Cargando…
P3 Cognitive Potential in Cochlear Implant Users
Introduction The P3 cognitive evoked potential is recorded when a subject correctly identifies, evaluates and processes two different auditory stimuli. Objective to evaluate the latency and amplitude of the P3 evoked potential in 26 cochlear implant users with post-lingual deafness with good or po...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda
2018
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30357069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1613687 |
_version_ | 1783364865932394496 |
---|---|
author | Grasel, Signe Greters, Mario Goffi-Gomez, Maria Valeria Schimidt Bittar, Roseli Weber, Raimar Oiticica, Jeanne Bento, Ricardo Ferreira |
author_facet | Grasel, Signe Greters, Mario Goffi-Gomez, Maria Valeria Schimidt Bittar, Roseli Weber, Raimar Oiticica, Jeanne Bento, Ricardo Ferreira |
author_sort | Grasel, Signe |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction The P3 cognitive evoked potential is recorded when a subject correctly identifies, evaluates and processes two different auditory stimuli. Objective to evaluate the latency and amplitude of the P3 evoked potential in 26 cochlear implant users with post-lingual deafness with good or poor speech recognition scores as compared with normal hearing subjects matched for age and educational level. Methods In this prospective cohort study, auditory cortical responses were recorded from 26 post-lingual deaf adult cochlear implant users (19 with good and 7 with poor speech recognition scores) and 26 control subjects. Results There was a significant difference in the P3 latency between cochlear implant users with poor speech recognition scores (G-) and their control group (CG) ( p = 0.04), and between G- and cochlear implant users with good speech discrimination (G+) ( p = 0.01). We found no significant difference in the P3 latency between the CG and G+. In this study, all G- patients had deafness due to meningitis, which suggests that higher auditory function was impaired too. Conclusion Post-lingual deaf adult cochlear implant users in the G- group had prolonged P3 latencies as compared with the CG and the cochlear implant users in the G+ group. The amplitudes were similar between patients and controls. All G- subjects were deaf due to meningitis. These findings suggest that meningitis may have deleterious effects not only on the peripheral auditory system but on the central auditory processing as well. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6197977 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61979772018-10-23 P3 Cognitive Potential in Cochlear Implant Users Grasel, Signe Greters, Mario Goffi-Gomez, Maria Valeria Schimidt Bittar, Roseli Weber, Raimar Oiticica, Jeanne Bento, Ricardo Ferreira Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol Introduction The P3 cognitive evoked potential is recorded when a subject correctly identifies, evaluates and processes two different auditory stimuli. Objective to evaluate the latency and amplitude of the P3 evoked potential in 26 cochlear implant users with post-lingual deafness with good or poor speech recognition scores as compared with normal hearing subjects matched for age and educational level. Methods In this prospective cohort study, auditory cortical responses were recorded from 26 post-lingual deaf adult cochlear implant users (19 with good and 7 with poor speech recognition scores) and 26 control subjects. Results There was a significant difference in the P3 latency between cochlear implant users with poor speech recognition scores (G-) and their control group (CG) ( p = 0.04), and between G- and cochlear implant users with good speech discrimination (G+) ( p = 0.01). We found no significant difference in the P3 latency between the CG and G+. In this study, all G- patients had deafness due to meningitis, which suggests that higher auditory function was impaired too. Conclusion Post-lingual deaf adult cochlear implant users in the G- group had prolonged P3 latencies as compared with the CG and the cochlear implant users in the G+ group. The amplitudes were similar between patients and controls. All G- subjects were deaf due to meningitis. These findings suggest that meningitis may have deleterious effects not only on the peripheral auditory system but on the central auditory processing as well. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2018-10 2018-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6197977/ /pubmed/30357069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1613687 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Grasel, Signe Greters, Mario Goffi-Gomez, Maria Valeria Schimidt Bittar, Roseli Weber, Raimar Oiticica, Jeanne Bento, Ricardo Ferreira P3 Cognitive Potential in Cochlear Implant Users |
title | P3 Cognitive Potential in Cochlear Implant Users |
title_full | P3 Cognitive Potential in Cochlear Implant Users |
title_fullStr | P3 Cognitive Potential in Cochlear Implant Users |
title_full_unstemmed | P3 Cognitive Potential in Cochlear Implant Users |
title_short | P3 Cognitive Potential in Cochlear Implant Users |
title_sort | p3 cognitive potential in cochlear implant users |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6197977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30357069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1613687 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT graselsigne p3cognitivepotentialincochlearimplantusers AT gretersmario p3cognitivepotentialincochlearimplantusers AT goffigomezmariavaleriaschimidt p3cognitivepotentialincochlearimplantusers AT bittarroseli p3cognitivepotentialincochlearimplantusers AT weberraimar p3cognitivepotentialincochlearimplantusers AT oiticicajeanne p3cognitivepotentialincochlearimplantusers AT bentoricardoferreira p3cognitivepotentialincochlearimplantusers |