Cargando…

Effectiveness of interventions for treating apophysitis in children and adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Overuse injuries are reported to be more common than acute trauma in children and adolescents, causing pain and reduced function. The most common is apophysitis - a traction injury to the apophysis in growing individuals. The duration of symptoms reported in the literature is between 6 w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Midtiby, Stig L., Wedderkopp, Niels, Larsen, Rasmus T., Carlsen, Anne-Marie Fiala, Mavridis, Dimitris, Shrier, Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6198434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-018-0209-8
_version_ 1783364965771509760
author Midtiby, Stig L.
Wedderkopp, Niels
Larsen, Rasmus T.
Carlsen, Anne-Marie Fiala
Mavridis, Dimitris
Shrier, Ian
author_facet Midtiby, Stig L.
Wedderkopp, Niels
Larsen, Rasmus T.
Carlsen, Anne-Marie Fiala
Mavridis, Dimitris
Shrier, Ian
author_sort Midtiby, Stig L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Overuse injuries are reported to be more common than acute trauma in children and adolescents, causing pain and reduced function. The most common is apophysitis - a traction injury to the apophysis in growing individuals. The duration of symptoms reported in the literature is between 6 weeks to 6 months or more. The objective of this systematic review and network meta-analysis is to compare the effectiveness and safety of all available treatments for any type of apophysitis in children and adolescents. METHODS/DESIGN: We will conduct a systematic review to retrieve all relevant studies applying a comparative design. Searches will be made in the Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and SportDiscus databases and via reference searching. The efficacy of treatments will be compared with respect to the outcomes 1) time to pain-free activity and 2) risk of subsequent injury. Risk of bias assessment will be made using revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials for Randomized trials and Robins-I tool for non-randomized trials. We will explore if different treatment comparisons are sufficiently similar in terms of effect modifiers (transitivity assumption) with the aim to conduct network meta-analyses for randomized and non-randomized studies separately. A treatment hierarchy will be obtained using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) and mean ranks, visualized using rankograms. We will use the CINeMA software to apply the modified version of Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), developed specifically to evaluate the quality of evidence in network meta-analysis. DISCUSSION: To date the comparative effects of interventions for apophysitis seem to rely mainly on expert opinion. We aim to identify all comparative treatment designs described in the literature and synthesize data when possible. We will use the estimated treatment effects between injury locations to provide guidance in managing apophysitis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO ID number: CRD42018083746. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12998-018-0209-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6198434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61984342018-10-31 Effectiveness of interventions for treating apophysitis in children and adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis Midtiby, Stig L. Wedderkopp, Niels Larsen, Rasmus T. Carlsen, Anne-Marie Fiala Mavridis, Dimitris Shrier, Ian Chiropr Man Therap Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Overuse injuries are reported to be more common than acute trauma in children and adolescents, causing pain and reduced function. The most common is apophysitis - a traction injury to the apophysis in growing individuals. The duration of symptoms reported in the literature is between 6 weeks to 6 months or more. The objective of this systematic review and network meta-analysis is to compare the effectiveness and safety of all available treatments for any type of apophysitis in children and adolescents. METHODS/DESIGN: We will conduct a systematic review to retrieve all relevant studies applying a comparative design. Searches will be made in the Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and SportDiscus databases and via reference searching. The efficacy of treatments will be compared with respect to the outcomes 1) time to pain-free activity and 2) risk of subsequent injury. Risk of bias assessment will be made using revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials for Randomized trials and Robins-I tool for non-randomized trials. We will explore if different treatment comparisons are sufficiently similar in terms of effect modifiers (transitivity assumption) with the aim to conduct network meta-analyses for randomized and non-randomized studies separately. A treatment hierarchy will be obtained using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) and mean ranks, visualized using rankograms. We will use the CINeMA software to apply the modified version of Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), developed specifically to evaluate the quality of evidence in network meta-analysis. DISCUSSION: To date the comparative effects of interventions for apophysitis seem to rely mainly on expert opinion. We aim to identify all comparative treatment designs described in the literature and synthesize data when possible. We will use the estimated treatment effects between injury locations to provide guidance in managing apophysitis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO ID number: CRD42018083746. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12998-018-0209-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6198434/ /pubmed/30386556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-018-0209-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Midtiby, Stig L.
Wedderkopp, Niels
Larsen, Rasmus T.
Carlsen, Anne-Marie Fiala
Mavridis, Dimitris
Shrier, Ian
Effectiveness of interventions for treating apophysitis in children and adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title Effectiveness of interventions for treating apophysitis in children and adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full Effectiveness of interventions for treating apophysitis in children and adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effectiveness of interventions for treating apophysitis in children and adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of interventions for treating apophysitis in children and adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_short Effectiveness of interventions for treating apophysitis in children and adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_sort effectiveness of interventions for treating apophysitis in children and adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6198434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30386556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-018-0209-8
work_keys_str_mv AT midtibystigl effectivenessofinterventionsfortreatingapophysitisinchildrenandadolescentsprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT wedderkoppniels effectivenessofinterventionsfortreatingapophysitisinchildrenandadolescentsprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT larsenrasmust effectivenessofinterventionsfortreatingapophysitisinchildrenandadolescentsprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT carlsenannemariefiala effectivenessofinterventionsfortreatingapophysitisinchildrenandadolescentsprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT mavridisdimitris effectivenessofinterventionsfortreatingapophysitisinchildrenandadolescentsprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT shrierian effectivenessofinterventionsfortreatingapophysitisinchildrenandadolescentsprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis