Cargando…

Confidence is higher in touch than in vision in cases of perceptual ambiguity

The inclination to touch objects that we can see is a surprising behaviour, given that vision often supplies relevant and sufficiently accurate sensory evidence. Here we suggest that this ‘fact-checking’ phenomenon could be explained if touch provides a higher level of perceptual certainty than visi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fairhurst, Merle T., Travers, Eoin, Hayward, Vincent, Deroy, Ophelia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6199278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30353061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34052-z
_version_ 1783365109974827008
author Fairhurst, Merle T.
Travers, Eoin
Hayward, Vincent
Deroy, Ophelia
author_facet Fairhurst, Merle T.
Travers, Eoin
Hayward, Vincent
Deroy, Ophelia
author_sort Fairhurst, Merle T.
collection PubMed
description The inclination to touch objects that we can see is a surprising behaviour, given that vision often supplies relevant and sufficiently accurate sensory evidence. Here we suggest that this ‘fact-checking’ phenomenon could be explained if touch provides a higher level of perceptual certainty than vision. Testing this hypothesis, observers explored inverted T-shaped stimuli eliciting the Vertical-horizontal illusion in vision and touch, which included clear-cut and ambiguous cases. In separate blocks, observers judged whether the vertical bar was shorter or longer than the horizontal bar and rated the confidence in their judgments. Decisions reached by vision were objectively more accurate than those reached by touch with higher overall confidence ratings. However, while confidence was higher for vision rather than for touch in clear-cut cases, observers were more confident in touch when the stimuli were ambiguous. This relative bias as a function of ambiguity qualifies the view that confidence tracks objective accuracy and uses a comparable mapping across sensory modalities. Employing a perceptual illusion, our method disentangles objective and subjective accuracy showing how the latter is tracked by confidence and point towards possible origins for ‘fact checking’ by touch.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6199278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61992782018-10-25 Confidence is higher in touch than in vision in cases of perceptual ambiguity Fairhurst, Merle T. Travers, Eoin Hayward, Vincent Deroy, Ophelia Sci Rep Article The inclination to touch objects that we can see is a surprising behaviour, given that vision often supplies relevant and sufficiently accurate sensory evidence. Here we suggest that this ‘fact-checking’ phenomenon could be explained if touch provides a higher level of perceptual certainty than vision. Testing this hypothesis, observers explored inverted T-shaped stimuli eliciting the Vertical-horizontal illusion in vision and touch, which included clear-cut and ambiguous cases. In separate blocks, observers judged whether the vertical bar was shorter or longer than the horizontal bar and rated the confidence in their judgments. Decisions reached by vision were objectively more accurate than those reached by touch with higher overall confidence ratings. However, while confidence was higher for vision rather than for touch in clear-cut cases, observers were more confident in touch when the stimuli were ambiguous. This relative bias as a function of ambiguity qualifies the view that confidence tracks objective accuracy and uses a comparable mapping across sensory modalities. Employing a perceptual illusion, our method disentangles objective and subjective accuracy showing how the latter is tracked by confidence and point towards possible origins for ‘fact checking’ by touch. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6199278/ /pubmed/30353061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34052-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Fairhurst, Merle T.
Travers, Eoin
Hayward, Vincent
Deroy, Ophelia
Confidence is higher in touch than in vision in cases of perceptual ambiguity
title Confidence is higher in touch than in vision in cases of perceptual ambiguity
title_full Confidence is higher in touch than in vision in cases of perceptual ambiguity
title_fullStr Confidence is higher in touch than in vision in cases of perceptual ambiguity
title_full_unstemmed Confidence is higher in touch than in vision in cases of perceptual ambiguity
title_short Confidence is higher in touch than in vision in cases of perceptual ambiguity
title_sort confidence is higher in touch than in vision in cases of perceptual ambiguity
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6199278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30353061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34052-z
work_keys_str_mv AT fairhurstmerlet confidenceishigherintouchthaninvisionincasesofperceptualambiguity
AT traverseoin confidenceishigherintouchthaninvisionincasesofperceptualambiguity
AT haywardvincent confidenceishigherintouchthaninvisionincasesofperceptualambiguity
AT deroyophelia confidenceishigherintouchthaninvisionincasesofperceptualambiguity