Cargando…
Molecular mechanism of substrate selectivity of the arginine-agmatine Antiporter AdiC
The arginine-agmatine antiporter (AdiC) is a component of an acid resistance system developed by enteric bacteria to resist gastric acidity. In order to avoid neutral proton antiport, the monovalent form of arginine, about as abundant as its divalent form under acidic conditions, should be selective...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6199258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30353119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33963-1 |
_version_ | 1783365105237360640 |
---|---|
author | Krammer, Eva-Maria Gibbons, Andrew Roos, Goedele Prévost, Martine |
author_facet | Krammer, Eva-Maria Gibbons, Andrew Roos, Goedele Prévost, Martine |
author_sort | Krammer, Eva-Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | The arginine-agmatine antiporter (AdiC) is a component of an acid resistance system developed by enteric bacteria to resist gastric acidity. In order to avoid neutral proton antiport, the monovalent form of arginine, about as abundant as its divalent form under acidic conditions, should be selectively bound by AdiC for transport into the cytosol. In this study, we shed light on the mechanism through which AdiC distinguishes Arg(+) from Arg(2+) of arginine by investigating the binding of both forms in addition to that of divalent agmatine, using a combination of molecular dynamics simulations with molecular and quantum mechanics calculations. We show that AdiC indeed preferentially binds Arg(+). The weaker binding of divalent compounds results mostly from their greater tendency to remain hydrated than Arg(+). Our data suggests that the binding of Arg(+) promotes the deprotonation of Glu208, a gating residue, which in turn reinforces its interactions with AdiC, leading to longer residence times of Arg(+) in the binding site. Although the total electric charge of the ligand appears to be the determinant factor in the discrimination process, two local interactions formed with Trp293, another gating residue of the binding site, also contribute to the selection mechanism: a cation-π interaction with the guanidinium group of Arg(+) and an anion-π interaction involving Glu208. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6199258 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61992582018-10-25 Molecular mechanism of substrate selectivity of the arginine-agmatine Antiporter AdiC Krammer, Eva-Maria Gibbons, Andrew Roos, Goedele Prévost, Martine Sci Rep Article The arginine-agmatine antiporter (AdiC) is a component of an acid resistance system developed by enteric bacteria to resist gastric acidity. In order to avoid neutral proton antiport, the monovalent form of arginine, about as abundant as its divalent form under acidic conditions, should be selectively bound by AdiC for transport into the cytosol. In this study, we shed light on the mechanism through which AdiC distinguishes Arg(+) from Arg(2+) of arginine by investigating the binding of both forms in addition to that of divalent agmatine, using a combination of molecular dynamics simulations with molecular and quantum mechanics calculations. We show that AdiC indeed preferentially binds Arg(+). The weaker binding of divalent compounds results mostly from their greater tendency to remain hydrated than Arg(+). Our data suggests that the binding of Arg(+) promotes the deprotonation of Glu208, a gating residue, which in turn reinforces its interactions with AdiC, leading to longer residence times of Arg(+) in the binding site. Although the total electric charge of the ligand appears to be the determinant factor in the discrimination process, two local interactions formed with Trp293, another gating residue of the binding site, also contribute to the selection mechanism: a cation-π interaction with the guanidinium group of Arg(+) and an anion-π interaction involving Glu208. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6199258/ /pubmed/30353119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33963-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Krammer, Eva-Maria Gibbons, Andrew Roos, Goedele Prévost, Martine Molecular mechanism of substrate selectivity of the arginine-agmatine Antiporter AdiC |
title | Molecular mechanism of substrate selectivity of the arginine-agmatine Antiporter AdiC |
title_full | Molecular mechanism of substrate selectivity of the arginine-agmatine Antiporter AdiC |
title_fullStr | Molecular mechanism of substrate selectivity of the arginine-agmatine Antiporter AdiC |
title_full_unstemmed | Molecular mechanism of substrate selectivity of the arginine-agmatine Antiporter AdiC |
title_short | Molecular mechanism of substrate selectivity of the arginine-agmatine Antiporter AdiC |
title_sort | molecular mechanism of substrate selectivity of the arginine-agmatine antiporter adic |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6199258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30353119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33963-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krammerevamaria molecularmechanismofsubstrateselectivityofthearginineagmatineantiporteradic AT gibbonsandrew molecularmechanismofsubstrateselectivityofthearginineagmatineantiporteradic AT roosgoedele molecularmechanismofsubstrateselectivityofthearginineagmatineantiporteradic AT prevostmartine molecularmechanismofsubstrateselectivityofthearginineagmatineantiporteradic |