Cargando…

Effectiveness of automated and live phone reminders after mailed-FIT outreach in a pilot randomized trial

The effectiveness of annual mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) outreach is highest when return rates are optimized, which is aided by patient reminders. In a pilot patient-randomized controlled trial in two western Washington clinics of the Sea Mar Community Health Centers, we compared the ef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nielson, Carrie M., Rivelli, Jennifer S., Fuoco, Morgan J., Gawlik, Victoria R., Jimenez, Ricardo, Petrik, Amanda F., Coronado, Gloria D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6199768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30364785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.012
_version_ 1783365196225445888
author Nielson, Carrie M.
Rivelli, Jennifer S.
Fuoco, Morgan J.
Gawlik, Victoria R.
Jimenez, Ricardo
Petrik, Amanda F.
Coronado, Gloria D.
author_facet Nielson, Carrie M.
Rivelli, Jennifer S.
Fuoco, Morgan J.
Gawlik, Victoria R.
Jimenez, Ricardo
Petrik, Amanda F.
Coronado, Gloria D.
author_sort Nielson, Carrie M.
collection PubMed
description The effectiveness of annual mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) outreach is highest when return rates are optimized, which is aided by patient reminders. In a pilot patient-randomized controlled trial in two western Washington clinics of the Sea Mar Community Health Centers, we compared the effectiveness of two phone-based approaches to mailed FIT outreach reminders. In fall 2016, patients ages 50–75, due for colorectal cancer screening, and with a visit in the previous year at either of two clinics, were mailed an introductory letter and FIT. Those who did not return the FIT within 3 weeks (N = 427) were randomized to receive either: a) a series of up to 6 automated phone reminders; or b) the combination of automated and live phone reminders (up to 6 in total). The sole outcome was FIT return within 6 months after the FIT mailing. FIT completion rates were similar in the groups assigned to receive automated calls vs automated plus live calls (40% vs 39%; p = 0.89). The effectiveness of FIT reminder mode differed by language preference (p for interaction = 0.03): among Spanish-preferring patients (n = 106), FIT return rates were higher in the automated-only group than to the auto- plus live-call group (62% vs 39%, p = 0.02). Among English-preferring patients, no difference in modes was observed (n = 279, 32% vs 34%, p = 0.74). We observed no added benefit of live reminder calls in a mailed FIT plus automated call reminder program; our findings may inform efforts to efficiently optimize mailed-FIT outreach programs. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01742065
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6199768
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61997682018-10-25 Effectiveness of automated and live phone reminders after mailed-FIT outreach in a pilot randomized trial Nielson, Carrie M. Rivelli, Jennifer S. Fuoco, Morgan J. Gawlik, Victoria R. Jimenez, Ricardo Petrik, Amanda F. Coronado, Gloria D. Prev Med Rep Short Communication The effectiveness of annual mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) outreach is highest when return rates are optimized, which is aided by patient reminders. In a pilot patient-randomized controlled trial in two western Washington clinics of the Sea Mar Community Health Centers, we compared the effectiveness of two phone-based approaches to mailed FIT outreach reminders. In fall 2016, patients ages 50–75, due for colorectal cancer screening, and with a visit in the previous year at either of two clinics, were mailed an introductory letter and FIT. Those who did not return the FIT within 3 weeks (N = 427) were randomized to receive either: a) a series of up to 6 automated phone reminders; or b) the combination of automated and live phone reminders (up to 6 in total). The sole outcome was FIT return within 6 months after the FIT mailing. FIT completion rates were similar in the groups assigned to receive automated calls vs automated plus live calls (40% vs 39%; p = 0.89). The effectiveness of FIT reminder mode differed by language preference (p for interaction = 0.03): among Spanish-preferring patients (n = 106), FIT return rates were higher in the automated-only group than to the auto- plus live-call group (62% vs 39%, p = 0.02). Among English-preferring patients, no difference in modes was observed (n = 279, 32% vs 34%, p = 0.74). We observed no added benefit of live reminder calls in a mailed FIT plus automated call reminder program; our findings may inform efforts to efficiently optimize mailed-FIT outreach programs. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01742065 Elsevier 2018-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6199768/ /pubmed/30364785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.012 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Short Communication
Nielson, Carrie M.
Rivelli, Jennifer S.
Fuoco, Morgan J.
Gawlik, Victoria R.
Jimenez, Ricardo
Petrik, Amanda F.
Coronado, Gloria D.
Effectiveness of automated and live phone reminders after mailed-FIT outreach in a pilot randomized trial
title Effectiveness of automated and live phone reminders after mailed-FIT outreach in a pilot randomized trial
title_full Effectiveness of automated and live phone reminders after mailed-FIT outreach in a pilot randomized trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of automated and live phone reminders after mailed-FIT outreach in a pilot randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of automated and live phone reminders after mailed-FIT outreach in a pilot randomized trial
title_short Effectiveness of automated and live phone reminders after mailed-FIT outreach in a pilot randomized trial
title_sort effectiveness of automated and live phone reminders after mailed-fit outreach in a pilot randomized trial
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6199768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30364785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.012
work_keys_str_mv AT nielsoncarriem effectivenessofautomatedandlivephoneremindersaftermailedfitoutreachinapilotrandomizedtrial
AT rivellijennifers effectivenessofautomatedandlivephoneremindersaftermailedfitoutreachinapilotrandomizedtrial
AT fuocomorganj effectivenessofautomatedandlivephoneremindersaftermailedfitoutreachinapilotrandomizedtrial
AT gawlikvictoriar effectivenessofautomatedandlivephoneremindersaftermailedfitoutreachinapilotrandomizedtrial
AT jimenezricardo effectivenessofautomatedandlivephoneremindersaftermailedfitoutreachinapilotrandomizedtrial
AT petrikamandaf effectivenessofautomatedandlivephoneremindersaftermailedfitoutreachinapilotrandomizedtrial
AT coronadogloriad effectivenessofautomatedandlivephoneremindersaftermailedfitoutreachinapilotrandomizedtrial