Cargando…
Oral fluorouracil vs vinorelbine plus cisplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II‐IIIA non‐small cell lung cancer: Propensity score‐matched and instrumental variable analyses
BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy with vinorelbine plus cisplatin (VNR/CDDP) is a standard regimen for treatment of postoperative stage II‐IIIA non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, oral fluorouracil offers a feasible alternative adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimen. We compared the prognoses of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6198210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30151905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1725 |
_version_ | 1783364921170329600 |
---|---|
author | Urushiyama, Hirokazu Jo, Taisuke Yasunaga, Hideo Michihata, Nobuaki Matsui, Hiroki Hasegawa, Wakae Takeshima, Hideyuki Sakamoto, Yukiyo Hiraishi, Yoshihisa Mitani, Akihisa Fushimi, Kiyohide Nagase, Takahide Yamauchi, Yasuhiro |
author_facet | Urushiyama, Hirokazu Jo, Taisuke Yasunaga, Hideo Michihata, Nobuaki Matsui, Hiroki Hasegawa, Wakae Takeshima, Hideyuki Sakamoto, Yukiyo Hiraishi, Yoshihisa Mitani, Akihisa Fushimi, Kiyohide Nagase, Takahide Yamauchi, Yasuhiro |
author_sort | Urushiyama, Hirokazu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy with vinorelbine plus cisplatin (VNR/CDDP) is a standard regimen for treatment of postoperative stage II‐IIIA non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, oral fluorouracil offers a feasible alternative adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimen. We compared the prognoses of patients with NSCLC treated with adjuvant chemotherapy with either VNR/CDDP or oral fluorouracil. METHODS: We identified patients with stage II‐IIIA NSCLC who underwent lung surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with VNR/CDDP (n = 384) or oral fluorouracil (n = 268) between July 2010 and March 2015, using the national Japanese inpatient and outpatient Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. We compared recurrence‐free survival between the groups by multivariable Cox regression analysis for one‐to‐one propensity score‐matched patients and by instrumental variable analysis. RESULTS: Younger patients and patients with positive N2 nodes were more likely to receive VNR/CDDP, while older patients and those with T3N0 classification were more likely to receive oral fluorouracil. Among 172 pairs of propensity‐matched patients, time to adjuvant chemotherapy was shorter for oral fluorouracil compared with VNR/CDDP. Oral fluorouracil was also significantly associated with improved recurrence‐free survival compared with VNR/CDDP, according to multivariable Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.26‐0.64). Instrumental variable analysis showed a similar relationship (hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.038‐0.92). CONCLUSIONS: On a large nationwide cohort, adjuvant chemotherapy with oral fluorouracil prolonged recurrence‐free survival in patients with postoperative stage II‐IIIA NSCLC, compared with VNR/CDDP. Oral fluorouracil may thus be a useful alternative to VNR/CDDP for the adjuvant treatment of these patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6198210 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61982102018-10-31 Oral fluorouracil vs vinorelbine plus cisplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II‐IIIA non‐small cell lung cancer: Propensity score‐matched and instrumental variable analyses Urushiyama, Hirokazu Jo, Taisuke Yasunaga, Hideo Michihata, Nobuaki Matsui, Hiroki Hasegawa, Wakae Takeshima, Hideyuki Sakamoto, Yukiyo Hiraishi, Yoshihisa Mitani, Akihisa Fushimi, Kiyohide Nagase, Takahide Yamauchi, Yasuhiro Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy with vinorelbine plus cisplatin (VNR/CDDP) is a standard regimen for treatment of postoperative stage II‐IIIA non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, oral fluorouracil offers a feasible alternative adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimen. We compared the prognoses of patients with NSCLC treated with adjuvant chemotherapy with either VNR/CDDP or oral fluorouracil. METHODS: We identified patients with stage II‐IIIA NSCLC who underwent lung surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with VNR/CDDP (n = 384) or oral fluorouracil (n = 268) between July 2010 and March 2015, using the national Japanese inpatient and outpatient Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. We compared recurrence‐free survival between the groups by multivariable Cox regression analysis for one‐to‐one propensity score‐matched patients and by instrumental variable analysis. RESULTS: Younger patients and patients with positive N2 nodes were more likely to receive VNR/CDDP, while older patients and those with T3N0 classification were more likely to receive oral fluorouracil. Among 172 pairs of propensity‐matched patients, time to adjuvant chemotherapy was shorter for oral fluorouracil compared with VNR/CDDP. Oral fluorouracil was also significantly associated with improved recurrence‐free