Cargando…

Spatial Integration of Somatosensory Inputs during Sensory-Motor Plasticity Phenomena Is Normal in Focal Hand Dystonia

BACKGROUND: Surround inhibition is a system that sharpens sensation by creating an inhibitory zone around the central core of activation. In the motor system, this mechanism probably contributes to the selection of voluntary movements, and it seems to be lost in dystonia. Objectives. To explore if s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Terranova, C., Rizzo, V., Morgante, F., Maggio, R., Calamuneri, A., Chillemi, G., Girlanda, P., Quartarone, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6199881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30405710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4135708
_version_ 1783365224076673024
author Terranova, C.
Rizzo, V.
Morgante, F.
Maggio, R.
Calamuneri, A.
Chillemi, G.
Girlanda, P.
Quartarone, A.
author_facet Terranova, C.
Rizzo, V.
Morgante, F.
Maggio, R.
Calamuneri, A.
Chillemi, G.
Girlanda, P.
Quartarone, A.
author_sort Terranova, C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surround inhibition is a system that sharpens sensation by creating an inhibitory zone around the central core of activation. In the motor system, this mechanism probably contributes to the selection of voluntary movements, and it seems to be lost in dystonia. Objectives. To explore if sensory information is abnormally processed and integrated in focal hand dystonia (FHD) and if surround inhibition phenomena are operating during sensory-motor plasticity and somatosensory integration in normal humans and in patients with FHD. Methods. We looked at the MEP facilitation obtained after 5 Hz repetitive paired associative stimulation of median (PAS M), ulnar (PAS U), and median + ulnar nerve (PAS MU) stimulation in 8 normal subjects and 8 FHD. We evaluated the ratio MU/(M + U) ∗ 100 and the spatial and temporal somatosensory integration recording the somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) evoked by a dual nerve input. RESULTS: FHD had two main abnormalities: first, the amount of facilitation was larger than normal subjects; second, the spatial specificity was lost. The MU/(M + U) ∗ 100 ratio was similar in healthy subjects and in FHD patients, and the somatosensory integration was normal in this subset of patients. Conclusions. The inhibitory integration of somatosensory inputs and the somatosensory inhibition are normal in patients with focal dystonia as well as lateral surrounding inhibition phenomena during sensory-motor plasticity in FHD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6199881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61998812018-11-07 Spatial Integration of Somatosensory Inputs during Sensory-Motor Plasticity Phenomena Is Normal in Focal Hand Dystonia Terranova, C. Rizzo, V. Morgante, F. Maggio, R. Calamuneri, A. Chillemi, G. Girlanda, P. Quartarone, A. Neural Plast Research Article BACKGROUND: Surround inhibition is a system that sharpens sensation by creating an inhibitory zone around the central core of activation. In the motor system, this mechanism probably contributes to the selection of voluntary movements, and it seems to be lost in dystonia. Objectives. To explore if sensory information is abnormally processed and integrated in focal hand dystonia (FHD) and if surround inhibition phenomena are operating during sensory-motor plasticity and somatosensory integration in normal humans and in patients with FHD. Methods. We looked at the MEP facilitation obtained after 5 Hz repetitive paired associative stimulation of median (PAS M), ulnar (PAS U), and median + ulnar nerve (PAS MU) stimulation in 8 normal subjects and 8 FHD. We evaluated the ratio MU/(M + U) ∗ 100 and the spatial and temporal somatosensory integration recording the somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) evoked by a dual nerve input. RESULTS: FHD had two main abnormalities: first, the amount of facilitation was larger than normal subjects; second, the spatial specificity was lost. The MU/(M + U) ∗ 100 ratio was similar in healthy subjects and in FHD patients, and the somatosensory integration was normal in this subset of patients. Conclusions. The inhibitory integration of somatosensory inputs and the somatosensory inhibition are normal in patients with focal dystonia as well as lateral surrounding inhibition phenomena during sensory-motor plasticity in FHD. Hindawi 2018-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6199881/ /pubmed/30405710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4135708 Text en Copyright © 2018 C. Terranova et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Terranova, C.
Rizzo, V.
Morgante, F.
Maggio, R.
Calamuneri, A.
Chillemi, G.
Girlanda, P.
Quartarone, A.
Spatial Integration of Somatosensory Inputs during Sensory-Motor Plasticity Phenomena Is Normal in Focal Hand Dystonia
title Spatial Integration of Somatosensory Inputs during Sensory-Motor Plasticity Phenomena Is Normal in Focal Hand Dystonia
title_full Spatial Integration of Somatosensory Inputs during Sensory-Motor Plasticity Phenomena Is Normal in Focal Hand Dystonia
title_fullStr Spatial Integration of Somatosensory Inputs during Sensory-Motor Plasticity Phenomena Is Normal in Focal Hand Dystonia
title_full_unstemmed Spatial Integration of Somatosensory Inputs during Sensory-Motor Plasticity Phenomena Is Normal in Focal Hand Dystonia
title_short Spatial Integration of Somatosensory Inputs during Sensory-Motor Plasticity Phenomena Is Normal in Focal Hand Dystonia
title_sort spatial integration of somatosensory inputs during sensory-motor plasticity phenomena is normal in focal hand dystonia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6199881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30405710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4135708
work_keys_str_mv AT terranovac spatialintegrationofsomatosensoryinputsduringsensorymotorplasticityphenomenaisnormalinfocalhanddystonia
AT rizzov spatialintegrationofsomatosensoryinputsduringsensorymotorplasticityphenomenaisnormalinfocalhanddystonia
AT morgantef spatialintegrationofsomatosensoryinputsduringsensorymotorplasticityphenomenaisnormalinfocalhanddystonia
AT maggior spatialintegrationofsomatosensoryinputsduringsensorymotorplasticityphenomenaisnormalinfocalhanddystonia
AT calamuneria spatialintegrationofsomatosensoryinputsduringsensorymotorplasticityphenomenaisnormalinfocalhanddystonia
AT chillemig spatialintegrationofsomatosensoryinputsduringsensorymotorplasticityphenomenaisnormalinfocalhanddystonia
AT girlandap spatialintegrationofsomatosensoryinputsduringsensorymotorplasticityphenomenaisnormalinfocalhanddystonia
AT quartaronea spatialintegrationofsomatosensoryinputsduringsensorymotorplasticityphenomenaisnormalinfocalhanddystonia