Cargando…

When timing and dose of nutrition support were examined, the modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score did not differentiate high-risk patients who would derive the most benefit from nutrition support: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: The timing and dose of exclusive nutrition support (ENS) have not been investigated in previous studies aimed at validating the modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score. We therefore evaluated the mNUTRIC score by determining the association between dose of nutrition sup...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lew, Charles Chin Han, Wong, Gabriel Jun Yung, Cheung, Ka Po, Fraser, Robert J. L., Chua, Ai Ping, Chong, Mary Foong Fong, Miller, Michelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30350233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0443-1
_version_ 1783364746735517696
author Lew, Charles Chin Han
Wong, Gabriel Jun Yung
Cheung, Ka Po
Fraser, Robert J. L.
Chua, Ai Ping
Chong, Mary Foong Fong
Miller, Michelle
author_facet Lew, Charles Chin Han
Wong, Gabriel Jun Yung
Cheung, Ka Po
Fraser, Robert J. L.
Chua, Ai Ping
Chong, Mary Foong Fong
Miller, Michelle
author_sort Lew, Charles Chin Han
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The timing and dose of exclusive nutrition support (ENS) have not been investigated in previous studies aimed at validating the modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score. We therefore evaluated the mNUTRIC score by determining the association between dose of nutrition support and 28-day mortality in high-risk patients who received short- and longer-term ENS (≤ 6 days vs. ≥ 7 days). METHODS: A prospective cohort study included data from 252 adult patients with > 48 h of mechanical ventilation in a tertiary care institution in Singapore. The dose of nutrition support (amount received ÷ goal: expressed in percentage) was calculated for a maximum of 14 days. Associations between the dose of energy (and protein) intake and 28-day mortality were evaluated with multivariable Cox regressions. Since patients have different durations of ENS, only the first 6 days of ENS in patients with short- and longer-term ENS were assessed in the Cox regressions to ensure a valid comparison of the associations between energy (and protein) intake and 28-day mortality. RESULTS: In high-risk patients with short-term ENS (n = 106), each 10% increase in goal energy intake was associated with an increased hazard of 28-day mortality [adj-HR 1.37 (95% CI 1.17, 1.61)], and this was also observed for protein intake [adj-HR 1.31 (95% CI 1.10, 1.56)]. In contrast, each 10% increase in goal protein intake in high-risk patients with longer-term ENS (n = 146) was associated with a lower hazard of 28-day mortality [adj-HR 0.78 (95% CI 0.66, 0.93)]. The mean mNUTRIC scores in these two groups of patients were similar. CONCLUSION: When timing and dose of nutrition support were examined, the mNUTRIC did not differentiate high-risk patients who would derive the most benefit from nutrition support. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13613-018-0443-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6197342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61973422018-11-02 When timing and dose of nutrition support were examined, the modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score did not differentiate high-risk patients who would derive the most benefit from nutrition support: a prospective cohort study Lew, Charles Chin Han Wong, Gabriel Jun Yung Cheung, Ka Po Fraser, Robert J. L. Chua, Ai Ping Chong, Mary Foong Fong Miller, Michelle Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: The timing and dose of exclusive nutrition support (ENS) have not been investigated in previous studies aimed at validating the modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score. We therefore evaluated the mNUTRIC score by determining the association between dose of nutrition support and 28-day mortality in high-risk patients who received short- and longer-term ENS (≤ 6 days vs. ≥ 7 days). METHODS: A prospective cohort study included data from 252 adult patients with > 48 h of mechanical ventilation in a tertiary care institution in Singapore. The dose of nutrition support (amount received ÷ goal: expressed in percentage) was calculated for a maximum of 14 days. Associations between the dose of energy (and protein) intake and 28-day mortality were evaluated with multivariable Cox regressions. Since patients have different durations of ENS, only the first 6 days of ENS in patients with short- and longer-term ENS were assessed in the Cox regressions to ensure a valid comparison of the associations between energy (and protein) intake and 28-day mortality. RESULTS: In high-risk patients with short-term ENS (n = 106), each 10% increase in goal energy intake was associated with an increased hazard of 28-day mortality [adj-HR 1.37 (95% CI 1.17, 1.61)], and this was also observed for protein intake [adj-HR 1.31 (95% CI 1.10, 1.56)]. In contrast, each 10% increase in goal protein intake in high-risk patients with longer-term ENS (n = 146) was associated with a lower hazard of 28-day mortality [adj-HR 0.78 (95% CI 0.66, 0.93)]. The mean mNUTRIC scores in these two groups of patients were similar. CONCLUSION: When timing and dose of nutrition support were examined, the mNUTRIC did not differentiate high-risk patients who would derive the most benefit from nutrition support. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13613-018-0443-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6197342/ /pubmed/30350233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0443-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Lew, Charles Chin Han
Wong, Gabriel Jun Yung
Cheung, Ka Po
Fraser, Robert J. L.
Chua, Ai Ping
Chong, Mary Foong Fong
Miller, Michelle
When timing and dose of nutrition support were examined, the modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score did not differentiate high-risk patients who would derive the most benefit from nutrition support: a prospective cohort study
title When timing and dose of nutrition support were examined, the modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score did not differentiate high-risk patients who would derive the most benefit from nutrition support: a prospective cohort study
title_full When timing and dose of nutrition support were examined, the modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score did not differentiate high-risk patients who would derive the most benefit from nutrition support: a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr When timing and dose of nutrition support were examined, the modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score did not differentiate high-risk patients who would derive the most benefit from nutrition support: a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed When timing and dose of nutrition support were examined, the modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score did not differentiate high-risk patients who would derive the most benefit from nutrition support: a prospective cohort study
title_short When timing and dose of nutrition support were examined, the modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score did not differentiate high-risk patients who would derive the most benefit from nutrition support: a prospective cohort study
title_sort when timing and dose of nutrition support were examined, the modified nutrition risk in critically ill (mnutric) score did not differentiate high-risk patients who would derive the most benefit from nutrition support: a prospective cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30350233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0443-1
work_keys_str_mv AT lewcharleschinhan whentiminganddoseofnutritionsupportwereexaminedthemodifiednutritionriskincriticallyillmnutricscoredidnotdifferentiatehighriskpatientswhowouldderivethemostbenefitfromnutritionsupportaprospectivecohortstudy
AT wonggabrieljunyung whentiminganddoseofnutritionsupportwereexaminedthemodifiednutritionriskincriticallyillmnutricscoredidnotdifferentiatehighriskpatientswhowouldderivethemostbenefitfromnutritionsupportaprospectivecohortstudy
AT cheungkapo whentiminganddoseofnutritionsupportwereexaminedthemodifiednutritionriskincriticallyillmnutricscoredidnotdifferentiatehighriskpatientswhowouldderivethemostbenefitfromnutritionsupportaprospectivecohortstudy
AT fraserrobertjl whentiminganddoseofnutritionsupportwereexaminedthemodifiednutritionriskincriticallyillmnutricscoredidnotdifferentiatehighriskpatientswhowouldderivethemostbenefitfromnutritionsupportaprospectivecohortstudy
AT chuaaiping whentiminganddoseofnutritionsupportwereexaminedthemodifiednutritionriskincriticallyillmnutricscoredidnotdifferentiatehighriskpatientswhowouldderivethemostbenefitfromnutritionsupportaprospectivecohortstudy
AT chongmaryfoongfong whentiminganddoseofnutritionsupportwereexaminedthemodifiednutritionriskincriticallyillmnutricscoredidnotdifferentiatehighriskpatientswhowouldderivethemostbenefitfromnutritionsupportaprospectivecohortstudy
AT millermichelle whentiminganddoseofnutritionsupportwereexaminedthemodifiednutritionriskincriticallyillmnutricscoredidnotdifferentiatehighriskpatientswhowouldderivethemostbenefitfromnutritionsupportaprospectivecohortstudy