Cargando…

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of angiogenesis blockade for the treatment of gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION: To date, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody (mAb, bevacizumab), anti-VEGF receptor mAb (ramucirumab) and selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (sunitinib, sorafenib and apatinib) have been tested in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bai, Zhi-Gang, Zhang, Zhong-Tao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6200090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30410364
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S169484
_version_ 1783365272097259520
author Bai, Zhi-Gang
Zhang, Zhong-Tao
author_facet Bai, Zhi-Gang
Zhang, Zhong-Tao
author_sort Bai, Zhi-Gang
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To date, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody (mAb, bevacizumab), anti-VEGF receptor mAb (ramucirumab) and selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (sunitinib, sorafenib and apatinib) have been tested in the clinical trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the current study, results of 32 clinical trials (24 Phase I or II, 8 Phase III) were systematically reviewed and meta-analysis was performed in 8 Phase III trial results. RESULTS: It was found that median overall survival (OS) time and progression-free survival (PFS) time were significantly longer in the patients treated with antiangiogenic reagents compared to that in the patients with placebo when all of 8 Phase III clinical trials were analyzed together (OS: odds ratio = 0.805, 95% CI: 0.719–0.901, P < 0.001; PFS: odds ratio = 0.719, 95% CI: 0.533–969, P = 0.030). CONCLUSION: Meta-analysis on bevacizumab (4 out 8 Phase III trials) indicated that neither OS nor PFS was significantly different between the groups treated with bevacizumab or placebo with or without combination of other chemotherapeutic reagents (OS: odds ratio = 0.909, 95% CI: 0.780–1.059, P = 0.221; PFS: odds ratio = 0.985, 95% CI: 0.865–1.122, P = 0.826). By contrast, meta-analysis on ramucirumab (3 out of 8 Phase III trials) revealed that ramucirumab was significantly favored in the treatment of gastric cancer with significant different OS between the two groups (odds ratio = 0.720, 95% CI: 0.604–0.858, P < 0.001). In addition, patients treated with VEGF or VEGFR blockers had higher morbidity of hypertension and neutropenia, but lower risk of side effects of vomiting and anemia. These findings suggest that addition of antiangiogenesis reagents, especially anti-VEGFR-mAb, to the first- or second-line chemotherapy could prolong patient’s OS and PFS time in the advanced or metastatic gastric cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6200090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62000902018-11-08 A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of angiogenesis blockade for the treatment of gastric cancer Bai, Zhi-Gang Zhang, Zhong-Tao Onco Targets Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: To date, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody (mAb, bevacizumab), anti-VEGF receptor mAb (ramucirumab) and selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (sunitinib, sorafenib and apatinib) have been tested in the clinical trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the current study, results of 32 clinical trials (24 Phase I or II, 8 Phase III) were systematically reviewed and meta-analysis was performed in 8 Phase III trial results. RESULTS: It was found that median overall survival (OS) time and progression-free survival (PFS) time were significantly longer in the patients treated with antiangiogenic reagents compared to that in the patients with placebo when all of 8 Phase III clinical trials were analyzed together (OS: odds ratio = 0.805, 95% CI: 0.719–0.901, P < 0.001; PFS: odds ratio = 0.719, 95% CI: 0.533–969, P = 0.030). CONCLUSION: Meta-analysis on bevacizumab (4 out 8 Phase III trials) indicated that neither OS nor PFS was significantly different between the groups treated with bevacizumab or placebo with or without combination of other chemotherapeutic reagents (OS: odds ratio = 0.909, 95% CI: 0.780–1.059, P = 0.221; PFS: odds ratio = 0.985, 95% CI: 0.865–1.122, P = 0.826). By contrast, meta-analysis on ramucirumab (3 out of 8 Phase III trials) revealed that ramucirumab was significantly favored in the treatment of gastric cancer with significant different OS between the two groups (odds ratio = 0.720, 95% CI: 0.604–0.858, P < 0.001). In addition, patients treated with VEGF or VEGFR blockers had higher morbidity of hypertension and neutropenia, but lower risk of side effects of vomiting and anemia. These findings suggest that addition of antiangiogenesis reagents, especially anti-VEGFR-mAb, to the first- or second-line chemotherapy could prolong patient’s OS and PFS time in the advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. Dove Medical Press 2018-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6200090/ /pubmed/30410364 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S169484 Text en © 2018 Bai and Zhang, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Limited This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed
spellingShingle Original Research
Bai, Zhi-Gang
Zhang, Zhong-Tao
A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of angiogenesis blockade for the treatment of gastric cancer
title A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of angiogenesis blockade for the treatment of gastric cancer
title_full A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of angiogenesis blockade for the treatment of gastric cancer
title_fullStr A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of angiogenesis blockade for the treatment of gastric cancer
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of angiogenesis blockade for the treatment of gastric cancer
title_short A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of angiogenesis blockade for the treatment of gastric cancer
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of angiogenesis blockade for the treatment of gastric cancer
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6200090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30410364
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S169484
work_keys_str_mv AT baizhigang asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheeffectofangiogenesisblockadeforthetreatmentofgastriccancer
AT zhangzhongtao asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheeffectofangiogenesisblockadeforthetreatmentofgastriccancer
AT baizhigang systematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheeffectofangiogenesisblockadeforthetreatmentofgastriccancer
AT zhangzhongtao systematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheeffectofangiogenesisblockadeforthetreatmentofgastriccancer