Cargando…

What utility scores do mental health service users, healthcare professionals and members of the general public attribute to different health states? A co-produced mixed methods online survey

BACKGROUND: Utility scores are integral to health economics decision-making. Typically, utility scores have not been scored or developed with mental health service users. The aims of this study were to i) collaborate with service users to develop descriptions of five mental health states (psychosis,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flood, Chris, Barlow, Sally, Simpson, Alan, Burls, Amanda, Price, Amy, Cartwright, Martin, Brini, Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6198969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30352071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205223
_version_ 1783365050066534400
author Flood, Chris
Barlow, Sally
Simpson, Alan
Burls, Amanda
Price, Amy
Cartwright, Martin
Brini, Stefano
author_facet Flood, Chris
Barlow, Sally
Simpson, Alan
Burls, Amanda
Price, Amy
Cartwright, Martin
Brini, Stefano
author_sort Flood, Chris
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Utility scores are integral to health economics decision-making. Typically, utility scores have not been scored or developed with mental health service users. The aims of this study were to i) collaborate with service users to develop descriptions of five mental health states (psychosis, depression, eating disorder, medication side effects and self-harm); ii) explore feasibility and acceptability of using scenario-based health states in an e-survey; iii) evaluate which utility measures (standard gamble (SG), time trade off (TTO) and rating scale (RS)) are preferred; and iv) determine how different participant groups discriminate between the health scenarios and rank them. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a co-produced mixed methods cross-sectional online survey. Utility scores were generated using the SG, TTO and RS methods; difficulty of the completing each method, markers of acceptability and participants’ preference were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 119 participants (58%) fully completed the survey. For any given health state, SG consistently generated higher utility scores compared to RS and for some health states higher also than TTO (i.e. SG produces inflated utility scores relative to RS and TTO). Results suggest that different utility measures produce different evaluations of described health states. The TTO was preferred by all participant groups over the SG. The three participant groups scored four (of five) health scenarios comparably. Psychosis scored as the worst health state to live with while medication side-effects were viewed more positively than other scenarios (depression, eating disorders, self-harm) by all participant groups. However, there was a difference in how the depression scenario was scored, with service users giving depression a lower utility score compared to other groups. CONCLUSION: Mental health state scenarios used to generate utility scores can be co-produced and are well received by a broad range of participants. Utility valuations using SG, TTO and RS were feasible for use with service users, carers, healthcare professionals and members of the general public. Future studies of utility scores in psychiatry should aim to include mental health service users as both co-investigators and respondents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6198969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61989692018-11-19 What utility scores do mental health service users, healthcare professionals and members of the general public attribute to different health states? A co-produced mixed methods online survey Flood, Chris Barlow, Sally Simpson, Alan Burls, Amanda Price, Amy Cartwright, Martin Brini, Stefano PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Utility scores are integral to health economics decision-making. Typically, utility scores have not been scored or developed with mental health service users. The aims of this study were to i) collaborate with service users to develop descriptions of five mental health states (psychosis, depression, eating disorder, medication side effects and self-harm); ii) explore feasibility and acceptability of using scenario-based health states in an e-survey; iii) evaluate which utility measures (standard gamble (SG), time trade off (TTO) and rating scale (RS)) are preferred; and iv) determine how different participant groups discriminate between the health scenarios and rank them. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a co-produced mixed methods cross-sectional online survey. Utility scores were generated using the SG, TTO and RS methods; difficulty of the completing each method, markers of acceptability and participants’ preference were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 119 participants (58%) fully completed the survey. For any given health state, SG consistently generated higher utility scores compared to RS and for some health states higher also than TTO (i.e. SG produces inflated utility scores relative to RS and TTO). Results suggest that different utility measures produce different evaluations of described health states. The TTO was preferred by all participant groups over the SG. The three participant groups scored four (of five) health scenarios comparably. Psychosis scored as the worst health state to live with while medication side-effects were viewed more positively than other scenarios (depression, eating disorders, self-harm) by all participant groups. However, there was a difference in how the depression scenario was scored, with service users giving depression a lower utility score compared to other groups. CONCLUSION: Mental health state scenarios used to generate utility scores can be co-produced and are well received by a broad range of participants. Utility valuations using SG, TTO and RS were feasible for use with service users, carers, healthcare professionals and members of the general public. Future studies of utility scores in psychiatry should aim to include mental health service users as both co-investigators and respondents. Public Library of Science 2018-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6198969/ /pubmed/30352071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205223 Text en © 2018 Flood et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Flood, Chris
Barlow, Sally
Simpson, Alan
Burls, Amanda
Price, Amy
Cartwright, Martin
Brini, Stefano
What utility scores do mental health service users, healthcare professionals and members of the general public attribute to different health states? A co-produced mixed methods online survey
title What utility scores do mental health service users, healthcare professionals and members of the general public attribute to different health states? A co-produced mixed methods online survey
title_full What utility scores do mental health service users, healthcare professionals and members of the general public attribute to different health states? A co-produced mixed methods online survey
title_fullStr What utility scores do mental health service users, healthcare professionals and members of the general public attribute to different health states? A co-produced mixed methods online survey
title_full_unstemmed What utility scores do mental health service users, healthcare professionals and members of the general public attribute to different health states? A co-produced mixed methods online survey
title_short What utility scores do mental health service users, healthcare professionals and members of the general public attribute to different health states? A co-produced mixed methods online survey
title_sort what utility scores do mental health service users, healthcare professionals and members of the general public attribute to different health states? a co-produced mixed methods online survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6198969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30352071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205223
work_keys_str_mv AT floodchris whatutilityscoresdomentalhealthserviceusershealthcareprofessionalsandmembersofthegeneralpublicattributetodifferenthealthstatesacoproducedmixedmethodsonlinesurvey
AT barlowsally whatutilityscoresdomentalhealthserviceusershealthcareprofessionalsandmembersofthegeneralpublicattributetodifferenthealthstatesacoproducedmixedmethodsonlinesurvey
AT simpsonalan whatutilityscoresdomentalhealthserviceusershealthcareprofessionalsandmembersofthegeneralpublicattributetodifferenthealthstatesacoproducedmixedmethodsonlinesurvey
AT burlsamanda whatutilityscoresdomentalhealthserviceusershealthcareprofessionalsandmembersofthegeneralpublicattributetodifferenthealthstatesacoproducedmixedmethodsonlinesurvey
AT priceamy whatutilityscoresdomentalhealthserviceusershealthcareprofessionalsandmembersofthegeneralpublicattributetodifferenthealthstatesacoproducedmixedmethodsonlinesurvey
AT cartwrightmartin whatutilityscoresdomentalhealthserviceusershealthcareprofessionalsandmembersofthegeneralpublicattributetodifferenthealthstatesacoproducedmixedmethodsonlinesurvey
AT brinistefano whatutilityscoresdomentalhealthserviceusershealthcareprofessionalsandmembersofthegeneralpublicattributetodifferenthealthstatesacoproducedmixedmethodsonlinesurvey
AT whatutilityscoresdomentalhealthserviceusershealthcareprofessionalsandmembersofthegeneralpublicattributetodifferenthealthstatesacoproducedmixedmethodsonlinesurvey