Cargando…

Evaluation of Hybrid Arc and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy Treatment Plans for Fractionated Stereotactic Intracranial Radiotherapy

PURPOSE: The study was aimed to compare hybrid arc and volumetric-modulated arc therapy treatment plans for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of brain tumors. METHODS: Treatment plans of 22 patients were studied. Hybrid arc and volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans were generated using Brainla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jun, To, David, Gunn, Vickie, Shi, Wenyin, Yu, Yan, Liu, Haisong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6198396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30343652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033818802804
_version_ 1783364957367173120
author Li, Jun
To, David
Gunn, Vickie
Shi, Wenyin
Yu, Yan
Liu, Haisong
author_facet Li, Jun
To, David
Gunn, Vickie
Shi, Wenyin
Yu, Yan
Liu, Haisong
author_sort Li, Jun
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The study was aimed to compare hybrid arc and volumetric-modulated arc therapy treatment plans for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of brain tumors. METHODS: Treatment plans of 22 patients were studied. Hybrid arc and volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans were generated using Brainlab iPlanDose and Varian Eclipse treatment planning systems, respectively, with 6 MV photon beams on a Varian TrueBeam STx linear accelerator (Palo Alto, CA). Prescription dose was 54 Gy. The fractionation was 1.8 Gy per fraction and 30 fractions in total, or 2 Gy per fraction and 27 fractions in total. Planning target volume ranged from 2.4 to 28.6 cm(3). Dose conformity index, gradient index, homogeneity index, and maximum doses in organs at risk were compared. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to determine statistical significance in paired comparison. RESULTS: Conformity indexes of hybrid arc and volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans are 1.10 ± 0.10 and 1.14 ± 0.07, respectively (P = .4); gradient indexes are 5.02 ± 1.20 and 5.64 ± 1.28, respectively (P = .0001); homogeneity indexes are 1.02 ± 0.01 and 1.05 ± 0.01, respectively (P = .0001); brainstem maximum doses are 53.87 ± 1.63 Gy and 54.06 ± 3.17 Gy, respectively (P = .1); and optic chiasm maximum doses are 53.86 ± 1.28 Gy and 53.95 ± 1.81, respectively (P = .4). The monitor unit efficiencies of hybrid arc and volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans are 2.57 ± 0.25 MU/cGy and 2.68 ± 0.24 MU/cGy, respectively (P = .2). The differences of conformity index, gradient index, and homogeneity index between hybrid arc and volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans are small: 0.08 ± 0.05, 0.65 ± 0.46, and 0.02 ± 0.01, respectively. The maximum doses in organs at risks are similar between hybrid arc and volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans. Hybrid arc and volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans, which have similar monitor unit efficiencies, present similar dosimetric results in the fractionated intracranial radiotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6198396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61983962018-10-24 Evaluation of Hybrid Arc and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy Treatment Plans for Fractionated Stereotactic Intracranial Radiotherapy Li, Jun To, David Gunn, Vickie Shi, Wenyin Yu, Yan Liu, Haisong Technol Cancer Res Treat Original Article PURPOSE: The study was aimed to compare hybrid arc and volumetric-modulated arc therapy treatment plans for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of brain tumors. METHODS: Treatment plans of 22 patients were studied. Hybrid arc and volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans were generated using Brainlab iPlanDose and Varian Eclipse treatment planning systems, respectively, with 6 MV photon beams on a Varian TrueBeam STx linear accelerator (Palo Alto, CA). Prescription dose was 54 Gy. The fractionation was 1.8 Gy per fraction and 30 fractions in total, or 2 Gy per fraction and 27 fractions in total. Planning target volume ranged from 2.4 to 28.6 cm(3). Dose conformity index, gradient index, homogeneity index, and maximum doses in organs at risk were compared. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to determine statistical significance in paired comparison. RESULTS: Conformity indexes of hybrid arc and volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans are 1.10 ± 0.10 and 1.14 ± 0.07, respectively (P = .4); gradient indexes are 5.02 ± 1.20 and 5.64 ± 1.28, respectively (P = .0001); homogeneity indexes are 1.02 ± 0.01 and 1.05 ± 0.01, respectively (P = .0001); brainstem maximum doses are 53.87 ± 1.63 Gy and 54.06 ± 3.17 Gy, respectively (P = .1); and optic chiasm maximum doses are 53.86 ± 1.28 Gy and 53.95 ± 1.81, respectively (P = .4). The monitor unit efficiencies of hybrid arc and volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans are 2.57 ± 0.25 MU/cGy and 2.68 ± 0.24 MU/cGy, respectively (P = .2). The differences of conformity index, gradient index, and homogeneity index between hybrid arc and volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans are small: 0.08 ± 0.05, 0.65 ± 0.46, and 0.02 ± 0.01, respectively. The maximum doses in organs at risks are similar between hybrid arc and volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans. Hybrid arc and volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans, which have similar monitor unit efficiencies, present similar dosimetric results in the fractionated intracranial radiotherapy. SAGE Publications 2018-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6198396/ /pubmed/30343652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033818802804 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Li, Jun
To, David
Gunn, Vickie
Shi, Wenyin
Yu, Yan
Liu, Haisong
Evaluation of Hybrid Arc and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy Treatment Plans for Fractionated Stereotactic Intracranial Radiotherapy
title Evaluation of Hybrid Arc and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy Treatment Plans for Fractionated Stereotactic Intracranial Radiotherapy
title_full Evaluation of Hybrid Arc and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy Treatment Plans for Fractionated Stereotactic Intracranial Radiotherapy
title_fullStr Evaluation of Hybrid Arc and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy Treatment Plans for Fractionated Stereotactic Intracranial Radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Hybrid Arc and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy Treatment Plans for Fractionated Stereotactic Intracranial Radiotherapy
title_short Evaluation of Hybrid Arc and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy Treatment Plans for Fractionated Stereotactic Intracranial Radiotherapy
title_sort evaluation of hybrid arc and volumetric-modulated arc therapy treatment plans for fractionated stereotactic intracranial radiotherapy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6198396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30343652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033818802804
work_keys_str_mv AT lijun evaluationofhybridarcandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytreatmentplansforfractionatedstereotacticintracranialradiotherapy
AT todavid evaluationofhybridarcandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytreatmentplansforfractionatedstereotacticintracranialradiotherapy
AT gunnvickie evaluationofhybridarcandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytreatmentplansforfractionatedstereotacticintracranialradiotherapy
AT shiwenyin evaluationofhybridarcandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytreatmentplansforfractionatedstereotacticintracranialradiotherapy
AT yuyan evaluationofhybridarcandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytreatmentplansforfractionatedstereotacticintracranialradiotherapy
AT liuhaisong evaluationofhybridarcandvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytreatmentplansforfractionatedstereotacticintracranialradiotherapy