Cargando…

P3 Cognitive Potential in Cochlear Implant Users

Introduction  The P3 cognitive evoked potential is recorded when a subject correctly identifies, evaluates and processes two different auditory stimuli. Objective  to evaluate the latency and amplitude of the P3 evoked potential in 26 cochlear implant users with post-lingual deafness with good or po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grasel, Signe, Greters, Mario, Goffi-Gomez, Maria Valeria Schimidt, Bittar, Roseli, Weber, Raimar, Oiticica, Jeanne, Bento, Ricardo Ferreira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30357069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1613687
_version_ 1783364865932394496
author Grasel, Signe
Greters, Mario
Goffi-Gomez, Maria Valeria Schimidt
Bittar, Roseli
Weber, Raimar
Oiticica, Jeanne
Bento, Ricardo Ferreira
author_facet Grasel, Signe
Greters, Mario
Goffi-Gomez, Maria Valeria Schimidt
Bittar, Roseli
Weber, Raimar
Oiticica, Jeanne
Bento, Ricardo Ferreira
author_sort Grasel, Signe
collection PubMed
description Introduction  The P3 cognitive evoked potential is recorded when a subject correctly identifies, evaluates and processes two different auditory stimuli. Objective  to evaluate the latency and amplitude of the P3 evoked potential in 26 cochlear implant users with post-lingual deafness with good or poor speech recognition scores as compared with normal hearing subjects matched for age and educational level. Methods  In this prospective cohort study, auditory cortical responses were recorded from 26 post-lingual deaf adult cochlear implant users (19 with good and 7 with poor speech recognition scores) and 26 control subjects. Results  There was a significant difference in the P3 latency between cochlear implant users with poor speech recognition scores (G-) and their control group (CG) ( p  = 0.04), and between G- and cochlear implant users with good speech discrimination (G+) ( p  = 0.01). We found no significant difference in the P3 latency between the CG and G+. In this study, all G- patients had deafness due to meningitis, which suggests that higher auditory function was impaired too. Conclusion  Post-lingual deaf adult cochlear implant users in the G- group had prolonged P3 latencies as compared with the CG and the cochlear implant users in the G+ group. The amplitudes were similar between patients and controls. All G- subjects were deaf due to meningitis. These findings suggest that meningitis may have deleterious effects not only on the peripheral auditory system but on the central auditory processing as well.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6197977
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61979772018-10-23 P3 Cognitive Potential in Cochlear Implant Users Grasel, Signe Greters, Mario Goffi-Gomez, Maria Valeria Schimidt Bittar, Roseli Weber, Raimar Oiticica, Jeanne Bento, Ricardo Ferreira Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol Introduction  The P3 cognitive evoked potential is recorded when a subject correctly identifies, evaluates and processes two different auditory stimuli. Objective  to evaluate the latency and amplitude of the P3 evoked potential in 26 cochlear implant users with post-lingual deafness with good or poor speech recognition scores as compared with normal hearing subjects matched for age and educational level. Methods  In this prospective cohort study, auditory cortical responses were recorded from 26 post-lingual deaf adult cochlear implant users (19 with good and 7 with poor speech recognition scores) and 26 control subjects. Results  There was a significant difference in the P3 latency between cochlear implant users with poor speech recognition scores (G-) and their control group (CG) ( p  = 0.04), and between G- and cochlear implant users with good speech discrimination (G+) ( p  = 0.01). We found no significant difference in the P3 latency between the CG and G+. In this study, all G- patients had deafness due to meningitis, which suggests that higher auditory function was impaired too. Conclusion  Post-lingual deaf adult cochlear implant users in the G- group had prolonged P3 latencies as compared with the CG and the cochlear implant users in the G+ group. The amplitudes were similar between patients and controls. All G- subjects were deaf due to meningitis. These findings suggest that meningitis may have deleterious effects not only on the peripheral auditory system but on the central auditory processing as well. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2018-10 2018-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6197977/ /pubmed/30357069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1613687 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Grasel, Signe
Greters, Mario
Goffi-Gomez, Maria Valeria Schimidt
Bittar, Roseli
Weber, Raimar
Oiticica, Jeanne
Bento, Ricardo Ferreira
P3 Cognitive Potential in Cochlear Implant Users
title P3 Cognitive Potential in Cochlear Implant Users
title_full P3 Cognitive Potential in Cochlear Implant Users
title_fullStr P3 Cognitive Potential in Cochlear Implant Users
title_full_unstemmed P3 Cognitive Potential in Cochlear Implant Users
title_short P3 Cognitive Potential in Cochlear Implant Users
title_sort p3 cognitive potential in cochlear implant users
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30357069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1613687
work_keys_str_mv AT graselsigne p3cognitivepotentialincochlearimplantusers
AT gretersmario p3cognitivepotentialincochlearimplantusers
AT goffigomezmariavaleriaschimidt p3cognitivepotentialincochlearimplantusers
AT bittarroseli p3cognitivepotentialincochlearimplantusers
AT weberraimar p3cognitivepotentialincochlearimplantusers
AT oiticicajeanne p3cognitivepotentialincochlearimplantusers
AT bentoricardoferreira p3cognitivepotentialincochlearimplantusers