Cargando…

Comparison of transcatheter closure, mini-invasive closure, and open-heart surgical repair for treatment of perimembranous ventricular septal defects in children: A PRISMA-compliant network meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies

OBJECTIVE: Our study was aimed to comprehensively compare the relative efficacy, safety, and the cost of transcatheter closure, mini-invasive closure, and open-heart surgical repair to treat perimembranous ventricular septal defects (pmVSDs) in children using network meta-analysis method. METHODS: F...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yi, Kang, You, Tao, Ding, Zhao-hong, Hou, Xiao-dong, Liu, Xing-Guang, Wang, Xin-Kuan, Tian, Jin-hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6200539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30290623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012583
_version_ 1783365349130895360
author Yi, Kang
You, Tao
Ding, Zhao-hong
Hou, Xiao-dong
Liu, Xing-Guang
Wang, Xin-Kuan
Tian, Jin-hui
author_facet Yi, Kang
You, Tao
Ding, Zhao-hong
Hou, Xiao-dong
Liu, Xing-Guang
Wang, Xin-Kuan
Tian, Jin-hui
author_sort Yi, Kang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Our study was aimed to comprehensively compare the relative efficacy, safety, and the cost of transcatheter closure, mini-invasive closure, and open-heart surgical repair to treat perimembranous ventricular septal defects (pmVSDs) in children using network meta-analysis method. METHODS: Five databases were systematically searched including Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, PubMed, EMBASE.com, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from the starting date of each database to February 2017. Tools for assessing the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) were used to evaluate the risk of bias in observational studies and Cochrane Handbook version 5.1.0 was used for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data were analyzed using R-3.4.0 software and Review Manager 5.2. RESULTS: Three RCTs and 24 observational studies were included in our study. Network meta-analysis result demonstrated that transcatheter closure was the most effective treatment in terms of operative time [standardized mean difference (SMD) = −2.02, 95% confidence interval (CI): −3.92 to −0.12], major complications [odds ratio (OR) = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.30–0.91], ICU stay (SMD = −1.11, 95% CI = −2.13 to −0.08), and hospital stay (SMD = −1.81, 95% CI = −2.24 to −1.39). However, open-heart surgical repair showed a higher success rate of the procedure than transcatheter closure (OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.17–0.77).Statistical analysis result demonstrated that transcatheter closure had the best potential to lessen major complications, ICU stay, hospital stay, operative time, and significant residual shunt. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter closure has more benefit than mini-invasive closure and open-heart surgical repair to treat pmVSDs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6200539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62005392018-11-07 Comparison of transcatheter closure, mini-invasive closure, and open-heart surgical repair for treatment of perimembranous ventricular septal defects in children: A PRISMA-compliant network meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies Yi, Kang You, Tao Ding, Zhao-hong Hou, Xiao-dong Liu, Xing-Guang Wang, Xin-Kuan Tian, Jin-hui Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article OBJECTIVE: Our study was aimed to comprehensively compare the relative efficacy, safety, and the cost of transcatheter closure, mini-invasive closure, and open-heart surgical repair to treat perimembranous ventricular septal defects (pmVSDs) in children using network meta-analysis method. METHODS: Five databases were systematically searched including Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, PubMed, EMBASE.com, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from the starting date of each database to February 2017. Tools for assessing the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) were used to evaluate the risk of bias in observational studies and Cochrane Handbook version 5.1.0 was used for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data were analyzed using R-3.4.0 software and Review Manager 5.2. RESULTS: Three RCTs and 24 observational studies were included in our study. Network meta-analysis result demonstrated that transcatheter closure was the most effective treatment in terms of operative time [standardized mean difference (SMD) = −2.02, 95% confidence interval (CI): −3.92 to −0.12], major complications [odds ratio (OR) = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.30–0.91], ICU stay (SMD = −1.11, 95% CI = −2.13 to −0.08), and hospital stay (SMD = −1.81, 95% CI = −2.24 to −1.39). However, open-heart surgical repair showed a higher success rate of the procedure than transcatheter closure (OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.17–0.77).Statistical analysis result demonstrated that transcatheter closure had the best potential to lessen major complications, ICU stay, hospital stay, operative time, and significant residual shunt. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter closure has more benefit than mini-invasive closure and open-heart surgical repair to treat pmVSDs. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6200539/ /pubmed/30290623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012583 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Yi, Kang
You, Tao
Ding, Zhao-hong
Hou, Xiao-dong
Liu, Xing-Guang
Wang, Xin-Kuan
Tian, Jin-hui
Comparison of transcatheter closure, mini-invasive closure, and open-heart surgical repair for treatment of perimembranous ventricular septal defects in children: A PRISMA-compliant network meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies
title Comparison of transcatheter closure, mini-invasive closure, and open-heart surgical repair for treatment of perimembranous ventricular septal defects in children: A PRISMA-compliant network meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies
title_full Comparison of transcatheter closure, mini-invasive closure, and open-heart surgical repair for treatment of perimembranous ventricular septal defects in children: A PRISMA-compliant network meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies
title_fullStr Comparison of transcatheter closure, mini-invasive closure, and open-heart surgical repair for treatment of perimembranous ventricular septal defects in children: A PRISMA-compliant network meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of transcatheter closure, mini-invasive closure, and open-heart surgical repair for treatment of perimembranous ventricular septal defects in children: A PRISMA-compliant network meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies
title_short Comparison of transcatheter closure, mini-invasive closure, and open-heart surgical repair for treatment of perimembranous ventricular septal defects in children: A PRISMA-compliant network meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies
title_sort comparison of transcatheter closure, mini-invasive closure, and open-heart surgical repair for treatment of perimembranous ventricular septal defects in children: a prisma-compliant network meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6200539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30290623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012583
work_keys_str_mv AT yikang comparisonoftranscatheterclosureminiinvasiveclosureandopenheartsurgicalrepairfortreatmentofperimembranousventricularseptaldefectsinchildrenaprismacompliantnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedandobservationalstudies
AT youtao comparisonoftranscatheterclosureminiinvasiveclosureandopenheartsurgicalrepairfortreatmentofperimembranousventricularseptaldefectsinchildrenaprismacompliantnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedandobservationalstudies
AT dingzhaohong comparisonoftranscatheterclosureminiinvasiveclosureandopenheartsurgicalrepairfortreatmentofperimembranousventricularseptaldefectsinchildrenaprismacompliantnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedandobservationalstudies
AT houxiaodong comparisonoftranscatheterclosureminiinvasiveclosureandopenheartsurgicalrepairfortreatmentofperimembranousventricularseptaldefectsinchildrenaprismacompliantnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedandobservationalstudies
AT liuxingguang comparisonoftranscatheterclosureminiinvasiveclosureandopenheartsurgicalrepairfortreatmentofperimembranousventricularseptaldefectsinchildrenaprismacompliantnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedandobservationalstudies
AT wangxinkuan comparisonoftranscatheterclosureminiinvasiveclosureandopenheartsurgicalrepairfortreatmentofperimembranousventricularseptaldefectsinchildrenaprismacompliantnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedandobservationalstudies
AT tianjinhui comparisonoftranscatheterclosureminiinvasiveclosureandopenheartsurgicalrepairfortreatmentofperimembranousventricularseptaldefectsinchildrenaprismacompliantnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedandobservationalstudies