Cargando…

Farmer Perceptions and Responses to Soil Degradation in Swaziland

Soil degradation is globally concerning due to its adverse effects on the environment and agricultural production. Much of Swaziland is at risk from degradation. This paper assesses farmer perceptions and responses to soil degradation in 2002 and 2014, focusing on two land uses that underpin rural l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orchard, Steven E., Stringer, Lindsay C., Manyatsi, Absalom M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6199004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30393450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2595
_version_ 1783365058522251264
author Orchard, Steven E.
Stringer, Lindsay C.
Manyatsi, Absalom M.
author_facet Orchard, Steven E.
Stringer, Lindsay C.
Manyatsi, Absalom M.
author_sort Orchard, Steven E.
collection PubMed
description Soil degradation is globally concerning due to its adverse effects on the environment and agricultural production. Much of Swaziland is at risk from degradation. This paper assesses farmer perceptions and responses to soil degradation in 2002 and 2014, focusing on two land uses that underpin rural livelihoods: arable land and rangeland areas. It uses repeat household surveys and semi‐structured interviews, in two case study chiefdoms in the country's middleveld (KaBhudla and Engcayini) in the first longitudinal study of its kind. We find that observations of land degradation are perceived mainly through changes in land productivity, with chemical degradation occurring predominantly on arable land and physical degradation and erosion mainly in rangeland areas. Changes in rainfall are particularly important in determining responses. While perceptions of the causes and impacts of degradation largely concur with the scientific literature, responses were constrained by poor land availability, shorter and more unpredictable cropping seasons because of changing rains and low awareness, access to or knowledge of agricultural inputs. We suggest that sustainable arable land management can be enhanced through improved access to alternative sources of water, use of management practices that retain soil and moisture and greater access to agricultural inputs and capacity building to ensure their appropriate use. We suggest collaborative management for settlement planning that integrates soil conservation and livestock management strategies such as controlled stocking levels and rotational grazing could improve land quality in rangeland areas. Together, these approaches can help land users to better manage change. © 2016 The Authors. Land Degradation & Development published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6199004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61990042018-10-31 Farmer Perceptions and Responses to Soil Degradation in Swaziland Orchard, Steven E. Stringer, Lindsay C. Manyatsi, Absalom M. Land Degrad Dev Research Articles Soil degradation is globally concerning due to its adverse effects on the environment and agricultural production. Much of Swaziland is at risk from degradation. This paper assesses farmer perceptions and responses to soil degradation in 2002 and 2014, focusing on two land uses that underpin rural livelihoods: arable land and rangeland areas. It uses repeat household surveys and semi‐structured interviews, in two case study chiefdoms in the country's middleveld (KaBhudla and Engcayini) in the first longitudinal study of its kind. We find that observations of land degradation are perceived mainly through changes in land productivity, with chemical degradation occurring predominantly on arable land and physical degradation and erosion mainly in rangeland areas. Changes in rainfall are particularly important in determining responses. While perceptions of the causes and impacts of degradation largely concur with the scientific literature, responses were constrained by poor land availability, shorter and more unpredictable cropping seasons because of changing rains and low awareness, access to or knowledge of agricultural inputs. We suggest that sustainable arable land management can be enhanced through improved access to alternative sources of water, use of management practices that retain soil and moisture and greater access to agricultural inputs and capacity building to ensure their appropriate use. We suggest collaborative management for settlement planning that integrates soil conservation and livestock management strategies such as controlled stocking levels and rotational grazing could improve land quality in rangeland areas. Together, these approaches can help land users to better manage change. © 2016 The Authors. Land Degradation & Development published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-09-13 2017-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6199004/ /pubmed/30393450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2595 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Land Degradation & Development published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Orchard, Steven E.
Stringer, Lindsay C.
Manyatsi, Absalom M.
Farmer Perceptions and Responses to Soil Degradation in Swaziland
title Farmer Perceptions and Responses to Soil Degradation in Swaziland
title_full Farmer Perceptions and Responses to Soil Degradation in Swaziland
title_fullStr Farmer Perceptions and Responses to Soil Degradation in Swaziland
title_full_unstemmed Farmer Perceptions and Responses to Soil Degradation in Swaziland
title_short Farmer Perceptions and Responses to Soil Degradation in Swaziland
title_sort farmer perceptions and responses to soil degradation in swaziland
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6199004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30393450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2595
work_keys_str_mv AT orchardstevene farmerperceptionsandresponsestosoildegradationinswaziland
AT stringerlindsayc farmerperceptionsandresponsestosoildegradationinswaziland
AT manyatsiabsalomm farmerperceptionsandresponsestosoildegradationinswaziland