Cargando…

Field safety and effectiveness of new visceral leishmaniasis treatment regimens within public health facilities in Bihar, India

BACKGROUND: In 2010, WHO recommended the use of new short-course treatment regimens in kala-azar elimination efforts for the Indian subcontinent. Although phase 3 studies have shown excellent results, there remains a lack of evidence on a wider treatment population and the safety and effectiveness o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goyal, Vishal, Mahajan, Raman, Pandey, Krishna, Singh, Shambhu Nath, Singh, Ravi Shankar, Strub-Wourgaft, Nathalie, Alves, Fabiana, Rabi Das, Vidya Nand, Topno, Roshan Kamal, Sharma, Bhawna, Balasegaram, Manica, Bern, Caryn, Hightower, Allen, Rijal, Suman, Ellis, Sally, Sunyoto, Temmy, Burza, Sakib, Lima, Nines, Das, Pradeep, Alvar, Jorge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30346949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006830
_version_ 1783364810367303680
author Goyal, Vishal
Mahajan, Raman
Pandey, Krishna
Singh, Shambhu Nath
Singh, Ravi Shankar
Strub-Wourgaft, Nathalie
Alves, Fabiana
Rabi Das, Vidya Nand
Topno, Roshan Kamal
Sharma, Bhawna
Balasegaram, Manica
Bern, Caryn
Hightower, Allen
Rijal, Suman
Ellis, Sally
Sunyoto, Temmy
Burza, Sakib
Lima, Nines
Das, Pradeep
Alvar, Jorge
author_facet Goyal, Vishal
Mahajan, Raman
Pandey, Krishna
Singh, Shambhu Nath
Singh, Ravi Shankar
Strub-Wourgaft, Nathalie
Alves, Fabiana
Rabi Das, Vidya Nand
Topno, Roshan Kamal
Sharma, Bhawna
Balasegaram, Manica
Bern, Caryn
Hightower, Allen
Rijal, Suman
Ellis, Sally
Sunyoto, Temmy
Burza, Sakib
Lima, Nines
Das, Pradeep
Alvar, Jorge
author_sort Goyal, Vishal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2010, WHO recommended the use of new short-course treatment regimens in kala-azar elimination efforts for the Indian subcontinent. Although phase 3 studies have shown excellent results, there remains a lack of evidence on a wider treatment population and the safety and effectiveness of these regimens under field conditions. METHODS: This was an open label, prospective, non-randomized, non-comparative, multi-centric trial conducted within public health facilities in two highly endemic districts and a specialist referral centre in Bihar, India. Three treatment regimens were tested: single dose AmBisome (SDA), concomitant miltefosine and paromomycin (Milt+PM), and concomitant AmBisome and miltefosine (AmB+Milt). Patients with complicated disease or significant co-morbidities were treated in the SDA arm. Sample sizes were set at a minimum of 300 per arm, taking into account inter-site variation and an estimated failure risk of 5% with 5% precision. Outcomes of drug effectiveness and safety were measured at 6 months. The trial was prospectively registered with the Clinical Trials Registry India: CTRI/2012/08/002891. RESULTS: Out of 1,761 patients recruited, 50.6% (n = 891) received SDA, 20.3% (n = 358) AmB+Milt and 29.1% (n = 512) Milt+PM. In the ITT analysis, the final cure rates were SDA 91.4% (95% CI 89.3–93.1), AmB+Milt 88.8% (95% CI 85.1–91.9) and Milt+PM 96.9% (95% CI 95.0–98.2). In the complete case analysis, cure rates were SDA 95.5% (95% CI 93.9–96.8), AmB+Milt 95.5% (95% CI 92.7–97.5) and Milt+PM 99.6% (95% CI 98.6–99.9). All three regimens were safe, with 5 severe adverse events in the SDA arm, two of which were considered to be drug related. CONCLUSION: All regimens showed acceptable outcomes and safety profiles in a range of patients under field conditions. Phase IV field-based studies, although extremely rare for neglected tropical diseases, are good practice and an important step in validating the results of more restrictive hospital-based studies before widespread implementation, and in this case contributed to national level policy change in India. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial is registered at Clinical trial registry of India (CTRI/2012/08/002891, Registered on 16/08/2012, Trial Registered Prospectively).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6197645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61976452018-11-19 Field safety and effectiveness of new visceral leishmaniasis treatment regimens within public health facilities in Bihar, India Goyal, Vishal Mahajan, Raman Pandey, Krishna Singh, Shambhu Nath Singh, Ravi Shankar Strub-Wourgaft, Nathalie Alves, Fabiana Rabi Das, Vidya Nand Topno, Roshan Kamal Sharma, Bhawna Balasegaram, Manica Bern, Caryn Hightower, Allen Rijal, Suman Ellis, Sally Sunyoto, Temmy Burza, Sakib Lima, Nines Das, Pradeep Alvar, Jorge PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: In 2010, WHO recommended the use of new short-course treatment regimens in kala-azar elimination efforts for the Indian subcontinent. Although phase 3 studies have shown excellent results, there remains a lack of evidence on a wider treatment population and the safety and effectiveness of these regimens under field conditions. METHODS: This was an open label, prospective, non-randomized, non-comparative, multi-centric