Cargando…

Three weeks of respiratory muscle endurance training improve the O(2) cost of walking and exercise tolerance in obese adolescents

Obese adolescents (OB) have an increased O(2) cost of exercise, attributable in part to an increased O(2) cost of breathing. In a previous work a short (3‐week) program of respiratory muscle endurance training (RMET) slightly reduced in OB the O(2) cost of high‐intensity cycling and improved exercis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alemayehu, Hailu K., Salvadego, Desy, Isola, Miriam, Tringali, Gabriella, De Micheli, Roberta, Caccavale, Mara, Sartorio, Alessandro, Grassi, Bruno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6198139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30350405
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13888
Descripción
Sumario:Obese adolescents (OB) have an increased O(2) cost of exercise, attributable in part to an increased O(2) cost of breathing. In a previous work a short (3‐week) program of respiratory muscle endurance training (RMET) slightly reduced in OB the O(2) cost of high‐intensity cycling and improved exercise tolerance. We hypothesized that during treadmill walking the effects of RMET would be more pronounced than those observed during cycling. Sixteen OB (age 16.0 ± 0.8 years; body mass [BM] 127.7 ± 14.2 kg; body mass index 40.7 ± 4.0 kg/m(2)) underwent to 3‐week RMET (n = 8) superimposed to a multidisciplinary BM reduction program, or (CTRL, n = 8) only to the latter. Heart rate (HR) and pulmonary O(2) uptake ([Formula: see text] O(2)) were measured during incremental exercise and 12‐min constant work rate (CWR) walking at 60% (moderate‐intensity, MOD) and 120% (heavy‐intensity, HEAVY) of the gas exchange threshold (GET). The O(2) cost of walking (aerobic energy expenditure per unit of covered distance) was calculated as [Formula: see text] O(2)/velocity. BM decreased (~4–5 kg) both in CTRL and in RMET. [Formula: see text] O(2)peak and GET were not affected by both interventions; the time to exhaustion increased following RMET. During MOD and HEAVY RMET decreased [Formula: see text] O(2,) the O(2) cost of walking (MOD: 0.130 ± 0.033 mL/kg/m [before] vs. 0.109 ± 0.027 [after], P = 0.03; HEAVY: 0.196 ± 0.031 [before] vs. 0.180 ± 0.025 [after], P = 0.02), HR and rates of perceived exertion; no significant changes were observed in CTRL. In OB a short RMET program lowered the O(2) cost of MOD and HEAVY walking and improved exercise tolerance. RMET could represent a useful adjunct in the control of obesity.