survival compared with VNR/CDDP, according to multivariable Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.26‐0.64). Instrumental variable analysis showed a similar relationship (hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.038‐0.92). CONCLUSIONS: On a large nationwide cohort, adjuvant chemotherapy with oral fluorouracil prolonged recurrence‐free survival in patients with postoperative stage II‐IIIA NSCLC, compared with VNR/CDDP. Oral fluorouracil may thus be a useful alternative to VNR/CDDP for the adjuvant treatment of these patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6198210/ /pubmed/30151905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1725 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Cancer Research Urushiyama, Hirokazu Jo, Taisuke Yasunaga, Hideo Michihata, Nobuaki Matsui, Hiroki Hasegawa, Wakae Takeshima, Hideyuki Sakamoto, Yukiyo Hiraishi, Yoshihisa Mitani, Akihisa Fushimi, Kiyohide Nagase, Takahide Yamauchi, Yasuhiro Oral fluorouracil vs vinorelbine plus cisplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II‐IIIA non‐small cell lung cancer: Propensity score‐matched and instrumental variable analyses |
title | Oral fluorouracil vs vinorelbine plus cisplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II‐IIIA non‐small cell lung cancer: Propensity score‐matched and instrumental variable analyses |
title_full | Oral fluorouracil vs vinorelbine plus cisplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II‐IIIA non‐small cell lung cancer: Propensity score‐matched and instrumental variable analyses |
title_fullStr | Oral fluorouracil vs vinorelbine plus cisplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II‐IIIA non‐small cell lung cancer: Propensity score‐matched and instrumental variable analyses |
title_full_unstemmed | Oral fluorouracil vs vinorelbine plus cisplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II‐IIIA non‐small cell lung cancer: Propensity score‐matched and instrumental variable analyses |
title_short | Oral fluorouracil vs vinorelbine plus cisplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II‐IIIA non‐small cell lung cancer: Propensity score‐matched and instrumental variable analyses |
title_sort | oral fluorouracil vs vinorelbine plus cisplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage ii‐iiia non‐small cell lung cancer: propensity score‐matched and instrumental variable analyses |
topic | Clinical Cancer Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6198210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30151905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1725 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT urushiyamahirokazu oralfluorouracilvsvinorelbinepluscisplatinasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiianonsmallcelllungcancerpropensityscorematchedandinstrumentalvariableanalyses AT jotaisuke oralfluorouracilvsvinorelbinepluscisplatinasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiianonsmallcelllungcancerpropensityscorematchedandinstrumentalvariableanalyses AT yasunagahideo oralfluorouracilvsvinorelbinepluscisplatinasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiianonsmallcelllungcancerpropensityscorematchedandinstrumentalvariableanalyses AT michihatanobuaki oralfluorouracilvsvinorelbinepluscisplatinasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiianonsmallcelllungcancerpropensityscorematchedandinstrumentalvariableanalyses AT matsuihiroki oralfluorouracilvsvinorelbinepluscisplatinasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiianonsmallcelllungcancerpropensityscorematchedandinstrumentalvariableanalyses AT hasegawawakae oralfluorouracilvsvinorelbinepluscisplatinasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiianonsmallcelllungcancerpropensityscorematchedandinstrumentalvariableanalyses AT takeshimahideyuki oralfluorouracilvsvinorelbinepluscisplatinasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiianonsmallcelllungcancerpropensityscorematchedandinstrumentalvariableanalyses AT sakamotoyukiyo oralfluorouracilvsvinorelbinepluscisplatinasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiianonsmallcelllungcancerpropensityscorematchedandinstrumentalvariableanalyses AT hiraishiyoshihisa oralfluorouracilvsvinorelbinepluscisplatinasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiianonsmallcelllungcancerpropensityscorematchedandinstrumentalvariableanalyses AT mitaniakihisa oralfluorouracilvsvinorelbinepluscisplatinasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiianonsmallcelllungcancerpropensityscorematchedandinstrumentalvariableanalyses AT fushimikiyohide oralfluorouracilvsvinorelbinepluscisplatinasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiianonsmallcelllungcancerpropensityscorematchedandinstrumentalvariableanalyses AT nagasetakahide oralfluorouracilvsvinorelbinepluscisplatinasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiianonsmallcelllungcancerpropensityscorematchedandinstrumentalvariableanalyses AT yamauchiyasuhiro oralfluorouracilvsvinorelbinepluscisplatinasadjuvantchemotherapyforstageiiiiianonsmallcelllungcancerpropensityscorematchedandinstrumentalvariableanalyses |