Cargando…

Pattern of reading eye movements during monovision contact lens wear in presbyopes

Monovision can be used as a method to correct presbyopia with contact lenses (CL) but its effect on reading behavior is still poorly understood. In this study eye movements (EM) were recorded in fifteen presbyopic participants, naïve to monovision, whilst they read arrays of words, non-words, and te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeri, Fabrizio, Naroo, Shehzad A., Zoccolotti, Pierluigi, De Luca, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30349058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33934-6
_version_ 1783364729195986944
author Zeri, Fabrizio
Naroo, Shehzad A.
Zoccolotti, Pierluigi
De Luca, Maria
author_facet Zeri, Fabrizio
Naroo, Shehzad A.
Zoccolotti, Pierluigi
De Luca, Maria
author_sort Zeri, Fabrizio
collection PubMed
description Monovision can be used as a method to correct presbyopia with contact lenses (CL) but its effect on reading behavior is still poorly understood. In this study eye movements (EM) were recorded in fifteen presbyopic participants, naïve to monovision, whilst they read arrays of words, non-words, and text passages to assess whether monovision affected their reading. Three conditions were compared, using daily disposable CLs: baseline (near correction in both eyes), conventional monovision (distance correction in the dominant eye, near correction in the non-dominant eye), and crossed monovision (the reversal of conventional monovision). Behavioral measures (reading speed and accuracy) and EM parameters (single fixation duration, number of fixations, dwell time per item, percentage of regressions, and percentage of skipped items) were analyzed. When reading passages, no differences in behavioral and EM measures were seen in any comparison of the three conditions. The number of fixations and dwell time significantly increased for both monovision and crossed monovision with respect to baseline only with word and non-word arrays. It appears that monovision did not appreciably alter visual processing when reading meaningful texts but some limited stress of the EM pattern was observed only with arrays of unrelated or meaningless items under monovision, which require the reader to have more in-depth controlled visual processing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6197269
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61972692018-10-24 Pattern of reading eye movements during monovision contact lens wear in presbyopes Zeri, Fabrizio Naroo, Shehzad A. Zoccolotti, Pierluigi De Luca, Maria Sci Rep Article Monovision can be used as a method to correct presbyopia with contact lenses (CL) but its effect on reading behavior is still poorly understood. In this study eye movements (EM) were recorded in fifteen presbyopic participants, naïve to monovision, whilst they read arrays of words, non-words, and text passages to assess whether monovision affected their reading. Three conditions were compared, using daily disposable CLs: baseline (near correction in both eyes), conventional monovision (distance correction in the dominant eye, near correction in the non-dominant eye), and crossed monovision (the reversal of conventional monovision). Behavioral measures (reading speed and accuracy) and EM parameters (single fixation duration, number of fixations, dwell time per item, percentage of regressions, and percentage of skipped items) were analyzed. When reading passages, no differences in behavioral and EM measures were seen in any comparison of the three conditions. The number of fixations and dwell time significantly increased for both monovision and crossed monovision with respect to baseline only with word and non-word arrays. It appears that monovision did not appreciably alter visual processing when reading meaningful texts but some limited stress of the EM pattern was observed only with arrays of unrelated or meaningless items under monovision, which require the reader to have more in-depth controlled visual processing. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6197269/ /pubmed/30349058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33934-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Zeri, Fabrizio
Naroo, Shehzad A.
Zoccolotti, Pierluigi
De Luca, Maria
Pattern of reading eye movements during monovision contact lens wear in presbyopes
title Pattern of reading eye movements during monovision contact lens wear in presbyopes
title_full Pattern of reading eye movements during monovision contact lens wear in presbyopes
title_fullStr Pattern of reading eye movements during monovision contact lens wear in presbyopes
title_full_unstemmed Pattern of reading eye movements during monovision contact lens wear in presbyopes
title_short Pattern of reading eye movements during monovision contact lens wear in presbyopes
title_sort pattern of reading eye movements during monovision contact lens wear in presbyopes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30349058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33934-6
work_keys_str_mv AT zerifabrizio patternofreadingeyemovementsduringmonovisioncontactlenswearinpresbyopes
AT narooshehzada patternofreadingeyemovementsduringmonovisioncontactlenswearinpresbyopes
AT zoccolottipierluigi patternofreadingeyemovementsduringmonovisioncontactlenswearinpresbyopes
AT delucamaria patternofreadingeyemovementsduringmonovisioncontactlenswearinpresbyopes