trial conducted within public health facilities in two highly endemic districts and a specialist referral centre in Bihar, India. Three treatment regimens were tested: single dose AmBisome (SDA), concomitant miltefosine and paromomycin (Milt+PM), and concomitant AmBisome and miltefosine (AmB+Milt). Patients with complicated disease or significant co-morbidities were treated in the SDA arm. Sample sizes were set at a minimum of 300 per arm, taking into account inter-site variation and an estimated failure risk of 5% with 5% precision. Outcomes of drug effectiveness and safety were measured at 6 months. The trial was prospectively registered with the Clinical Trials Registry India: CTRI/2012/08/002891. RESULTS: Out of 1,761 patients recruited, 50.6% (n = 891) received SDA, 20.3% (n = 358) AmB+Milt and 29.1% (n = 512) Milt+PM. In the ITT analysis, the final cure rates were SDA 91.4% (95% CI 89.3–93.1), AmB+Milt 88.8% (95% CI 85.1–91.9) and Milt+PM 96.9% (95% CI 95.0–98.2). In the complete case analysis, cure rates were SDA 95.5% (95% CI 93.9–96.8), AmB+Milt 95.5% (95% CI 92.7–97.5) and Milt+PM 99.6% (95% CI 98.6–99.9). All three regimens were safe, with 5 severe adverse events in the SDA arm, two of which were considered to be drug related. CONCLUSION: All regimens showed acceptable outcomes and safety profiles in a range of patients under field conditions. Phase IV field-based studies, although extremely rare for neglected tropical diseases, are good practice and an important step in validating the results of more restrictive hospital-based studies before widespread implementation, and in this case contributed to national level policy change in India. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial is registered at Clinical trial registry of India (CTRI/2012/08/002891, Registered on 16/08/2012, Trial Registered Prospectively). Public Library of Science 2018-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6197645/ /pubmed/30346949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006830 Text en © 2018 Goyal et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Goyal, Vishal
Mahajan, Raman
Pandey, Krishna
Singh, Shambhu Nath
Singh, Ravi Shankar
Strub-Wourgaft, Nathalie
Alves, Fabiana
Rabi Das, Vidya Nand
Topno, Roshan Kamal
Sharma, Bhawna
Balasegaram, Manica
Bern, Caryn
Hightower, Allen
Rijal, Suman
Ellis, Sally
Sunyoto, Temmy
Burza, Sakib
Lima, Nines
Das, Pradeep
Alvar, Jorge
Field safety and effectiveness of new visceral leishmaniasis treatment regimens within public health facilities in Bihar, India
title Field safety and effectiveness of new visceral leishmaniasis treatment regimens within public health facilities in Bihar, India
title_full Field safety and effectiveness of new visceral leishmaniasis treatment regimens within public health facilities in Bihar, India
title_fullStr Field safety and effectiveness of new visceral leishmaniasis treatment regimens within public health facilities in Bihar, India
title_full_unstemmed Field safety and effectiveness of new visceral leishmaniasis treatment regimens within public health facilities in Bihar, India
title_short Field safety and effectiveness of new visceral leishmaniasis treatment regimens within public health facilities in Bihar, India
title_sort field safety and effectiveness of new visceral leishmaniasis treatment regimens within public health facilities in bihar, india
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30346949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006830
work_keys_str_mv AT goyalvishal fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia
AT mahajanraman fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia
AT pandeykrishna fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia
AT singhshambhunath fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia
AT singhravishankar fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia
AT strubwourgaftnathalie fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia
AT alvesfabiana fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia
AT rabidasvidyanand fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia
AT topnoroshankamal fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia
AT sharmabhawna fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia
AT balasegarammanica fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia
AT berncaryn fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia
AT hightowerallen fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia
AT rijalsuman fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia
AT ellissally fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia
AT sunyototemmy fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia
AT burzasakib fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia
AT limanines fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia
AT daspradeep fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia
AT alvarjorge fieldsafetyandeffectivenessofnewvisceralleishmaniasistreatmentregimenswithinpublichealthfacilitiesinbiharindia