Cargando…

The primary factor for suture configuration at rotator cuff repair: Width of mattress or distance from tear edge

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study was first to investigate whether the bite size or the bite distance from the tear edge is of primary importance in mattress suture configuration for rotator cuff repair. Secondly, whether the use of a 450 left side bent Arthro-Pierce™ (Smith & Nephew, Andover,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hapa, Onur, Karakaşlı, Ahmet, Başçı, Onur, Cici, Hakan, Çeçen, Berivan, Havitçioğlu, Hasan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27492582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2016.07.003
_version_ 1783364759192600576
author Hapa, Onur
Karakaşlı, Ahmet
Başçı, Onur
Cici, Hakan
Çeçen, Berivan
Havitçioğlu, Hasan
author_facet Hapa, Onur
Karakaşlı, Ahmet
Başçı, Onur
Cici, Hakan
Çeçen, Berivan
Havitçioğlu, Hasan
author_sort Hapa, Onur
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study was first to investigate whether the bite size or the bite distance from the tear edge is of primary importance in mattress suture configuration for rotator cuff repair. Secondly, whether the use of a 450 left side bent Arthro-Pierce™ (Smith & Nephew, Andover, USA) during suture passage can be more effective on the strength of the configuration compared to a straight Arthro-Pierce™. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight bovine infraspinatus muscle tendons were randomized into four groups. Group 1; 5 mm wide ‘bite size’ × 15 mm length ‘distance from the tear edge's mattress’; Group 2: 7.5 mm × 10 mm; Group 3: 15 mm × 5 mm ‘using straight Arthro-Pierce™’ and Group 4: 5 mm × 15 mm using left sided 450 bent Arthro-Pierce™. The repair specimens underwent cyclic loading prior to loading the failure testing. Cyclic elongation (mm), peak-to-peak displacement (mm), ultimate load (N), stiffness (N/mm) and failure mode were recorded for each specimen. RESULTS: The mean ultimate load in Group 1 was higher compared to group 3. The peak to peak displacement was higher in Group 4 compared to Group 1 (p < 0.05). The predominant failure mode in Groups 1, 2 and 4 was suture rupture. The Group 3 most specimens failed due to suture cut through the tendon. CONCLUSION: Bite size from the edge of the tendon seems to be more important than the width of the mattress. The curve of the suture passing device may also have an effect on the strength of the suture tendon interface.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6197400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61974002018-10-24 The primary factor for suture configuration at rotator cuff repair: Width of mattress or distance from tear edge Hapa, Onur Karakaşlı, Ahmet Başçı, Onur Cici, Hakan Çeçen, Berivan Havitçioğlu, Hasan Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc Article OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study was first to investigate whether the bite size or the bite distance from the tear edge is of primary importance in mattress suture configuration for rotator cuff repair. Secondly, whether the use of a 450 left side bent Arthro-Pierce™ (Smith & Nephew, Andover, USA) during suture passage can be more effective on the strength of the configuration compared to a straight Arthro-Pierce™. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight bovine infraspinatus muscle tendons were randomized into four groups. Group 1; 5 mm wide ‘bite size’ × 15 mm length ‘distance from the tear edge's mattress’; Group 2: 7.5 mm × 10 mm; Group 3: 15 mm × 5 mm ‘using straight Arthro-Pierce™’ and Group 4: 5 mm × 15 mm using left sided 450 bent Arthro-Pierce™. The repair specimens underwent cyclic loading prior to loading the failure testing. Cyclic elongation (mm), peak-to-peak displacement (mm), ultimate load (N), stiffness (N/mm) and failure mode were recorded for each specimen. RESULTS: The mean ultimate load in Group 1 was higher compared to group 3. The peak to peak displacement was higher in Group 4 compared to Group 1 (p < 0.05). The predominant failure mode in Groups 1, 2 and 4 was suture rupture. The Group 3 most specimens failed due to suture cut through the tendon. CONCLUSION: Bite size from the edge of the tendon seems to be more important than the width of the mattress. The curve of the suture passing device may also have an effect on the strength of the suture tendon interface. Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2016-08 2016-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6197400/ /pubmed/27492582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2016.07.003 Text en © 2016 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hapa, Onur
Karakaşlı, Ahmet
Başçı, Onur
Cici, Hakan
Çeçen, Berivan
Havitçioğlu, Hasan
The primary factor for suture configuration at rotator cuff repair: Width of mattress or distance from tear edge
title The primary factor for suture configuration at rotator cuff repair: Width of mattress or distance from tear edge
title_full The primary factor for suture configuration at rotator cuff repair: Width of mattress or distance from tear edge
title_fullStr The primary factor for suture configuration at rotator cuff repair: Width of mattress or distance from tear edge
title_full_unstemmed The primary factor for suture configuration at rotator cuff repair: Width of mattress or distance from tear edge
title_short The primary factor for suture configuration at rotator cuff repair: Width of mattress or distance from tear edge
title_sort primary factor for suture configuration at rotator cuff repair: width of mattress or distance from tear edge
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27492582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2016.07.003
work_keys_str_mv AT hapaonur theprimaryfactorforsutureconfigurationatrotatorcuffrepairwidthofmattressordistancefromtearedge
AT karakaslıahmet theprimaryfactorforsutureconfigurationatrotatorcuffrepairwidthofmattressordistancefromtearedge
AT bascıonur theprimaryfactorforsutureconfigurationatrotatorcuffrepairwidthofmattressordistancefromtearedge
AT cicihakan theprimaryfactorforsutureconfigurationatrotatorcuffrepairwidthofmattressordistancefromtearedge
AT cecenberivan theprimaryfactorforsutureconfigurationatrotatorcuffrepairwidthofmattressordistancefromtearedge
AT havitciogluhasan theprimaryfactorforsutureconfigurationatrotatorcuffrepairwidthofmattressordistancefromtearedge
AT hapaonur primaryfactorforsutureconfigurationatrotatorcuffrepairwidthofmattressordistancefromtearedge
AT karakaslıahmet primaryfactorforsutureconfigurationatrotatorcuffrepairwidthofmattressordistancefromtearedge
AT bascıonur primaryfactorforsutureconfigurationatrotatorcuffrepairwidthofmattressordistancefromtearedge
AT cicihakan primaryfactorforsutureconfigurationatrotatorcuffrepairwidthofmattressordistancefromtearedge
AT cecenberivan primaryfactorforsutureconfigurationatrotatorcuffrepairwidthofmattressordistancefromtearedge
AT havitciogluhasan primaryfactorforsutureconfigurationatrotatorcuffrepairwidthofmattressordistancefromtearedge