Cargando…

The impact of radiation treatment planning technique on unplanned hospital admissions

PURPOSE: Treatment burdens and toxicities related to palliative radiation therapy (RT) may lead to unplanned hospital admissions (UHAs). The likelihood for these toxicities may be related to treatment technique. We compared rates of UHA between patients receiving nonconformal (2-dimensional) and con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Sanders, Ru, Meng, Moshier, Erin L., Mazumdar, Madhu, Ricks, Doran, Goldstein, Nathan E., Wisnivesky, Juan P., Dharmarajan, Kavita V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6200879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30370366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.06.006
_version_ 1783365415084228608
author Chang, Sanders
Ru, Meng
Moshier, Erin L.
Mazumdar, Madhu
Ricks, Doran
Goldstein, Nathan E.
Wisnivesky, Juan P.
Dharmarajan, Kavita V.
author_facet Chang, Sanders
Ru, Meng
Moshier, Erin L.
Mazumdar, Madhu
Ricks, Doran
Goldstein, Nathan E.
Wisnivesky, Juan P.
Dharmarajan, Kavita V.
author_sort Chang, Sanders
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Treatment burdens and toxicities related to palliative radiation therapy (RT) may lead to unplanned hospital admissions (UHAs). The likelihood for these toxicities may be related to treatment technique. We compared rates of UHA between patients receiving nonconformal (2-dimensional) and conformal (3-dimensional or higher) radiation treatments to bone metastases involving the vertebral column. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively analyzed patients treated with RT for bone metastases at a single tertiary care center between 2010 and 2017. We compared rates of RT-related UHA within 90 days of receiving radiation using Cox competing risk regression models. RESULTS: We identified 326 patients with bone metastases involving the vertebral column, 139 of whom received radiation by nonconformal technique and 187 by conformal technique. On multivariable analysis, conformal techniques were associated with a reduced risk of 90-day UHA (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-0.88). Other significant factors include hematologic cancer (HR: 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03-0.82) and baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score ≥2 (HR: 3.02; 95% CI, 1.05-8.69). CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of conformal (non-2-dimensional) radiation treatment plans may help reduce treatment-related toxicities and consequently UHAs after palliation of bone metastases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6200879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62008792018-10-26 The impact of radiation treatment planning technique on unplanned hospital admissions Chang, Sanders Ru, Meng Moshier, Erin L. Mazumdar, Madhu Ricks, Doran Goldstein, Nathan E. Wisnivesky, Juan P. Dharmarajan, Kavita V. Adv Radiat Oncol Palliative Care PURPOSE: Treatment burdens and toxicities related to palliative radiation therapy (RT) may lead to unplanned hospital admissions (UHAs). The likelihood for these toxicities may be related to treatment technique. We compared rates of UHA between patients receiving nonconformal (2-dimensional) and conformal (3-dimensional or higher) radiation treatments to bone metastases involving the vertebral column. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively analyzed patients treated with RT for bone metastases at a single tertiary care center between 2010 and 2017. We compared rates of RT-related UHA within 90 days of receiving radiation using Cox competing risk regression models. RESULTS: We identified 326 patients with bone metastases involving the vertebral column, 139 of whom received radiation by nonconformal technique and 187 by conformal technique. On multivariable analysis, conformal techniques were associated with a reduced risk of 90-day UHA (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-0.88). Other significant factors include hematologic cancer (HR: 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03-0.82) and baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score ≥2 (HR: 3.02; 95% CI, 1.05-8.69). CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of conformal (non-2-dimensional) radiation treatment plans may help reduce treatment-related toxicities and consequently UHAs after palliation of bone metastases. Elsevier 2018-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6200879/ /pubmed/30370366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.06.006 Text en © 2018 The Authors on behalf of the American Society for Radiation Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Palliative Care
Chang, Sanders
Ru, Meng
Moshier, Erin L.
Mazumdar, Madhu
Ricks, Doran
Goldstein, Nathan E.
Wisnivesky, Juan P.
Dharmarajan, Kavita V.
The impact of radiation treatment planning technique on unplanned hospital admissions
title The impact of radiation treatment planning technique on unplanned hospital admissions
title_full The impact of radiation treatment planning technique on unplanned hospital admissions
title_fullStr The impact of radiation treatment planning technique on unplanned hospital admissions
title_full_unstemmed The impact of radiation treatment planning technique on unplanned hospital admissions
title_short The impact of radiation treatment planning technique on unplanned hospital admissions
title_sort impact of radiation treatment planning technique on unplanned hospital admissions
topic Palliative Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6200879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30370366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.06.006
work_keys_str_mv AT changsanders theimpactofradiationtreatmentplanningtechniqueonunplannedhospitaladmissions
AT rumeng theimpactofradiationtreatmentplanningtechniqueonunplannedhospitaladmissions
AT moshiererinl theimpactofradiationtreatmentplanningtechniqueonunplannedhospitaladmissions
AT mazumdarmadhu theimpactofradiationtreatmentplanningtechniqueonunplannedhospitaladmissions
AT ricksdoran theimpactofradiationtreatmentplanningtechniqueonunplannedhospitaladmissions
AT goldsteinnathane theimpactofradiationtreatmentplanningtechniqueonunplannedhospitaladmissions
AT wisniveskyjuanp theimpactofradiationtreatmentplanningtechniqueonunplannedhospitaladmissions
AT dharmarajankavitav theimpactofradiationtreatmentplanningtechniqueonunplannedhospitaladmissions
AT changsanders impactofradiationtreatmentplanningtechniqueonunplannedhospitaladmissions
AT rumeng impactofradiationtreatmentplanningtechniqueonunplannedhospitaladmissions
AT moshiererinl impactofradiationtreatmentplanningtechniqueonunplannedhospitaladmissions
AT mazumdarmadhu impactofradiationtreatmentplanningtechniqueonunplannedhospitaladmissions
AT ricksdoran impactofradiationtreatmentplanningtechniqueonunplannedhospitaladmissions
AT goldsteinnathane impactofradiationtreatmentplanningtechniqueonunplannedhospitaladmissions
AT wisniveskyjuanp impactofradiationtreatmentplanningtechniqueonunplannedhospitaladmissions
AT dharmarajankavitav impactofradiationtreatmentplanningtechniqueonunplannedhospitaladmissions