Cargando…

Antifungal Susceptibility and Biofilm Production of Candida spp. Isolated from Clinical Samples

OBJECTIVE: The study aims to speciate clinical Candida isolates and detect their biofilm-forming ability and antifungal resistance. METHODS: All the Candida spp. isolated from different clinical samples like pus, urine, blood, and body fluid were included in the study. Biofilm production was tested...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marak, Munmun B., Dhanashree, Biranthabail
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6199855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30405717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/7495218
_version_ 1783365217781022720
author Marak, Munmun B.
Dhanashree, Biranthabail
author_facet Marak, Munmun B.
Dhanashree, Biranthabail
author_sort Marak, Munmun B.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The study aims to speciate clinical Candida isolates and detect their biofilm-forming ability and antifungal resistance. METHODS: All the Candida spp. isolated from different clinical samples like pus, urine, blood, and body fluid were included in the study. Biofilm production was tested by the microtiter plate method. Antifungal susceptibility was studied by the disk diffusion method. Patient's demographic details such as age, sex, and clinical information were collected. Presence of other risk factors such as diabetes mellitus, history of antibiotic use, and any urinary tract instrumentations was also recorded. RESULTS: Among 90 Candida species isolated, most predominant species was found to be C. albicans (45.5%) followed by C. tropicalis (28.88%), C. krusei (20%), C. glabrata (3.33%), and C. parapsilosis (2.22%). Candida spp. were isolated from urine (43%), BAL/sputum (18.88%), high vaginal swab (8.88%), suction tips (7.77%), blood and wound swabs (6.66%), pus (3.33%), bile aspirate (2.22%), and deep tissue (1.11%). A larger number of females were affected than males, and the age group of 51 to 60 years was more susceptible to candidiasis. A higher number of C. albicans isolates produced biofilm followed by C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, and C. krusei. However, C. glabrata showed no biofilm production in our study. All Candida isolates were 100% sensitive to amphotericin B. Voriconazole was the next effective drug with 81.11% susceptibility. 24.44% of strains were resistant to fluconazole. CONCLUSION: Speciation of Candida isolates, detection of ability to form the biofilm, and monitoring of antifungal susceptibility testing are necessary for appropriate treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6199855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61998552018-11-07 Antifungal Susceptibility and Biofilm Production of Candida spp. Isolated from Clinical Samples Marak, Munmun B. Dhanashree, Biranthabail Int J Microbiol Research Article OBJECTIVE: The study aims to speciate clinical Candida isolates and detect their biofilm-forming ability and antifungal resistance. METHODS: All the Candida spp. isolated from different clinical samples like pus, urine, blood, and body fluid were included in the study. Biofilm production was tested by the microtiter plate method. Antifungal susceptibility was studied by the disk diffusion method. Patient's demographic details such as age, sex, and clinical information were collected. Presence of other risk factors such as diabetes mellitus, history of antibiotic use, and any urinary tract instrumentations was also recorded. RESULTS: Among 90 Candida species isolated, most predominant species was found to be C. albicans (45.5%) followed by C. tropicalis (28.88%), C. krusei (20%), C. glabrata (3.33%), and C. parapsilosis (2.22%). Candida spp. were isolated from urine (43%), BAL/sputum (18.88%), high vaginal swab (8.88%), suction tips (7.77%), blood and wound swabs (6.66%), pus (3.33%), bile aspirate (2.22%), and deep tissue (1.11%). A larger number of females were affected than males, and the age group of 51 to 60 years was more susceptible to candidiasis. A higher number of C. albicans isolates produced biofilm followed by C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, and C. krusei. However, C. glabrata showed no biofilm production in our study. All Candida isolates were 100% sensitive to amphotericin B. Voriconazole was the next effective drug with 81.11% susceptibility. 24.44% of strains were resistant to fluconazole. CONCLUSION: Speciation of Candida isolates, detection of ability to form the biofilm, and monitoring of antifungal susceptibility testing are necessary for appropriate treatment. Hindawi 2018-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6199855/ /pubmed/30405717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/7495218 Text en Copyright © 2018 Munmun B. Marak and Biranthabail Dhanashree. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Marak, Munmun B.
Dhanashree, Biranthabail
Antifungal Susceptibility and Biofilm Production of Candida spp. Isolated from Clinical Samples
title Antifungal Susceptibility and Biofilm Production of Candida spp. Isolated from Clinical Samples
title_full Antifungal Susceptibility and Biofilm Production of Candida spp. Isolated from Clinical Samples
title_fullStr Antifungal Susceptibility and Biofilm Production of Candida spp. Isolated from Clinical Samples
title_full_unstemmed Antifungal Susceptibility and Biofilm Production of Candida spp. Isolated from Clinical Samples
title_short Antifungal Susceptibility and Biofilm Production of Candida spp. Isolated from Clinical Samples
title_sort antifungal susceptibility and biofilm production of candida spp. isolated from clinical samples
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6199855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30405717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/7495218
work_keys_str_mv AT marakmunmunb antifungalsusceptibilityandbiofilmproductionofcandidasppisolatedfromclinicalsamples
AT dhanashreebiranthabail antifungalsusceptibilityandbiofilmproductionofcandidasppisolatedfromclinicalsamples