Cargando…
Field safety and effectiveness of new visceral leishmaniasis treatment regimens within public health facilities in Bihar, India
BACKGROUND: In 2010, WHO recommended the use of new short-course treatment regimens in kala-azar elimination efforts for the Indian subcontinent. Although phase 3 studies have shown excellent results, there remains a lack of evidence on a wider treatment population and the safety and effectiveness o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30346949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006830 |
_version_ | 1783364810367303680 |
---|---|
author | Goyal, Vishal Mahajan, Raman Pandey, Krishna Singh, Shambhu Nath Singh, Ravi Shankar Strub-Wourgaft, Nathalie Alves, Fabiana Rabi Das, Vidya Nand Topno, Roshan Kamal Sharma, Bhawna Balasegaram, Manica Bern, Caryn Hightower, Allen Rijal, Suman Ellis, Sally Sunyoto, Temmy Burza, Sakib Lima, Nines Das, Pradeep Alvar, Jorge |
author_facet | Goyal, Vishal Mahajan, Raman Pandey, Krishna Singh, Shambhu Nath Singh, Ravi Shankar Strub-Wourgaft, Nathalie Alves, Fabiana Rabi Das, Vidya Nand Topno, Roshan Kamal Sharma, Bhawna Balasegaram, Manica Bern, Caryn Hightower, Allen Rijal, Suman Ellis, Sally Sunyoto, Temmy Burza, Sakib Lima, Nines Das, Pradeep Alvar, Jorge |
author_sort | Goyal, Vishal |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In 2010, WHO recommended the use of new short-course treatment regimens in kala-azar elimination efforts for the Indian subcontinent. Although phase 3 studies have shown excellent results, there remains a lack of evidence on a wider treatment population and the safety and effectiveness of these regimens under field conditions. METHODS: This was an open label, prospective, non-randomized, non-comparative, multi-centric trial conducted within public health facilities in two highly endemic districts and a specialist referral centre in Bihar, India. Three treatment regimens were tested: single dose AmBisome (SDA), concomitant miltefosine and paromomycin (Milt+PM), and concomitant AmBisome and miltefosine (AmB+Milt). Patients with complicated disease or significant co-morbidities were treated in the SDA arm. Sample sizes were set at a minimum of 300 per arm, taking into account inter-site variation and an estimated failure risk of 5% with 5% precision. Outcomes of drug effectiveness and safety were measured at 6 months. The trial was prospectively registered with the Clinical Trials Registry India: CTRI/2012/08/002891. RESULTS: Out of 1,761 patients recruited, 50.6% (n = 891) received SDA, 20.3% (n = 358) AmB+Milt and 29.1% (n = 512) Milt+PM. In the ITT analysis, the final cure rates were SDA 91.4% (95% CI 89.3–93.1), AmB+Milt 88.8% (95% CI 85.1–91.9) and Milt+PM 96.9% (95% CI 95.0–98.2). In the complete case analysis, cure rates were SDA 95.5% (95% CI 93.9–96.8), AmB+Milt 95.5% (95% CI 92.7–97.5) and Milt+PM 99.6% (95% CI 98.6–99.9). All three regimens were safe, with 5 severe adverse events in the SDA arm, two of which were considered to be drug related. CONCLUSION: All regimens showed acceptable outcomes and safety profiles in a range of patients under field conditions. Phase IV field-based studies, although extremely rare for neglected tropical diseases, are good practice and an important step in validating the results of more restrictive hospital-based studies before widespread implementation, and in this case contributed to national level policy change in India. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial is registered at Clinical trial registry of India (CTRI/2012/08/002891, Registered on 16/08/2012, Trial Registered Prospectively). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6197645 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61976452018-11-19 Field safety and effectiveness of new visceral leishmaniasis treatment regimens within public health facilities in Bihar, India Goyal, Vishal Mahajan, Raman Pandey, Krishna Singh, Shambhu Nath Singh, Ravi Shankar Strub-Wourgaft, Nathalie Alves, Fabiana Rabi Das, Vidya Nand Topno, Roshan Kamal Sharma, Bhawna Balasegaram, Manica Bern, Caryn Hightower, Allen Rijal, Suman Ellis, Sally Sunyoto, Temmy Burza, Sakib Lima, Nines Das, Pradeep Alvar, Jorge PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: In 2010, WHO recommended the use of new short-course treatment regimens in kala-azar elimination efforts for the Indian subcontinent. Although phase 3 studies have shown excellent results, there remains a lack of evidence on a wider treatment population and the safety and effectiveness of these regimens under field conditions. METHODS: This was an open label, prospective, non-randomized, non-comparative, multi-centric trial conducted within public health facilities in two highly endemic districts and a specialist referral centre in Bihar, India. Three treatment regimens were tested: single dose AmBisome (SDA), concomitant miltefosine and paromomycin (Milt+PM), and concomitant AmBisome and miltefosine (AmB+Milt). Patients with complicated disease or significant co-morbidities were treated in the SDA arm. Sample sizes were set at a minimum of 300 per arm, taking into account inter-site variation and an estimated failure risk of 5% with 5% precision. Outcomes of drug effectiveness and safety were measured at 6 months. The trial was prospectively registered with the Clinical Trials Registry India: CTRI/2012/08/002891. RESULTS: Out of 1,761 patients recruited, 50.6% (n = 891) received SDA, 20.3% (n = 358) AmB+Milt and 29.1% (n = 512) Milt+PM. In the ITT analysis, the final cure rates were SDA 91.4% (95% CI 89.3–93.1), AmB+Milt 88.8% (95% CI 85.1–91.9) and Milt+PM 96.9% (95% CI 95.0–98.2). In the complete case analysis, cure rates were SDA 95.5% (95% CI 93.9–96.8), AmB+Milt 95.5% (95% CI 92.7–97.5) and Milt+PM 99.6% (95% CI 98.6–99.9). All three regimens were safe, with 5 severe adverse events in the SDA arm, two of which were considered to be drug related. CONCLUSION: All regimens showed acceptable outcomes and safety profiles in a range of patients under field conditions. Phase IV field-based studies, although extremely rare for neglected tropical diseases, are good practice and an important step in validating the results of more restrictive hospital-based studies before widespread implementation, and in this case contributed to national level policy change in India. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial is registered at Clinical trial registry of India (CTRI/2012/08/002891, Registered on 16/08/2012, Trial Registered Prospectively). Public Library of Science 2018-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6197645/ /pubmed/30346949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006830 Text en © 2018 Goyal et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Goyal, Vishal Mahajan, Raman Pandey, Krishna Singh, Shambhu Nath Singh, Ravi Shankar Strub-Wourgaft, Nathalie Alves, Fabiana Rabi Das, Vidya Nand Topno, Roshan Kamal Sharma, Bhawna Balasegaram, Manica Bern, Caryn Hightower, Allen Rijal, Suman Ellis, Sally Sunyoto, Temmy Burza, Sakib Lima, Nines Das, Pradeep Alvar, Jorge Field safety and effectiveness of new visceral leishmaniasis treatment regimens within public health facilities in Bihar, India |
title | Field safety and effectiveness of new visceral leishmaniasis treatment regimens within public health facilities in Bihar, India |
title_full | Field safety and effectiveness of new visceral leishmaniasis treatment regimens within public health facilities in Bihar, India |
title_fullStr | Field safety and effectiveness of new visceral leishmaniasis treatment regimens within public health facilities in Bihar, India |
title_full_unstemmed | Field safety and effectiveness of new visceral leishmaniasis treatment regimens within public health facilities in Bihar, India |
title_short | Field safety and effectiveness of new visceral leishmaniasis treatment regimens within public health facilities in Bihar, India |
title_sort | field safety and effectiveness of new visceral leishmaniasis treatment regimens within public health facilities in bihar, india |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30346949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006830 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goyalvishal fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia AT mahajanraman fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia AT pandeykrishna fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia AT singhshambhunath fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia AT singhravishankar fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia AT strubwourgaftnathalie fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia AT alvesfabiana fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia AT rabidasvidyanand fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia AT topnoroshankamal fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia AT sharmabhawna fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia AT balasegarammanica fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia AT berncaryn fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia AT hightowerallen fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia AT rijalsuman fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia AT ellissally fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia AT sunyototemmy fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia AT burzasakib fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia AT limanines fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia AT daspradeep fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia AT alvarjorge fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia |