Cargando…

The Influence of the Presentation of Camera Surveillance on Cheating and Pro-Social Behavior

Introduction: This study is aimed at gaining more insight into the effects of camera-surveillance on behavior. It investigates the effects of three different ways of “framing” camera presence on cheating behavior and pro-social behavior. First, we explore the effect of presenting the camera as the m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jansen, Anja M., Giebels, Ellen, van Rompay, Thomas J. L., Junger, Marianne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6198084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386277
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01937
_version_ 1783364891145404416
author Jansen, Anja M.
Giebels, Ellen
van Rompay, Thomas J. L.
Junger, Marianne
author_facet Jansen, Anja M.
Giebels, Ellen
van Rompay, Thomas J. L.
Junger, Marianne
author_sort Jansen, Anja M.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: This study is aimed at gaining more insight into the effects of camera-surveillance on behavior. It investigates the effects of three different ways of “framing” camera presence on cheating behavior and pro-social behavior. First, we explore the effect of presenting the camera as the medium through which an intimidating authority watches the participant. Second, we test the effect of presenting the camera as being a neutral, non-intimidating viewer. Third, we investigate the effect of watching oneself via a camera. In contrast to most studies on camera surveillance, we will conduct our experiments in an indoor setting. We also explore possible interaction effects of personality traits; we measured Locus of Control, Need for Approval, Self-Monitoring and Social Value Orientation. Methods: In this experiment participated 86 students, randomly distributed over four conditions: three different ways of framing the camera presence, plus a control condition. Our main dependent variables were various kinds of cheating and pro-social behavior. We established the participant's relevant personality traits using a classification tree. Results: For cheating behavior, findings showed that in the “authorative” way of framing camera presence and in the situation in which participants viewed themselves, participants cheated significantly less compared to a situation without camera-surveillance. We did not find significant effects of camera surveillance on pro-social behavior. Looking at personality traits, we found an indication that people with an internal locus of control are more inclined to cheat when there is no camera present compared to people with an external locus of control. However, the effects of our manipulations were stronger. Conclusion: Our findings support the idea that the framing of a camera's presence does indeed influence cheating behavior, adding to the preventive effects of camera-surveillance. Additionally, this study provides some valuable insights into the influence of camera presence on behavior in general.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6198084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61980842018-11-01 The Influence of the Presentation of Camera Surveillance on Cheating and Pro-Social Behavior Jansen, Anja M. Giebels, Ellen van Rompay, Thomas J. L. Junger, Marianne Front Psychol Psychology Introduction: This study is aimed at gaining more insight into the effects of camera-surveillance on behavior. It investigates the effects of three different ways of “framing” camera presence on cheating behavior and pro-social behavior. First, we explore the effect of presenting the camera as the medium through which an intimidating authority watches the participant. Second, we test the effect of presenting the camera as being a neutral, non-intimidating viewer. Third, we investigate the effect of watching oneself via a camera. In contrast to most studies on camera surveillance, we will conduct our experiments in an indoor setting. We also explore possible interaction effects of personality traits; we measured Locus of Control, Need for Approval, Self-Monitoring and Social Value Orientation. Methods: In this experiment participated 86 students, randomly distributed over four conditions: three different ways of framing the camera presence, plus a control condition. Our main dependent variables were various kinds of cheating and pro-social behavior. We established the participant's relevant personality traits using a classification tree. Results: For cheating behavior, findings showed that in the “authorative” way of framing camera presence and in the situation in which participants viewed themselves, participants cheated significantly less compared to a situation without camera-surveillance. We did not find significant effects of camera surveillance on pro-social behavior. Looking at personality traits, we found an indication that people with an internal locus of control are more inclined to cheat when there is no camera present compared to people with an external locus of control. However, the effects of our manipulations were stronger. Conclusion: Our findings support the idea that the framing of a camera's presence does indeed influence cheating behavior, adding to the preventive effects of camera-surveillance. Additionally, this study provides some valuable insights into the influence of camera presence on behavior in general. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6198084/ /pubmed/30386277 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01937 Text en Copyright © 2018 Jansen, Giebels, van Rompay and Junger. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Jansen, Anja M.
Giebels, Ellen
van Rompay, Thomas J. L.
Junger, Marianne
The Influence of the Presentation of Camera Surveillance on Cheating and Pro-Social Behavior
title The Influence of the Presentation of Camera Surveillance on Cheating and Pro-Social Behavior
title_full The Influence of the Presentation of Camera Surveillance on Cheating and Pro-Social Behavior
title_fullStr The Influence of the Presentation of Camera Surveillance on Cheating and Pro-Social Behavior
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of the Presentation of Camera Surveillance on Cheating and Pro-Social Behavior
title_short The Influence of the Presentation of Camera Surveillance on Cheating and Pro-Social Behavior
title_sort influence of the presentation of camera surveillance on cheating and pro-social behavior
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6198084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386277
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01937
work_keys_str_mv AT jansenanjam theinfluenceofthepresentationofcamerasurveillanceoncheatingandprosocialbehavior
AT giebelsellen theinfluenceofthepresentationofcamerasurveillanceoncheatingandprosocialbehavior
AT vanrompaythomasjl theinfluenceofthepresentationofcamerasurveillanceoncheatingandprosocialbehavior
AT jungermarianne theinfluenceofthepresentationofcamerasurveillanceoncheatingandprosocialbehavior
AT jansenanjam influenceofthepresentationofcamerasurveillanceoncheatingandprosocialbehavior
AT giebelsellen influenceofthepresentationofcamerasurveillanceoncheatingandprosocialbehavior
AT vanrompaythomasjl influenceofthepresentationofcamerasurveillanceoncheatingandprosocialbehavior
AT jungermarianne influenceofthepresentationofcamerasurveillanceoncheatingandprosocialbehavior