Cargando…

Impact of thoracic epidural sympathetic block on cardiac repolarization

PURPOSE: The interval from the peak to the end of the T wave (Tp-Te) on electrocardiography is considered a marker of ventricular arrhythmias. A previous study suggested that right stellate ganglion block prolonged QT and QT dispersion (QTD). We investigated the effect of thoracic epidural sympathet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Komatsuzaki, Makoto, Takasusuki, Toshifumi, Yamaguchi, Shigeki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6200079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30410391
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.SI82402
_version_ 1783365269124546560
author Komatsuzaki, Makoto
Takasusuki, Toshifumi
Yamaguchi, Shigeki
author_facet Komatsuzaki, Makoto
Takasusuki, Toshifumi
Yamaguchi, Shigeki
author_sort Komatsuzaki, Makoto
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The interval from the peak to the end of the T wave (Tp-Te) on electrocardiography is considered a marker of ventricular arrhythmias. A previous study suggested that right stellate ganglion block prolonged QT and QT dispersion (QTD). We investigated the effect of thoracic epidural sympathetic block with 1% mepivacaine on QT, QTD, Tp–Te, and Tp–Te/QT by using computerized measurement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After obtaining the approval of the ethics committee of Dokkyo Medical University Hospital, 23 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II who were scheduled to undergo thoracic surgery were enrolled. An epidural catheter was inserted at the Th4-5 or 5–6 level and then used for injection of 7 mL of 1% mepivacaine. Changes in RR interval, QT, corrected QT (QTc), QTD, QTc dispersion (QTcD), Tp-Te, Tp–Te/QT, and Tp–Te/QTc before and after epidural injection were assessed by computerized measurement. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: Systolic blood pressure was consistently suppressed 10–15 minutes after injection (baseline: 136±10 mmHg, 11 minutes: 113±12 mmHg, 12 minutes: 112±13 mmHg, 13 minutes: 112±12 mmHg, 14 minutes: 108±17 mmHg, 15 minutes: 111±14 mmHg; P<0.05). However, RR interval, QT, QTc, QTD, QTcD, Tp–Te, Tp–Te/QT, and Tp–Te/QTc were not changed after epidural block. CONCLUSION: Thoracic epidural injection of 1% mepivacaine did not alter QT, QTc, QTD, QTcD, Tp–Te, Tp–Te/QT, or Tp–Te/QTc. These results emphasize the safety of thoracic epidural sympathetic block with 1% mepivacaine for patients compared with right stellate ganglion block, in terms of cardiac repolarization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6200079
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62000792018-11-08 Impact of thoracic epidural sympathetic block on cardiac repolarization Komatsuzaki, Makoto Takasusuki, Toshifumi Yamaguchi, Shigeki Local Reg Anesth Original Research PURPOSE: The interval from the peak to the end of the T wave (Tp-Te) on electrocardiography is considered a marker of ventricular arrhythmias. A previous study suggested that right stellate ganglion block prolonged QT and QT dispersion (QTD). We investigated the effect of thoracic epidural sympathetic block with 1% mepivacaine on QT, QTD, Tp–Te, and Tp–Te/QT by using computerized measurement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After obtaining the approval of the ethics committee of Dokkyo Medical University Hospital, 23 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II who were scheduled to undergo thoracic surgery were enrolled. An epidural catheter was inserted at the Th4-5 or 5–6 level and then used for injection of 7 mL of 1% mepivacaine. Changes in RR interval, QT, corrected QT (QTc), QTD, QTc dispersion (QTcD), Tp-Te, Tp–Te/QT, and Tp–Te/QTc before and after epidural injection were assessed by computerized measurement. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: Systolic blood pressure was consistently suppressed 10–15 minutes after injection (baseline: 136±10 mmHg, 11 minutes: 113±12 mmHg, 12 minutes: 112±13 mmHg, 13 minutes: 112±12 mmHg, 14 minutes: 108±17 mmHg, 15 minutes: 111±14 mmHg; P<0.05). However, RR interval, QT, QTc, QTD, QTcD, Tp–Te, Tp–Te/QT, and Tp–Te/QTc were not changed after epidural block. CONCLUSION: Thoracic epidural injection of 1% mepivacaine did not alter QT, QTc, QTD, QTcD, Tp–Te, Tp–Te/QT, or Tp–Te/QTc. These results emphasize the safety of thoracic epidural sympathetic block with 1% mepivacaine for patients compared with right stellate ganglion block, in terms of cardiac repolarization. Dove Medical Press 2018-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6200079/ /pubmed/30410391 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.SI82402 Text en © 2018 Komatsuzaki et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Komatsuzaki, Makoto
Takasusuki, Toshifumi
Yamaguchi, Shigeki
Impact of thoracic epidural sympathetic block on cardiac repolarization
title Impact of thoracic epidural sympathetic block on cardiac repolarization
title_full Impact of thoracic epidural sympathetic block on cardiac repolarization
title_fullStr Impact of thoracic epidural sympathetic block on cardiac repolarization
title_full_unstemmed Impact of thoracic epidural sympathetic block on cardiac repolarization
title_short Impact of thoracic epidural sympathetic block on cardiac repolarization
title_sort impact of thoracic epidural sympathetic block on cardiac repolarization
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6200079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30410391
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.SI82402
work_keys_str_mv AT komatsuzakimakoto impactofthoracicepiduralsympatheticblockoncardiacrepolarization
AT takasusukitoshifumi impactofthoracicepiduralsympatheticblockoncardiacrepolarization
AT yamaguchishigeki impactofthoracicepiduralsympatheticblockoncardiacrepolarization