Cargando…
Health care quality from the patients’ perspective: a comparative study between an old and a new, high-tech hospital
PURPOSE: Previous studies show that the hospital environment and the behavior of health care personnel may predict patients’ perceptions of care quality. The aim of the study was to explore changes in perceived care quality from the patients’ perspective (QPP) when hospital services are relocated fr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6200069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30410346 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S176630 |
_version_ | 1783365266755813376 |
---|---|
author | Grøndahl, Vigdis Abrahamsen Kirchhoff, Jörg W Andersen, Kirsti Lauvli Sørby, Lise Aagaard Andreassen, Hilde Marie Skaug, Eli-Anne Roos, Anne Karine Tvete, Liv Solveig Helgesen, Ann Karin |
author_facet | Grøndahl, Vigdis Abrahamsen Kirchhoff, Jörg W Andersen, Kirsti Lauvli Sørby, Lise Aagaard Andreassen, Hilde Marie Skaug, Eli-Anne Roos, Anne Karine Tvete, Liv Solveig Helgesen, Ann Karin |
author_sort | Grøndahl, Vigdis Abrahamsen |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Previous studies show that the hospital environment and the behavior of health care personnel may predict patients’ perceptions of care quality. The aim of the study was to explore changes in perceived care quality from the patients’ perspective (QPP) when hospital services are relocated from an old to a new high-tech hospital and to describe what is important for patients in the high-tech hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A comparative cross-sectional design was used. The questionnaire QPP, which is based on a theoretical model of the quality of care comprising four quality dimensions, was used. Data were collected in 2015 (old hospital) and 2016 (new hospital), with 253 and 324 respondents, respectively, by consecutive sampling. Comparative statistics was used to test differences between patients’ care quality perceptions (perceived reality [PR] and subjective importance [SI]) (P≤0.05). RESULTS: The patients rated PR of all four quality dimensions (the care organization’s physical-technical conditions and sociocultural approach and the caregivers’ medical-technical competence and identity-oriented approach) higher in the new hospital. However, only the two quality dimensions concerning the care organization were rated significantly more highly. On an item level, five of the 27 items scored significantly higher on patients’ SI than on patients’ PR of the care in the new hospital, indicating a quality deficiency from the patients’ perspective. This comprised receiving effective pain relief, receiving examination and treatment within an acceptable waiting time, receiving useful information on self-care, receiving useful information on which doctors were responsible for their medical care, and having a comfortable bed. CONCLUSION: The increase in care QPP was associated with improved environmental conditions, and no significant improvement in care quality was associated with the health care personnel. The results indicate that being in a high-tech environment does not improve patients’ perceptions of care quality provided by health care personnel. The results gave valuable information for quality improvement in clinical practice, based on the patients’ perspective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6200069 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62000692018-11-08 Health care quality from the patients’ perspective: a comparative study between an old and a new, high-tech hospital Grøndahl, Vigdis Abrahamsen Kirchhoff, Jörg W Andersen, Kirsti Lauvli Sørby, Lise Aagaard Andreassen, Hilde Marie Skaug, Eli-Anne Roos, Anne Karine Tvete, Liv Solveig Helgesen, Ann Karin J Multidiscip Healthc Original Research PURPOSE: Previous studies show that the hospital environment and the behavior of health care personnel may predict patients’ perceptions of care quality. The aim of the study was to explore changes in perceived care quality from the patients’ perspective (QPP) when hospital services are relocated from an old to a new high-tech hospital and to describe what is important for patients in the high-tech hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A comparative cross-sectional design was used. The questionnaire QPP, which is based on a theoretical model of the quality of care comprising four quality dimensions, was used. Data were collected in 2015 (old hospital) and 2016 (new hospital), with 253 and 324 respondents, respectively, by consecutive sampling. Comparative statistics was used to test differences between patients’ care quality perceptions (perceived reality [PR] and subjective importance [SI]) (P≤0.05). RESULTS: The patients rated PR of all four quality dimensions (the care organization’s physical-technical conditions and sociocultural approach and the caregivers’ medical-technical competence and identity-oriented approach) higher in the new hospital. However, only the two quality dimensions concerning the care organization were rated significantly more highly. On an item level, five of the 27 items scored significantly higher on patients’ SI than on patients’ PR of the care in the new hospital, indicating a quality deficiency from the patients’ perspective. This comprised receiving effective pain relief, receiving examination and treatment within an acceptable waiting time, receiving useful information on self-care, receiving useful information on which doctors were responsible for their medical care, and having a comfortable bed. CONCLUSION: The increase in care QPP was associated with improved environmental conditions, and no significant improvement in care quality was associated with the health care personnel. The results indicate that being in a high-tech environment does not improve patients’ perceptions of care quality provided by health care personnel. The results gave valuable information for quality improvement in clinical practice, based on the patients’ perspective. Dove Medical Press 2018-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6200069/ /pubmed/30410346 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S176630 Text en © 2018 Grøndahl et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Grøndahl, Vigdis Abrahamsen Kirchhoff, Jörg W Andersen, Kirsti Lauvli Sørby, Lise Aagaard Andreassen, Hilde Marie Skaug, Eli-Anne Roos, Anne Karine Tvete, Liv Solveig Helgesen, Ann Karin Health care quality from the patients’ perspective: a comparative study between an old and a new, high-tech hospital |
title | Health care quality from the patients’ perspective: a comparative study between an old and a new, high-tech hospital |
title_full | Health care quality from the patients’ perspective: a comparative study between an old and a new, high-tech hospital |
title_fullStr | Health care quality from the patients’ perspective: a comparative study between an old and a new, high-tech hospital |
title_full_unstemmed | Health care quality from the patients’ perspective: a comparative study between an old and a new, high-tech hospital |
title_short | Health care quality from the patients’ perspective: a comparative study between an old and a new, high-tech hospital |
title_sort | health care quality from the patients’ perspective: a comparative study between an old and a new, high-tech hospital |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6200069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30410346 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S176630 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grøndahlvigdisabrahamsen healthcarequalityfromthepatientsperspectiveacomparativestudybetweenanoldandanewhightechhospital AT kirchhoffjorgw healthcarequalityfromthepatientsperspectiveacomparativestudybetweenanoldandanewhightechhospital AT andersenkirstilauvli healthcarequalityfromthepatientsperspectiveacomparativestudybetweenanoldandanewhightechhospital AT sørbyliseaagaard healthcarequalityfromthepatientsperspectiveacomparativestudybetweenanoldandanewhightechhospital AT andreassenhildemarie healthcarequalityfromthepatientsperspectiveacomparativestudybetweenanoldandanewhightechhospital AT skaugelianne healthcarequalityfromthepatientsperspectiveacomparativestudybetweenanoldandanewhightechhospital AT roosannekarine healthcarequalityfromthepatientsperspectiveacomparativestudybetweenanoldandanewhightechhospital AT tvetelivsolveig healthcarequalityfromthepatientsperspectiveacomparativestudybetweenanoldandanewhightechhospital AT helgesenannkarin healthcarequalityfromthepatientsperspectiveacomparativestudybetweenanoldandanewhightechhospital |