Cargando…

Efficacy and effectiveness of Ceftaroline Fosamil in patients with pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is a relevant clinical and public health issue worldwide frequently associated with infections caused by Multi-Drug Resistant (MDR) pathogens. Ceftaroline fosamil is a promising new antibiotics with broad-spectrum bacterial activity. The aim of this systematic review and meta-a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sotgiu, Giovanni, Aliberti, Stefano, Gramegna, Andrea, Mantero, Marco, Di Pasquale, Marta, Trogu, Federica, Saderi, Laura, Blasi, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6199731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30352588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-018-0905-x
_version_ 1783365187175186432
author Sotgiu, Giovanni
Aliberti, Stefano
Gramegna, Andrea
Mantero, Marco
Di Pasquale, Marta
Trogu, Federica
Saderi, Laura
Blasi, Francesco
author_facet Sotgiu, Giovanni
Aliberti, Stefano
Gramegna, Andrea
Mantero, Marco
Di Pasquale, Marta
Trogu, Federica
Saderi, Laura
Blasi, Francesco
author_sort Sotgiu, Giovanni
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is a relevant clinical and public health issue worldwide frequently associated with infections caused by Multi-Drug Resistant (MDR) pathogens. Ceftaroline fosamil is a promising new antibiotics with broad-spectrum bacterial activity. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy and the effectiveness of ceftaroline fosamil in community-acquired (CAP), hospital-acquired (HAP), healthcare-associated (HCAP) and ventilator-associated (VAP) pneumonia. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out retrieving both experimental and observational studies. RESULTS: A total of 2364 records was found and 14 manuscripts were finally considered eligible. The pooled efficacy/effectiveness was 81.2% (I(2): 1.2%) in all types of pneumonia. The pooled relative risk of clinical cure was 1.1 (I(2): 0.0%). The success rate was higher than 70% for infections caused by S. pneumoniae and S. aureus, including MDR pathogens. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftaroline fosamil showed a high efficacy/effectiveness in patients with any type of pneumonia with a good safety profile. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-018-0905-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6199731
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61997312018-10-31 Efficacy and effectiveness of Ceftaroline Fosamil in patients with pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis Sotgiu, Giovanni Aliberti, Stefano Gramegna, Andrea Mantero, Marco Di Pasquale, Marta Trogu, Federica Saderi, Laura Blasi, Francesco Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is a relevant clinical and public health issue worldwide frequently associated with infections caused by Multi-Drug Resistant (MDR) pathogens. Ceftaroline fosamil is a promising new antibiotics with broad-spectrum bacterial activity. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy and the effectiveness of ceftaroline fosamil in community-acquired (CAP), hospital-acquired (HAP), healthcare-associated (HCAP) and ventilator-associated (VAP) pneumonia. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out retrieving both experimental and observational studies. RESULTS: A total of 2364 records was found and 14 manuscripts were finally considered eligible. The pooled efficacy/effectiveness was 81.2% (I(2): 1.2%) in all types of pneumonia. The pooled relative risk of clinical cure was 1.1 (I(2): 0.0%). The success rate was higher than 70% for infections caused by S. pneumoniae and S. aureus, including MDR pathogens. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftaroline fosamil showed a high efficacy/effectiveness in patients with any type of pneumonia with a good safety profile. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-018-0905-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-23 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6199731/ /pubmed/30352588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-018-0905-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Sotgiu, Giovanni
Aliberti, Stefano
Gramegna, Andrea
Mantero, Marco
Di Pasquale, Marta
Trogu, Federica
Saderi, Laura
Blasi, Francesco
Efficacy and effectiveness of Ceftaroline Fosamil in patients with pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Efficacy and effectiveness of Ceftaroline Fosamil in patients with pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and effectiveness of Ceftaroline Fosamil in patients with pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and effectiveness of Ceftaroline Fosamil in patients with pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and effectiveness of Ceftaroline Fosamil in patients with pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and effectiveness of Ceftaroline Fosamil in patients with pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and effectiveness of ceftaroline fosamil in patients with pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6199731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30352588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-018-0905-x
work_keys_str_mv AT sotgiugiovanni efficacyandeffectivenessofceftarolinefosamilinpatientswithpneumoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alibertistefano efficacyandeffectivenessofceftarolinefosamilinpatientswithpneumoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gramegnaandrea efficacyandeffectivenessofceftarolinefosamilinpatientswithpneumoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT manteromarco efficacyandeffectivenessofceftarolinefosamilinpatientswithpneumoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dipasqualemarta efficacyandeffectivenessofceftarolinefosamilinpatientswithpneumoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT trogufederica efficacyandeffectivenessofceftarolinefosamilinpatientswithpneumoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT saderilaura efficacyandeffectivenessofceftarolinefosamilinpatientswithpneumoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT blasifrancesco efficacyandeffectivenessofceftarolinefosamilinpatientswithpneumoniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis