---|---|
author | Zeri, Fabrizio Naroo, Shehzad A. Zoccolotti, Pierluigi De Luca, Maria |
author_facet | Zeri, Fabrizio Naroo, Shehzad A. Zoccolotti, Pierluigi De Luca, Maria |
author_sort | Zeri, Fabrizio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Monovision can be used as a method to correct presbyopia with contact lenses (CL) but its effect on reading behavior is still poorly understood. In this study eye movements (EM) were recorded in fifteen presbyopic participants, naïve to monovision, whilst they read arrays of words, non-words, and text passages to assess whether monovision affected their reading. Three conditions were compared, using daily disposable CLs: baseline (near correction in both eyes), conventional monovision (distance correction in the dominant eye, near correction in the non-dominant eye), and crossed monovision (the reversal of conventional monovision). Behavioral measures (reading speed and accuracy) and EM parameters (single fixation duration, number of fixations, dwell time per item, percentage of regressions, and percentage of skipped items) were analyzed. When reading passages, no differences in behavioral and EM measures were seen in any comparison of the three conditions. The number of fixations and dwell time significantly increased for both monovision and crossed monovision with respect to baseline only with word and non-word arrays. It appears that monovision did not appreciably alter visual processing when reading meaningful texts but some limited stress of the EM pattern was observed only with arrays of unrelated or meaningless items under monovision, which require the reader to have more in-depth controlled visual processing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6197269 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61972692018-10-24 Pattern of reading eye movements during monovision contact lens wear in presbyopes Zeri, Fabrizio Naroo, Shehzad A. Zoccolotti, Pierluigi De Luca, Maria Sci Rep Article Monovision can be used as a method to correct presbyopia with contact lenses (CL) but its effect on reading behavior is still poorly understood. In this study eye movements (EM) were recorded in fifteen presbyopic participants, naïve to monovision, whilst they read arrays of words, non-words, and text passages to assess whether monovision affected their reading. Three conditions were compared, using daily disposable CLs: baseline (near correction in both eyes), conventional monovision (distance correction in the dominant eye, near correction in the non-dominant eye), and crossed monovision (the reversal of conventional monovision). Behavioral measures (reading speed and accuracy) and EM parameters (single fixation duration, number of fixations, dwell time per item, percentage of regressions, and percentage of skipped items) were analyzed. When reading passages, no differences in behavioral and EM measures were seen in any comparison of the three conditions. The number of fixations and dwell time significantly increased for both monovision and crossed monovision with respect to baseline only with word and non-word arrays. It appears that monovision did not appreciably alter visual processing when reading meaningful texts but some limited stress of the EM pattern was observed only with arrays of unrelated or meaningless items under monovision, which require the reader to have more in-depth controlled visual processing. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6197269/ /pubmed/30349058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33934-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Zeri, Fabrizio Naroo, Shehzad A. Zoccolotti, Pierluigi De Luca, Maria Pattern of reading eye movements during monovision contact lens wear in presbyopes |
title | Pattern of reading eye movements during monovision contact lens wear in presbyopes |
title_full | Pattern of reading eye movements during monovision contact lens wear in presbyopes |
title_fullStr | Pattern of reading eye movements during monovision contact lens wear in presbyopes |
title_full_unstemmed | Pattern of reading eye movements during monovision contact lens wear in presbyopes |
title_short | Pattern of reading eye movements during monovision contact lens wear in presbyopes |
title_sort | pattern of reading eye movements during monovision contact lens wear in presbyopes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30349058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33934-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zerifabrizio patternofreadingeyemovementsduringmonovisioncontactlenswearinpresbyopes AT narooshehzada patternofreadingeyemovementsduringmonovisioncontactlenswearinpresbyopes AT zoccolottipierluigi patternofreadingeyemovementsduringmonovisioncontactlenswearinpresbyopes AT delucamaria patternofreadingeyemovementsduringmonovisioncontactlenswearinpresbyopes |