Cargando…

The temporal modulation structure of illiterate versus literate adult speech

The temporal modulation structure of speech plays a key role in neural encoding of the speech signal. Amplitude modulations (AMs, quasi-rhythmic changes in signal energy or intensity) in speech are encoded by neuronal oscillations (rhythmic variations in neural excitability in large cell networks) t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Araújo, João, Flanagan, Sheila, Castro-Caldas, Alexandre, Goswami, Usha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6200213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30356281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205224
_version_ 1783365290807001088
author Araújo, João
Flanagan, Sheila
Castro-Caldas, Alexandre
Goswami, Usha
author_facet Araújo, João
Flanagan, Sheila
Castro-Caldas, Alexandre
Goswami, Usha
author_sort Araújo, João
collection PubMed
description The temporal modulation structure of speech plays a key role in neural encoding of the speech signal. Amplitude modulations (AMs, quasi-rhythmic changes in signal energy or intensity) in speech are encoded by neuronal oscillations (rhythmic variations in neural excitability in large cell networks) that oscillate at matching temporal rates. To date, however, all neural studies have investigated adult-directed speech (ADS) as produced and perceived by highly literate adults. Whether temporal features of ADS vary with the skills of the speaker, for example literacy skills, is currently unknown. Here we analyse the temporal structure of ADS spoken by illiterate, low literate (≤ 4 years of literacy) and highly literate (≥ 12 years of literacy) adults. We find that illiterates produce speech differently. Spontaneous conversational speech produced by illiterate adults showed significantly less synchronised coupling between AM bands (less phase synchronisation) than conversational speech produced by low literate and highly literate adults, and contained significantly fewer syllables per second. There was also a significant relationship between years of literacy and the amount of theta-band energy in conversational speech. When asked to produce rhythmic proverbs learned in childhood, all groups could produce speech with similar AM phase synchronisation, suggesting that the differences in spontaneous conversational speech were not caused by physiological constraints. The data suggest that the temporal modulation structure of spoken language changes with the acquisition of cultural skills like literacy that are usually a product of schooling. There is a cultural effect on the temporal modulation structure of spoken language.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6200213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62002132018-11-19 The temporal modulation structure of illiterate versus literate adult speech Araújo, João Flanagan, Sheila Castro-Caldas, Alexandre Goswami, Usha PLoS One Research Article The temporal modulation structure of speech plays a key role in neural encoding of the speech signal. Amplitude modulations (AMs, quasi-rhythmic changes in signal energy or intensity) in speech are encoded by neuronal oscillations (rhythmic variations in neural excitability in large cell networks) that oscillate at matching temporal rates. To date, however, all neural studies have investigated adult-directed speech (ADS) as produced and perceived by highly literate adults. Whether temporal features of ADS vary with the skills of the speaker, for example literacy skills, is currently unknown. Here we analyse the temporal structure of ADS spoken by illiterate, low literate (≤ 4 years of literacy) and highly literate (≥ 12 years of literacy) adults. We find that illiterates produce speech differently. Spontaneous conversational speech produced by illiterate adults showed significantly less synchronised coupling between AM bands (less phase synchronisation) than conversational speech produced by low literate and highly literate adults, and contained significantly fewer syllables per second. There was also a significant relationship between years of literacy and the amount of theta-band energy in conversational speech. When asked to produce rhythmic proverbs learned in childhood, all groups could produce speech with similar AM phase synchronisation, suggesting that the differences in spontaneous conversational speech were not caused by physiological constraints. The data suggest that the temporal modulation structure of spoken language changes with the acquisition of cultural skills like literacy that are usually a product of schooling. There is a cultural effect on the temporal modulation structure of spoken language. Public Library of Science 2018-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6200213/ /pubmed/30356281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205224 Text en © 2018 Araújo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Araújo, João
Flanagan, Sheila
Castro-Caldas, Alexandre
Goswami, Usha
The temporal modulation structure of illiterate versus literate adult speech
title The temporal modulation structure of illiterate versus literate adult speech
title_full The temporal modulation structure of illiterate versus literate adult speech
title_fullStr The temporal modulation structure of illiterate versus literate adult speech
title_full_unstemmed The temporal modulation structure of illiterate versus literate adult speech
title_short The temporal modulation structure of illiterate versus literate adult speech
title_sort temporal modulation structure of illiterate versus literate adult speech
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6200213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30356281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205224
work_keys_str_mv AT araujojoao thetemporalmodulationstructureofilliterateversusliterateadultspeech
AT flanagansheila thetemporalmodulationstructureofilliterateversusliterateadultspeech
AT castrocaldasalexandre thetemporalmodulationstructureofilliterateversusliterateadultspeech
AT goswamiusha thetemporalmodulationstructureofilliterateversusliterateadultspeech
AT araujojoao temporalmodulationstructureofilliterateversusliterateadultspeech
AT flanagansheila temporalmodulationstructureofilliterateversusliterateadultspeech
AT castrocaldasalexandre temporalmodulationstructureofilliterateversusliterateadultspeech
AT goswamiusha temporalmodulationstructureofilliterateversusliterateadultspeech