Cargando…

Medication audit and feedback by a clinical pharmacist decrease medication errors at the PICU: An interrupted time series analysis

OBJECTIVE: Medication errors (MEs) are one of the most frequently occurring types of adverse events in hospitalized patients and potentially more harmful in children than in adults. To increase medication safety, we studied the effect of structured medication audit and feedback by a clinical pharmac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maaskant, Jolanda M., Tio, Marieke A., van Hest, Reinier M., Vermeulen, Hester, Geukers, Vincent G.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6200092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30623062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.23
_version_ 1783365272543952896
author Maaskant, Jolanda M.
Tio, Marieke A.
van Hest, Reinier M.
Vermeulen, Hester
Geukers, Vincent G.M.
author_facet Maaskant, Jolanda M.
Tio, Marieke A.
van Hest, Reinier M.
Vermeulen, Hester
Geukers, Vincent G.M.
author_sort Maaskant, Jolanda M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Medication errors (MEs) are one of the most frequently occurring types of adverse events in hospitalized patients and potentially more harmful in children than in adults. To increase medication safety, we studied the effect of structured medication audit and feedback by a clinical pharmacist as part of the multidisciplinary team, on MEs in critically ill children. METHOD: We performed an interrupted time series analysis with 6 preintervention and 6 postintervention data collection points, in a tertiary pediatric intensive care unit. We included intensive care patients admitted during July to December 2013 (preintervention) and July to December 2014 (postintervention). The primary endpoint was the prevalence of MEs per 100 prescriptions. We reviewed the clinical records of the patients and the incident reporting system for MEs. If an ME was suspected, a pediatrician‐intensivist and a clinical pharmacist determined causality and preventability. They classified MEs as harmful according to the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention categories. RESULTS: We included 254 patients in the preintervention period and 230 patients in the postintervention period. We identified 153 MEs in the preintervention period, corresponding with 2.27 per 100 prescriptions, and 90 MEs in the postintervention period, corresponding with 1.71 per 100 prescriptions. Autoregressive integrated moving average analyses revealed a significant change in slopes between the preintervention and postintervention periods (β = −.21; 95% CI, −0.41 to −0.02; P = .04). We did not observe a significant decrease immediately after the start of the intervention (β = −.61; 95% CI, −1.31 to 0.08; P = .07). CONCLUSION: The implementation of a structured medication audit, followed by feedback by a clinical pharmacist as part of the multidisciplinary team, resulted in a significant reduction of MEs in a tertiary pediatric intensive care unit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6200092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62000922019-01-08 Medication audit and feedback by a clinical pharmacist decrease medication errors at the PICU: An interrupted time series analysis Maaskant, Jolanda M. Tio, Marieke A. van Hest, Reinier M. Vermeulen, Hester Geukers, Vincent G.M. Health Sci Rep Research Articles OBJECTIVE: Medication errors (MEs) are one of the most frequently occurring types of adverse events in hospitalized patients and potentially more harmful in children than in adults. To increase medication safety, we studied the effect of structured medication audit and feedback by a clinical pharmacist as part of the multidisciplinary team, on MEs in critically ill children. METHOD: We performed an interrupted time series analysis with 6 preintervention and 6 postintervention data collection points, in a tertiary pediatric intensive care unit. We included intensive care patients admitted during July to December 2013 (preintervention) and July to December 2014 (postintervention). The primary endpoint was the prevalence of MEs per 100 prescriptions. We reviewed the clinical records of the patients and the incident reporting system for MEs. If an ME was suspected, a pediatrician‐intensivist and a clinical pharmacist determined causality and preventability. They classified MEs as harmful according to the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention categories. RESULTS: We included 254 patients in the preintervention period and 230 patients in the postintervention period. We identified 153 MEs in the preintervention period, corresponding with 2.27 per 100 prescriptions, and 90 MEs in the postintervention period, corresponding with 1.71 per 100 prescriptions. Autoregressive integrated moving average analyses revealed a significant change in slopes between the preintervention and postintervention periods (β = −.21; 95% CI, −0.41 to −0.02; P = .04). We did not observe a significant decrease immediately after the start of the intervention (β = −.61; 95% CI, −1.31 to 0.08; P = .07). CONCLUSION: The implementation of a structured medication audit, followed by feedback by a clinical pharmacist as part of the multidisciplinary team, resulted in a significant reduction of MEs in a tertiary pediatric intensive care unit. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6200092/ /pubmed/30623062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.23 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Maaskant, Jolanda M.
Tio, Marieke A.
van Hest, Reinier M.
Vermeulen, Hester
Geukers, Vincent G.M.
Medication audit and feedback by a clinical pharmacist decrease medication errors at the PICU: An interrupted time series analysis
title Medication audit and feedback by a clinical pharmacist decrease medication errors at the PICU: An interrupted time series analysis
title_full Medication audit and feedback by a clinical pharmacist decrease medication errors at the PICU: An interrupted time series analysis
title_fullStr Medication audit and feedback by a clinical pharmacist decrease medication errors at the PICU: An interrupted time series analysis
title_full_unstemmed Medication audit and feedback by a clinical pharmacist decrease medication errors at the PICU: An interrupted time series analysis
title_short Medication audit and feedback by a clinical pharmacist decrease medication errors at the PICU: An interrupted time series analysis
title_sort medication audit and feedback by a clinical pharmacist decrease medication errors at the picu: an interrupted time series analysis
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6200092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30623062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.23
work_keys_str_mv AT maaskantjolandam medicationauditandfeedbackbyaclinicalpharmacistdecreasemedicationerrorsatthepicuaninterruptedtimeseriesanalysis
AT tiomariekea medicationauditandfeedbackbyaclinicalpharmacistdecreasemedicationerrorsatthepicuaninterruptedtimeseriesanalysis
AT vanhestreinierm medicationauditandfeedbackbyaclinicalpharmacistdecreasemedicationerrorsatthepicuaninterruptedtimeseriesanalysis
AT vermeulenhester medicationauditandfeedbackbyaclinicalpharmacistdecreasemedicationerrorsatthepicuaninterruptedtimeseriesanalysis
AT geukersvincentgm medicationauditandfeedbackbyaclinicalpharmacistdecreasemedicationerrorsatthepicuaninterruptedtimeseriesanalysis