Cargando…
A simulation study to assess the potential impact of developing normal tissue complication probability models with accumulated dose
PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze the potential clinical impact of the differences between planned and accumulated doses on the development and use of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty patients who were previously treated with stereotactic body ra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6200914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30370368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.05.003 |
_version_ | 1783365423386853376 |
---|---|
author | McCulloch, Molly M. Muenz, Daniel G. Schipper, Matthew J. Velec, Michael Dawson, Laura A. Brock, Kristy K. |
author_facet | McCulloch, Molly M. Muenz, Daniel G. Schipper, Matthew J. Velec, Michael Dawson, Laura A. Brock, Kristy K. |
author_sort | McCulloch, Molly M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze the potential clinical impact of the differences between planned and accumulated doses on the development and use of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty patients who were previously treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver cancer and for whom the accumulated dose was computed were assessed retrospectively. The linear quadratic equivalent dose at 2 Gy per fraction and generalized equivalent uniform dose were calculated for planned and accumulated doses. Stomach and duodenal Lyman-Kutcher-Burman NTCP models (α/β = 2.5; n = .09) were developed on the basis of planned and accumulated generalized equivalent uniform doses and the differences between the models assessed. In addition, the error in determining the probability of toxicity on the basis of the planned dose was evaluated by comparing planned doses in the NTCP model that were created from accumulated doses. RESULTS: The standard, planned-dose NTCP model overestimates toxicity risk for both the duodenal and stomach models at doses that are below approximately 20 Gy (6 fractions) and underestimates toxicity risk for doses above approximately 20 Gy (6 fractions). Building NTCP models with accumulated rather than planned doses changes the predicted risk by up to 16% (mean: 6%; standard deviation: 7%) for duodenal toxicity and 6% (mean: 2%; standard deviation: 2%) for stomach toxicity. For a protocol that plans a 10% iso-toxicity risk to the duodenum, a 15.7 Gy (6 fractions) maximum dose constraint would be necessary when using standard NTCP models on the basis of a planned dose and a 17.6 Gy (6 fractions) maximum dose would be allowed when using NTCP models on the basis of accumulated doses. CONCLUSIONS: Assuming that accumulated dose is a more accurate representation of the true delivered dose than the planned dose, this simulation study indicates the need for prospective clinical trials to evaluate the impact of building NTCP models on the basis of accumulated doses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6200914 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62009142018-10-26 A simulation study to assess the potential impact of developing normal tissue complication probability models with accumulated dose McCulloch, Molly M. Muenz, Daniel G. Schipper, Matthew J. Velec, Michael Dawson, Laura A. Brock, Kristy K. Adv Radiat Oncol Physics Contribution PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze the potential clinical impact of the differences between planned and accumulated doses on the development and use of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty patients who were previously treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver cancer and for whom the accumulated dose was computed were assessed retrospectively. The linear quadratic equivalent dose at 2 Gy per fraction and generalized equivalent uniform dose were calculated for planned and accumulated doses. Stomach and duodenal Lyman-Kutcher-Burman NTCP models (α/β = 2.5; n = .09) were developed on the basis of planned and accumulated generalized equivalent uniform doses and the differences between the models assessed. In addition, the error in determining the probability of toxicity on the basis of the planned dose was evaluated by comparing planned doses in the NTCP model that were created from accumulated doses. RESULTS: The standard, planned-dose NTCP model overestimates toxicity risk for both the duodenal and stomach models at doses that are below approximately 20 Gy (6 fractions) and underestimates toxicity risk for doses above approximately 20 Gy (6 fractions). Building NTCP models with accumulated rather than planned doses changes the predicted risk by up to 16% (mean: 6%; standard deviation: 7%) for duodenal toxicity and 6% (mean: 2%; standard deviation: 2%) for stomach toxicity. For a protocol that plans a 10% iso-toxicity risk to the duodenum, a 15.7 Gy (6 fractions) maximum dose constraint would be necessary when using standard NTCP models on the basis of a planned dose and a 17.6 Gy (6 fractions) maximum dose would be allowed when using NTCP models on the basis of accumulated doses. CONCLUSIONS: Assuming that accumulated dose is a more accurate representation of the true delivered dose than the planned dose, this simulation study indicates the need for prospective clinical trials to evaluate the impact of building NTCP models on the basis of accumulated doses. Elsevier 2018-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6200914/ /pubmed/30370368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.05.003 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Physics Contribution McCulloch, Molly M. Muenz, Daniel G. Schipper, Matthew J. Velec, Michael Dawson, Laura A. Brock, Kristy K. A simulation study to assess the potential impact of developing normal tissue complication probability models with accumulated dose |
title | A simulation study to assess the potential impact of developing normal tissue complication probability models with accumulated dose |
title_full | A simulation study to assess the potential impact of developing normal tissue complication probability models with accumulated dose |
title_fullStr | A simulation study to assess the potential impact of developing normal tissue complication probability models with accumulated dose |
title_full_unstemmed | A simulation study to assess the potential impact of developing normal tissue complication probability models with accumulated dose |
title_short | A simulation study to assess the potential impact of developing normal tissue complication probability models with accumulated dose |
title_sort | simulation study to assess the potential impact of developing normal tissue complication probability models with accumulated dose |
topic | Physics Contribution |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6200914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30370368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.05.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mccullochmollym asimulationstudytoassessthepotentialimpactofdevelopingnormaltissuecomplicationprobabilitymodelswithaccumulateddose AT muenzdanielg asimulationstudytoassessthepotentialimpactofdevelopingnormaltissuecomplicationprobabilitymodelswithaccumulateddose AT schippermatthewj asimulationstudytoassessthepotentialimpactofdevelopingnormaltissuecomplicationprobabilitymodelswithaccumulateddose AT velecmichael asimulationstudytoassessthepotentialimpactofdevelopingnormaltissuecomplicationprobabilitymodelswithaccumulateddose AT dawsonlauraa asimulationstudytoassessthepotentialimpactofdevelopingnormaltissuecomplicationprobabilitymodelswithaccumulateddose AT brockkristyk asimulationstudytoassessthepotentialimpactofdevelopingnormaltissuecomplicationprobabilitymodelswithaccumulateddose AT mccullochmollym simulationstudytoassessthepotentialimpactofdevelopingnormaltissuecomplicationprobabilitymodelswithaccumulateddose AT muenzdanielg simulationstudytoassessthepotentialimpactofdevelopingnormaltissuecomplicationprobabilitymodelswithaccumulateddose AT schippermatthewj simulationstudytoassessthepotentialimpactofdevelopingnormaltissuecomplicationprobabilitymodelswithaccumulateddose AT velecmichael simulationstudytoassessthepotentialimpactofdevelopingnormaltissuecomplicationprobabilitymodelswithaccumulateddose AT dawsonlauraa simulationstudytoassessthepotentialimpactofdevelopingnormaltissuecomplicationprobabilitymodelswithaccumulateddose AT brockkristyk simulationstudytoassessthepotentialimpactofdevelopingnormaltissuecomplicationprobabilitymodelswithaccumulateddose |