Cargando…

Structure and dynamics conspire in the evolution of affinity between intrinsically disordered proteins

In every established species, protein-protein interactions have evolved such that they are fit for purpose. However, the molecular details of the evolution of new protein-protein interactions are poorly understood. We have used nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to investigate the changes in st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jemth, Per, Karlsson, Elin, Vögeli, Beat, Guzovsky, Brenda, Andersson, Eva, Hultqvist, Greta, Dogan, Jakob, Güntert, Peter, Riek, Roland, Chi, Celestine N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Association for the Advancement of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6200366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30397651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4130
_version_ 1783365315137110016
author Jemth, Per
Karlsson, Elin
Vögeli, Beat
Guzovsky, Brenda
Andersson, Eva
Hultqvist, Greta
Dogan, Jakob
Güntert, Peter
Riek, Roland
Chi, Celestine N.
author_facet Jemth, Per
Karlsson, Elin
Vögeli, Beat
Guzovsky, Brenda
Andersson, Eva
Hultqvist, Greta
Dogan, Jakob
Güntert, Peter
Riek, Roland
Chi, Celestine N.
author_sort Jemth, Per
collection PubMed
description In every established species, protein-protein interactions have evolved such that they are fit for purpose. However, the molecular details of the evolution of new protein-protein interactions are poorly understood. We have used nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to investigate the changes in structure and dynamics during the evolution of a protein-protein interaction involving the intrinsically disordered CREBBP (CREB-binding protein) interaction domain (CID) and nuclear coactivator binding domain (NCBD) from the transcriptional coregulators NCOA (nuclear receptor coactivator) and CREBBP/p300, respectively. The most ancient low-affinity “Cambrian-like” [540 to 600 million years (Ma) ago] CID/NCBD complex contained less secondary structure and was more dynamic than the complexes from an evolutionarily younger “Ordovician-Silurian” fish ancestor (ca. 440 Ma ago) and extant human. The most ancient Cambrian-like CID/NCBD complex lacked one helix and several interdomain interactions, resulting in a larger solvent-accessible surface area. Furthermore, the most ancient complex had a high degree of millisecond-to-microsecond dynamics distributed along the entire sequences of both CID and NCBD. These motions were reduced in the Ordovician-Silurian CID/NCBD complex and further redistributed in the extant human CID/NCBD complex. Isothermal calorimetry experiments show that complex formation is enthalpically favorable and that affinity is modulated by a largely unfavorable entropic contribution to binding. Our data demonstrate how changes in structure and motion conspire to shape affinity during the evolution of a protein-protein complex and provide direct evidence for the role of structural, dynamic, and frustrational plasticity in the evolution of interactions between intrinsically disordered proteins.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6200366
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Association for the Advancement of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62003662018-11-05 Structure and dynamics conspire in the evolution of affinity between intrinsically disordered proteins Jemth, Per Karlsson, Elin Vögeli, Beat Guzovsky, Brenda Andersson, Eva Hultqvist, Greta Dogan, Jakob Güntert, Peter Riek, Roland Chi, Celestine N. Sci Adv Research Articles In every established species, protein-protein interactions have evolved such that they are fit for purpose. However, the molecular details of the evolution of new protein-protein interactions are poorly understood. We have used nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to investigate the changes in structure and dynamics during the evolution of a protein-protein interaction involving the intrinsically disordered CREBBP (CREB-binding protein) interaction domain (CID) and nuclear coactivator binding domain (NCBD) from the transcriptional coregulators NCOA (nuclear receptor coactivator) and CREBBP/p300, respectively. The most ancient low-affinity “Cambrian-like” [540 to 600 million years (Ma) ago] CID/NCBD complex contained less secondary structure and was more dynamic than the complexes from an evolutionarily younger “Ordovician-Silurian” fish ancestor (ca. 440 Ma ago) and extant human. The most ancient Cambrian-like CID/NCBD complex lacked one helix and several interdomain interactions, resulting in a larger solvent-accessible surface area. Furthermore, the most ancient complex had a high degree of millisecond-to-microsecond dynamics distributed along the entire sequences of both CID and NCBD. These motions were reduced in the Ordovician-Silurian CID/NCBD complex and further redistributed in the extant human CID/NCBD complex. Isothermal calorimetry experiments show that complex formation is enthalpically favorable and that affinity is modulated by a largely unfavorable entropic contribution to binding. Our data demonstrate how changes in structure and motion conspire to shape affinity during the evolution of a protein-protein complex and provide direct evidence for the role of structural, dynamic, and frustrational plasticity in the evolution of interactions between intrinsically disordered proteins. American Association for the Advancement of Science 2018-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6200366/ /pubmed/30397651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4130 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant use is not for commercial advantage and provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Jemth, Per
Karlsson, Elin
Vögeli, Beat
Guzovsky, Brenda
Andersson, Eva
Hultqvist, Greta
Dogan, Jakob
Güntert, Peter
Riek, Roland
Chi, Celestine N.
Structure and dynamics conspire in the evolution of affinity between intrinsically disordered proteins
title Structure and dynamics conspire in the evolution of affinity between intrinsically disordered proteins
title_full Structure and dynamics conspire in the evolution of affinity between intrinsically disordered proteins
title_fullStr Structure and dynamics conspire in the evolution of affinity between intrinsically disordered proteins
title_full_unstemmed Structure and dynamics conspire in the evolution of affinity between intrinsically disordered proteins
title_short Structure and dynamics conspire in the evolution of affinity between intrinsically disordered proteins
title_sort structure and dynamics conspire in the evolution of affinity between intrinsically disordered proteins
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6200366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30397651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4130
work_keys_str_mv AT jemthper structureanddynamicsconspireintheevolutionofaffinitybetweenintrinsicallydisorderedproteins
AT karlssonelin structureanddynamicsconspireintheevolutionofaffinitybetweenintrinsicallydisorderedproteins
AT vogelibeat structureanddynamicsconspireintheevolutionofaffinitybetweenintrinsicallydisorderedproteins
AT guzovskybrenda structureanddynamicsconspireintheevolutionofaffinitybetweenintrinsicallydisorderedproteins
AT anderssoneva structureanddynamicsconspireintheevolutionofaffinitybetweenintrinsicallydisorderedproteins
AT hultqvistgreta structureanddynamicsconspireintheevolutionofaffinitybetweenintrinsicallydisorderedproteins
AT doganjakob structureanddynamicsconspireintheevolutionofaffinitybetweenintrinsicallydisorderedproteins
AT guntertpeter structureanddynamicsconspireintheevolutionofaffinitybetweenintrinsicallydisorderedproteins
AT riekroland structureanddynamicsconspireintheevolutionofaffinitybetweenintrinsicallydisorderedproteins
AT chicelestinen structureanddynamicsconspireintheevolutionofaffinitybetweenintrinsicallydisorderedproteins