Cargando…
Home administration of filgrastim (Nivestim™) in primary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia
BACKGROUND: The granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) biosimilar filgrastim (Nivestim™) reduces the duration and severity of neutropenia and the frequency of occurrence of febrile neutropenia (FN). Administration of this biosimilar filgrastim and the patient population receiving it at home h...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6199230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30410313 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S168029 |
_version_ | 1783365098618748928 |
---|---|
author | Otremba, Burkhard Hielscher, Carsten Petersen, Volker Petrik, Christian |
author_facet | Otremba, Burkhard Hielscher, Carsten Petersen, Volker Petrik, Christian |
author_sort | Otremba, Burkhard |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) biosimilar filgrastim (Nivestim™) reduces the duration and severity of neutropenia and the frequency of occurrence of febrile neutropenia (FN). Administration of this biosimilar filgrastim and the patient population receiving it at home have not been sufficiently documented in day-to-day medical practice. Insight into home administration may help optimize the management of FN in this setting, potentially at a reduced cost and patient burden vs hospital administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, non-interventional, non-comparative, multisite study involving 171 patients across 29 sites treated with at least one dose of filgrastim. Mean age was 59.3 years, and most patients were female and G-CSF-naïve. The data collected originated from paper-based patient questionnaires and routine documentation by the treating physicians. The primary endpoint was the characterization of patients treated with filgrastim. Secondary endpoints were satisfaction with filgrastim, effectiveness, safety and tolerability, and compliance with prescription. RESULTS: Most patients had solid tumors (95.9%), mainly located in the breast, while 4.7% had malignant hematological disease. Solid tumors were recorded as grade 1 (7.9%), grade 2 (28.0%), grade 3 (45.7%), and grade 4 (3.0%), and the majority of patients classified at TNM Stages I and II. Many patients (71.0%) could self-inject filgrastim and 72.2% found the handling instructions “extremely straightforward and easy to understand” at least once. Nearly all (99.4%) patients found the syringes “easy to use” at least once and 91.7% were willing to continue home administration. The mean patient satisfaction score for home administration was 1.9±0.9, ranging from 1 (very satisfied) to 6 (absolutely dissatisfied). No cases of neutropenia were observed and only one event of FN occurred. CONCLUSION: Home-based prophylaxis for FN with filgrastim was found to be effective, well tolerated, and well received by patients (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02956967). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6199230 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61992302018-11-08 Home administration of filgrastim (Nivestim™) in primary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia Otremba, Burkhard Hielscher, Carsten Petersen, Volker Petrik, Christian Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research BACKGROUND: The granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) biosimilar filgrastim (Nivestim™) reduces the duration and severity of neutropenia and the frequency of occurrence of febrile neutropenia (FN). Administration of this biosimilar filgrastim and the patient population receiving it at home have not been sufficiently documented in day-to-day medical practice. Insight into home administration may help optimize the management of FN in this setting, potentially at a reduced cost and patient burden vs hospital administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, non-interventional, non-comparative, multisite study involving 171 patients across 29 sites treated with at least one dose of filgrastim. Mean age was 59.3 years, and most patients were female and G-CSF-naïve. The data collected originated from paper-based patient questionnaires and routine documentation by the treating physicians. The primary endpoint was the characterization of patients treated with filgrastim. Secondary endpoints were satisfaction with filgrastim, effectiveness, safety and tolerability, and compliance with prescription. RESULTS: Most patients had solid tumors (95.9%), mainly located in the breast, while 4.7% had malignant hematological disease. Solid tumors were recorded as grade 1 (7.9%), grade 2 (28.0%), grade 3 (45.7%), and grade 4 (3.0%), and the majority of patients classified at TNM Stages I and II. Many patients (71.0%) could self-inject filgrastim and 72.2% found the handling instructions “extremely straightforward and easy to understand” at least once. Nearly all (99.4%) patients found the syringes “easy to use” at least once and 91.7% were willing to continue home administration. The mean patient satisfaction score for home administration was 1.9±0.9, ranging from 1 (very satisfied) to 6 (absolutely dissatisfied). No cases of neutropenia were observed and only one event of FN occurred. CONCLUSION: Home-based prophylaxis for FN with filgrastim was found to be effective, well tolerated, and well received by patients (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02956967). Dove Medical Press 2018-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6199230/ /pubmed/30410313 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S168029 Text en © 2018 Otremba et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Otremba, Burkhard Hielscher, Carsten Petersen, Volker Petrik, Christian Home administration of filgrastim (Nivestim™) in primary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia |
title | Home administration of filgrastim (Nivestim™) in primary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia |
title_full | Home administration of filgrastim (Nivestim™) in primary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia |
title_fullStr | Home administration of filgrastim (Nivestim™) in primary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia |
title_full_unstemmed | Home administration of filgrastim (Nivestim™) in primary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia |
title_short | Home administration of filgrastim (Nivestim™) in primary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia |
title_sort | home administration of filgrastim (nivestim™) in primary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6199230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30410313 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S168029 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT otrembaburkhard homeadministrationoffilgrastimnivestiminprimaryprophylaxisofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropenia AT hielschercarsten homeadministrationoffilgrastimnivestiminprimaryprophylaxisofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropenia AT petersenvolker homeadministrationoffilgrastimnivestiminprimaryprophylaxisofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropenia AT petrikchristian homeadministrationoffilgrastimnivestiminprimaryprophylaxisofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropenia |