Cargando…
Improving pilot project application and review processes: A novel application of lean six sigma in translational science
Each year our Clinical and Translational Science Award pilot projects program awards approximately $500,000 in translational pilot funding to advance health in South Texas. We identified needs to improve the timeliness, transparency, and efficiency of the review process by surveying applicants. Lean...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6199542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30370065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.30 |
_version_ | 1783365166978564096 |
---|---|
author | Schmidt, Susanne Shay, Laura Aubree Saygin, Can Wan, Hung-da Schulz, Karen Clark, Robert A. Shireman, Paula K. |
author_facet | Schmidt, Susanne Shay, Laura Aubree Saygin, Can Wan, Hung-da Schulz, Karen Clark, Robert A. Shireman, Paula K. |
author_sort | Schmidt, Susanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | Each year our Clinical and Translational Science Award pilot projects program awards approximately $500,000 in translational pilot funding to advance health in South Texas. We identified needs to improve the timeliness, transparency, and efficiency of the review process by surveying applicants. Lean six sigma methodologies, following a “Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control” approach, were used to streamline the pilot project application and review by identifying and removing bottlenecks from process flows. We evaluated the impact of our reorganized review process by surveying applicants and reviewers. Process mapping identified pilot project review as the main source of delay, leading to the implementation of a study section-style review mechanism. After one cycle, 90.3% of pilot applicants and 100% of reviewers were highly satisfied with the new processes and time to award notice was reduced by 2 months. All reviewers familiar with both review processes preferred the study section. We demonstrated how lean six sigma, a methodology not commonly applied in research administration, can be used to evaluate processes in translational science in academic health centers. Through our efforts, we were able to improve timeliness, transparency, and efficiency of the review process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6199542 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61995422018-10-25 Improving pilot project application and review processes: A novel application of lean six sigma in translational science Schmidt, Susanne Shay, Laura Aubree Saygin, Can Wan, Hung-da Schulz, Karen Clark, Robert A. Shireman, Paula K. J Clin Transl Sci Implementation, Policy and Community Engagement Each year our Clinical and Translational Science Award pilot projects program awards approximately $500,000 in translational pilot funding to advance health in South Texas. We identified needs to improve the timeliness, transparency, and efficiency of the review process by surveying applicants. Lean six sigma methodologies, following a “Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control” approach, were used to streamline the pilot project application and review by identifying and removing bottlenecks from process flows. We evaluated the impact of our reorganized review process by surveying applicants and reviewers. Process mapping identified pilot project review as the main source of delay, leading to the implementation of a study section-style review mechanism. After one cycle, 90.3% of pilot applicants and 100% of reviewers were highly satisfied with the new processes and time to award notice was reduced by 2 months. All reviewers familiar with both review processes preferred the study section. We demonstrated how lean six sigma, a methodology not commonly applied in research administration, can be used to evaluate processes in translational science in academic health centers. Through our efforts, we were able to improve timeliness, transparency, and efficiency of the review process. Cambridge University Press 2018-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6199542/ /pubmed/30370065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.30 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use. |
spellingShingle | Implementation, Policy and Community Engagement Schmidt, Susanne Shay, Laura Aubree Saygin, Can Wan, Hung-da Schulz, Karen Clark, Robert A. Shireman, Paula K. Improving pilot project application and review processes: A novel application of lean six sigma in translational science |
title | Improving pilot project application and review processes: A novel application of lean six sigma in translational science |
title_full | Improving pilot project application and review processes: A novel application of lean six sigma in translational science |
title_fullStr | Improving pilot project application and review processes: A novel application of lean six sigma in translational science |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving pilot project application and review processes: A novel application of lean six sigma in translational science |
title_short | Improving pilot project application and review processes: A novel application of lean six sigma in translational science |
title_sort | improving pilot project application and review processes: a novel application of lean six sigma in translational science |
topic | Implementation, Policy and Community Engagement |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6199542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30370065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.30 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schmidtsusanne improvingpilotprojectapplicationandreviewprocessesanovelapplicationofleansixsigmaintranslationalscience AT shaylauraaubree improvingpilotprojectapplicationandreviewprocessesanovelapplicationofleansixsigmaintranslationalscience AT saygincan improvingpilotprojectapplicationandreviewprocessesanovelapplicationofleansixsigmaintranslationalscience AT wanhungda improvingpilotprojectapplicationandreviewprocessesanovelapplicationofleansixsigmaintranslationalscience AT schulzkaren improvingpilotprojectapplicationandreviewprocessesanovelapplicationofleansixsigmaintranslationalscience AT clarkroberta improvingpilotprojectapplicationandreviewprocessesanovelapplicationofleansixsigmaintranslationalscience AT shiremanpaulak improvingpilotprojectapplicationandreviewprocessesanovelapplicationofleansixsigmaintranslationalscience |