Cargando…

The Optimal Timing of Enterostomy Closure in Extremely Low Birth Weight Patients for Acute Abdomen

There are few reports on enterostomy closure (EC) timing for acute abdomen in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) patients. We retrospectively reviewed ELBW patients who underwent enterostomy formation (EF) and subsequent EC. We investigated baseline characteristics, surgical outcomes, and follow-up d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Hee-Beom, Han, Ji-Won, Youn, Joong Kee, Oh, Chaeyoun, Kim, Hyun-Young, Jung, Sung Eun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6200749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30356166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33351-9
_version_ 1783365383784235008
author Yang, Hee-Beom
Han, Ji-Won
Youn, Joong Kee
Oh, Chaeyoun
Kim, Hyun-Young
Jung, Sung Eun
author_facet Yang, Hee-Beom
Han, Ji-Won
Youn, Joong Kee
Oh, Chaeyoun
Kim, Hyun-Young
Jung, Sung Eun
author_sort Yang, Hee-Beom
collection PubMed
description There are few reports on enterostomy closure (EC) timing for acute abdomen in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) patients. We retrospectively reviewed ELBW patients who underwent enterostomy formation (EF) and subsequent EC. We investigated baseline characteristics, surgical outcomes, and follow-up data of 55 patients and analyzed optimal timing by age at EC, enterostomy duration, and body weight (Bwt) at EC. The minimum p-value approach (MPA) using the Chi-squared test was used to determine each cut-off value. Mean gestational age was 25(+3) weeks, while mean age and Bwt at EF were 10 days and 660 g. Enterostomy duration and Bwt at EC were 102 days and 2400 g. Fourteen surgical complications were related to EC. The MPA identified a cut-off of 2100 g (p = 0.039) at EC but no significant cut-off age or enterostomy duration. The 18 patients <2100 g had more enterostomy-related problems at EC than the >2100 g group (66.7% vs 10.8%, p < 0.001). No other characteristics were significantly different. Operation time, ventilator period, hospital stay, parenteral nutrition duration, and full feeding day were significantly longer in <2100 g patients. Follow-up Bwt did not differ (11.55 kg vs 13.95 kg, p = 0.324). Our findings suggest EC can be safely performed when Bwt is over 2100 g.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6200749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62007492018-10-25 The Optimal Timing of Enterostomy Closure in Extremely Low Birth Weight Patients for Acute Abdomen Yang, Hee-Beom Han, Ji-Won Youn, Joong Kee Oh, Chaeyoun Kim, Hyun-Young Jung, Sung Eun Sci Rep Article There are few reports on enterostomy closure (EC) timing for acute abdomen in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) patients. We retrospectively reviewed ELBW patients who underwent enterostomy formation (EF) and subsequent EC. We investigated baseline characteristics, surgical outcomes, and follow-up data of 55 patients and analyzed optimal timing by age at EC, enterostomy duration, and body weight (Bwt) at EC. The minimum p-value approach (MPA) using the Chi-squared test was used to determine each cut-off value. Mean gestational age was 25(+3) weeks, while mean age and Bwt at EF were 10 days and 660 g. Enterostomy duration and Bwt at EC were 102 days and 2400 g. Fourteen surgical complications were related to EC. The MPA identified a cut-off of 2100 g (p = 0.039) at EC but no significant cut-off age or enterostomy duration. The 18 patients <2100 g had more enterostomy-related problems at EC than the >2100 g group (66.7% vs 10.8%, p < 0.001). No other characteristics were significantly different. Operation time, ventilator period, hospital stay, parenteral nutrition duration, and full feeding day were significantly longer in <2100 g patients. Follow-up Bwt did not differ (11.55 kg vs 13.95 kg, p = 0.324). Our findings suggest EC can be safely performed when Bwt is over 2100 g. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6200749/ /pubmed/30356166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33351-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Yang, Hee-Beom
Han, Ji-Won
Youn, Joong Kee
Oh, Chaeyoun
Kim, Hyun-Young
Jung, Sung Eun
The Optimal Timing of Enterostomy Closure in Extremely Low Birth Weight Patients for Acute Abdomen
title The Optimal Timing of Enterostomy Closure in Extremely Low Birth Weight Patients for Acute Abdomen
title_full The Optimal Timing of Enterostomy Closure in Extremely Low Birth Weight Patients for Acute Abdomen
title_fullStr The Optimal Timing of Enterostomy Closure in Extremely Low Birth Weight Patients for Acute Abdomen
title_full_unstemmed The Optimal Timing of Enterostomy Closure in Extremely Low Birth Weight Patients for Acute Abdomen
title_short The Optimal Timing of Enterostomy Closure in Extremely Low Birth Weight Patients for Acute Abdomen
title_sort optimal timing of enterostomy closure in extremely low birth weight patients for acute abdomen
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6200749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30356166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33351-9
work_keys_str_mv AT yangheebeom theoptimaltimingofenterostomyclosureinextremelylowbirthweightpatientsforacuteabdomen
AT hanjiwon theoptimaltimingofenterostomyclosureinextremelylowbirthweightpatientsforacuteabdomen
AT younjoongkee theoptimaltimingofenterostomyclosureinextremelylowbirthweightpatientsforacuteabdomen
AT ohchaeyoun theoptimaltimingofenterostomyclosureinextremelylowbirthweightpatientsforacuteabdomen
AT kimhyunyoung theoptimaltimingofenterostomyclosureinextremelylowbirthweightpatientsforacuteabdomen
AT jungsungeun theoptimaltimingofenterostomyclosureinextremelylowbirthweightpatientsforacuteabdomen
AT yangheebeom optimaltimingofenterostomyclosureinextremelylowbirthweightpatientsforacuteabdomen
AT hanjiwon optimaltimingofenterostomyclosureinextremelylowbirthweightpatientsforacuteabdomen
AT younjoongkee optimaltimingofenterostomyclosureinextremelylowbirthweightpatientsforacuteabdomen
AT ohchaeyoun optimaltimingofenterostomyclosureinextremelylowbirthweightpatientsforacuteabdomen
AT kimhyunyoung optimaltimingofenterostomyclosureinextremelylowbirthweightpatientsforacuteabdomen
AT jungsungeun optimaltimingofenterostomyclosureinextremelylowbirthweightpatientsforacuteabdomen