Cargando…

Hexagonal grafts in mosaicplasty: Biomechanical comparison of standard cylindrical and novel hexagonal grafts in calf cadaver model

OBJECTIVE: Cylindrical grafts are currently used to cover defected area in mosaicplasty. However, there are some difficulties with cylindrical grafts, such as potential dead space between grafts and insufficient coverage. Hexagonal graft (honeycomb model) was created and evaluated in this biomechani...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kar, Adem, Demirkıran, Nihat Demirhan, Tatari, Hasan, Uzun, Bora, Ertem, Fatih
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28284491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2017.02.005
_version_ 1783364772161388544
author Kar, Adem
Demirkıran, Nihat Demirhan
Tatari, Hasan
Uzun, Bora
Ertem, Fatih
author_facet Kar, Adem
Demirkıran, Nihat Demirhan
Tatari, Hasan
Uzun, Bora
Ertem, Fatih
author_sort Kar, Adem
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Cylindrical grafts are currently used to cover defected area in mosaicplasty. However, there are some difficulties with cylindrical grafts, such as potential dead space between grafts and insufficient coverage. Hexagonal graft (honeycomb model) was created and evaluated in this biomechanical study. Hypothesis was that harvesting grafts with hexagonal shape, which has the best volume geometry characteristics in nature, would be biomechanically advantageous and provide superior pull-out strength. METHODS: Total of 24 fresh calf femurs were divided into 3 equal groups. In the first group, 1 cylindrical and 1 hexagonal graft were compared. Second group consisted of 3 cylindrical and 3 hexagonal grafts. Third group was designed to evaluate effect of graft depth; hexagonal graft implanted at 5 mm depth was compared with 20-mm-deep hexagonal graft. All specimens were subjected to pull-out test. Friction field and graft surface area were also evaluated. RESULTS: Pull-out strength comparison of 15-mm-deep triple cylindrical grafts and 15-mm-deep triple hexagonal grafts in second group revealed statistically significant difference in favor of hexagonal grafts (p < 0.05). Surface area of cylindrical graft with 9-mm diameter was calculated to be 50.27 mm(2), while hexagonal graft surface area was 55.425 mm(2). Volume ratio of cylindrical and hexagonal grafts was 753.98 mm(3) and 831.375 mm(3), respectively. CONCLUSION: This biomechanical study demonstrated that graft geometry, especially in multiple graft applications, is a factor that influences stability. Hexagonal grafts appear to be more stable than cylindrical grafts in multiple applications, and they may be used to cover a larger defected area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6197459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61974592018-10-24 Hexagonal grafts in mosaicplasty: Biomechanical comparison of standard cylindrical and novel hexagonal grafts in calf cadaver model Kar, Adem Demirkıran, Nihat Demirhan Tatari, Hasan Uzun, Bora Ertem, Fatih Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc Research Article OBJECTIVE: Cylindrical grafts are currently used to cover defected area in mosaicplasty. However, there are some difficulties with cylindrical grafts, such as potential dead space between grafts and insufficient coverage. Hexagonal graft (honeycomb model) was created and evaluated in this biomechanical study. Hypothesis was that harvesting grafts with hexagonal shape, which has the best volume geometry characteristics in nature, would be biomechanically advantageous and provide superior pull-out strength. METHODS: Total of 24 fresh calf femurs were divided into 3 equal groups. In the first group, 1 cylindrical and 1 hexagonal graft were compared. Second group consisted of 3 cylindrical and 3 hexagonal grafts. Third group was designed to evaluate effect of graft depth; hexagonal graft implanted at 5 mm depth was compared with 20-mm-deep hexagonal graft. All specimens were subjected to pull-out test. Friction field and graft surface area were also evaluated. RESULTS: Pull-out strength comparison of 15-mm-deep triple cylindrical grafts and 15-mm-deep triple hexagonal grafts in second group revealed statistically significant difference in favor of hexagonal grafts (p < 0.05). Surface area of cylindrical graft with 9-mm diameter was calculated to be 50.27 mm(2), while hexagonal graft surface area was 55.425 mm(2). Volume ratio of cylindrical and hexagonal grafts was 753.98 mm(3) and 831.375 mm(3), respectively. CONCLUSION: This biomechanical study demonstrated that graft geometry, especially in multiple graft applications, is a factor that influences stability. Hexagonal grafts appear to be more stable than cylindrical grafts in multiple applications, and they may be used to cover a larger defected area. Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2017-03 2017-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6197459/ /pubmed/28284491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2017.02.005 Text en © 2017 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Kar, Adem
Demirkıran, Nihat Demirhan
Tatari, Hasan
Uzun, Bora
Ertem, Fatih
Hexagonal grafts in mosaicplasty: Biomechanical comparison of standard cylindrical and novel hexagonal grafts in calf cadaver model
title Hexagonal grafts in mosaicplasty: Biomechanical comparison of standard cylindrical and novel hexagonal grafts in calf cadaver model
title_full Hexagonal grafts in mosaicplasty: Biomechanical comparison of standard cylindrical and novel hexagonal grafts in calf cadaver model
title_fullStr Hexagonal grafts in mosaicplasty: Biomechanical comparison of standard cylindrical and novel hexagonal grafts in calf cadaver model
title_full_unstemmed Hexagonal grafts in mosaicplasty: Biomechanical comparison of standard cylindrical and novel hexagonal grafts in calf cadaver model
title_short Hexagonal grafts in mosaicplasty: Biomechanical comparison of standard cylindrical and novel hexagonal grafts in calf cadaver model
title_sort hexagonal grafts in mosaicplasty: biomechanical comparison of standard cylindrical and novel hexagonal grafts in calf cadaver model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28284491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2017.02.005
work_keys_str_mv AT karadem hexagonalgraftsinmosaicplastybiomechanicalcomparisonofstandardcylindricalandnovelhexagonalgraftsincalfcadavermodel
AT demirkırannihatdemirhan hexagonalgraftsinmosaicplastybiomechanicalcomparisonofstandardcylindricalandnovelhexagonalgraftsincalfcadavermodel
AT tatarihasan hexagonalgraftsinmosaicplastybiomechanicalcomparisonofstandardcylindricalandnovelhexagonalgraftsincalfcadavermodel
AT uzunbora hexagonalgraftsinmosaicplastybiomechanicalcomparisonofstandardcylindricalandnovelhexagonalgraftsincalfcadavermodel
AT ertemfatih hexagonalgraftsinmosaicplastybiomechanicalcomparisonofstandardcylindricalandnovelhexagonalgraftsincalfcadavermodel