Cargando…
Knowledge translation for realist reviews: a participatory approach for a review on scaling up complex interventions
BACKGROUND: Knowledge syntheses that use a realist methodology are gaining popularity. Yet, there are few reports in the literature that describe how results are summarised, shared and used. This paper aims to inform knowledge translation (KT) for realist reviews by describing the process of develop...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6198505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30348180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0374-1 |
_version_ | 1783364978279972864 |
---|---|
author | Boyko, Jennifer A. Riley, Barbara L. Willis, Cameron D. Stockton, Lisa Zummach, Dana Kerner, Jon Robinson, Kerry Chia, Marie |
author_facet | Boyko, Jennifer A. Riley, Barbara L. Willis, Cameron D. Stockton, Lisa Zummach, Dana Kerner, Jon Robinson, Kerry Chia, Marie |
author_sort | Boyko, Jennifer A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Knowledge syntheses that use a realist methodology are gaining popularity. Yet, there are few reports in the literature that describe how results are summarised, shared and used. This paper aims to inform knowledge translation (KT) for realist reviews by describing the process of developing a KT strategy for a review on pathways for scaling up complex public health interventions. METHODS: The participatory approach used for the realist review was also used to develop the KT strategy. The approach included three main steps, namely (1) an international meeting focused on interpreting preliminary findings from the realist review and seeking input on KT activities; (2) a targeted literature review on KT for realist reviews; and (3) consultations with primary knowledge users of the review. RESULTS: The international meeting identified a general preference among knowledge users for findings from the review that are action oriented. A need was also identified for understanding how to tailor findings for specific knowledge user groups in relation to their needs. The literature review identified four papers that included brief descriptions of planned or actual KT activities for specific research studies; however, information was minimal on what KT activities or products work for whom, under what conditions and why. The consultations revealed that KT for realist reviews should consider the following: (1) activities closely aligned with the preferences of specific knowledge user groups; (2) key findings that are sensitive to factors within the knowledge user’s context; and (3) actionable statements that can advance KT goals, activities or products. The KT strategy derived from the three activities includes a planning framework and tailored KT activities that address preferences of knowledge users for findings that are action oriented and context relevant. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides an example of a KT strategy for realist reviews that blends theoretical and practical insights. Evaluation of the strategy’s implementation will provide useful insights on its effectiveness and potential for broader application. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-018-0374-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6198505 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61985052018-10-31 Knowledge translation for realist reviews: a participatory approach for a review on scaling up complex interventions Boyko, Jennifer A. Riley, Barbara L. Willis, Cameron D. Stockton, Lisa Zummach, Dana Kerner, Jon Robinson, Kerry Chia, Marie Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Knowledge syntheses that use a realist methodology are gaining popularity. Yet, there are few reports in the literature that describe how results are summarised, shared and used. This paper aims to inform knowledge translation (KT) for realist reviews by describing the process of developing a KT strategy for a review on pathways for scaling up complex public health interventions. METHODS: The participatory approach used for the realist review was also used to develop the KT strategy. The approach included three main steps, namely (1) an international meeting focused on interpreting preliminary findings from the realist review and seeking input on KT activities; (2) a targeted literature review on KT for realist reviews; and (3) consultations with primary knowledge users of the review. RESULTS: The international meeting identified a general preference among knowledge users for findings from the review that are action oriented. A need was also identified for understanding how to tailor findings for specific knowledge user groups in relation to their needs. The literature review identified four papers that included brief descriptions of planned or actual KT activities for specific research studies; however, information was minimal on what KT activities or products work for whom, under what conditions and why. The consultations revealed that KT for realist reviews should consider the following: (1) activities closely aligned with the preferences of specific knowledge user groups; (2) key findings that are sensitive to factors within the knowledge user’s context; and (3) actionable statements that can advance KT goals, activities or products. The KT strategy derived from the three activities includes a planning framework and tailored KT activities that address preferences of knowledge users for findings that are action oriented and context relevant. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides an example of a KT strategy for realist reviews that blends theoretical and practical insights. Evaluation of the strategy’s implementation will provide useful insights on its effectiveness and potential for broader application. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-018-0374-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6198505/ /pubmed/30348180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0374-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Boyko, Jennifer A. Riley, Barbara L. Willis, Cameron D. Stockton, Lisa Zummach, Dana Kerner, Jon Robinson, Kerry Chia, Marie Knowledge translation for realist reviews: a participatory approach for a review on scaling up complex interventions |
title | Knowledge translation for realist reviews: a participatory approach for a review on scaling up complex interventions |
title_full | Knowledge translation for realist reviews: a participatory approach for a review on scaling up complex interventions |
title_fullStr | Knowledge translation for realist reviews: a participatory approach for a review on scaling up complex interventions |
title_full_unstemmed | Knowledge translation for realist reviews: a participatory approach for a review on scaling up complex interventions |
title_short | Knowledge translation for realist reviews: a participatory approach for a review on scaling up complex interventions |
title_sort | knowledge translation for realist reviews: a participatory approach for a review on scaling up complex interventions |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6198505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30348180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0374-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boykojennifera knowledgetranslationforrealistreviewsaparticipatoryapproachforareviewonscalingupcomplexinterventions AT rileybarbaral knowledgetranslationforrealistreviewsaparticipatoryapproachforareviewonscalingupcomplexinterventions AT williscamerond knowledgetranslationforrealistreviewsaparticipatoryapproachforareviewonscalingupcomplexinterventions AT stocktonlisa knowledgetranslationforrealistreviewsaparticipatoryapproachforareviewonscalingupcomplexinterventions AT zummachdana knowledgetranslationforrealistreviewsaparticipatoryapproachforareviewonscalingupcomplexinterventions AT kernerjon knowledgetranslationforrealistreviewsaparticipatoryapproachforareviewonscalingupcomplexinterventions AT robinsonkerry knowledgetranslationforrealistreviewsaparticipatoryapproachforareviewonscalingupcomplexinterventions AT chiamarie knowledgetranslationforrealistreviewsaparticipatoryapproachforareviewonscalingupcomplexinterventions |