Cargando…

A simulation study to assess the potential impact of developing normal tissue complication probability models with accumulated dose

PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze the potential clinical impact of the differences between planned and accumulated doses on the development and use of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty patients who were previously treated with stereotactic body ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCulloch, Molly M., Muenz, Daniel G., Schipper, Matthew J., Velec, Michael, Dawson, Laura A., Brock, Kristy K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6200914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30370368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.05.003
_version_ 1783365423386853376
author McCulloch, Molly M.
Muenz, Daniel G.
Schipper, Matthew J.
Velec, Michael
Dawson, Laura A.
Brock, Kristy K.
author_facet McCulloch, Molly M.
Muenz, Daniel G.
Schipper, Matthew J.
Velec, Michael
Dawson, Laura A.
Brock, Kristy K.
author_sort McCulloch, Molly M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze the potential clinical impact of the differences between planned and accumulated doses on the development and use of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty patients who were previously treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver cancer and for whom the accumulated dose was computed were assessed retrospectively. The linear quadratic equivalent dose at 2 Gy per fraction and generalized equivalent uniform dose were calculated for planned and accumulated doses. Stomach and duodenal Lyman-Kutcher-Burman NTCP models (α/β = 2.5; n = .09) were developed on the basis of planned and accumulated generalized equivalent uniform doses and the differences between the models assessed. In addition, the error in determining the probability of toxicity on the basis of the planned dose was evaluated by comparing planned doses in the NTCP model that were created from accumulated doses. RESULTS: The standard, planned-dose NTCP model overestimates toxicity risk for both the duodenal and stomach models at doses that are below approximately 20 Gy (6 fractions) and underestimates toxicity risk for doses above approximately 20 Gy (6 fractions). Building NTCP models with accumulated rather than planned doses changes the predicted risk by up to 16% (mean: 6%; standard deviation: 7%) for duodenal toxicity and 6% (mean: 2%; standard deviation: 2%) for stomach toxicity. For a protocol that plans a 10% iso-toxicity risk to the duodenum, a 15.7 Gy (6 fractions) maximum dose constraint would be necessary when using standard NTCP models on the basis of a planned dose and a 17.6 Gy (6 fractions) maximum dose would be allowed when using NTCP models on the basis of accumulated doses. CONCLUSIONS: Assuming that accumulated dose is a more accurate representation of the true delivered dose than the planned dose, this simulation study indicates the need for prospective clinical trials to evaluate the impact of building NTCP models on the basis of accumulated doses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6200914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62009142018-10-26 A simulation study to assess the potential impact of developing normal tissue complication probability models with accumulated dose McCulloch, Molly M. Muenz, Daniel G. Schipper, Matthew J. Velec, Michael Dawson, Laura A. Brock, Kristy K. Adv Radiat Oncol Physics Contribution PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze the potential clinical impact of the differences between planned and accumulated doses on the development and use of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty patients who were previously treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver cancer and for whom the accumulated dose was computed were assessed retrospectively. The linear quadratic equivalent dose at 2 Gy per fraction and generalized equivalent uniform dose were calculated for planned and accumulated doses. Stomach and duodenal Lyman-Kutcher-Burman NTCP models (α/β = 2.5; n = .09) were developed on the basis of planned and accumulated generalized equivalent uniform doses and the differences between the models assessed. In addition, the error in determining the probability of toxicity on the basis of the planned dose was evaluated by comparing planned doses in the NTCP model that were created from accumulated doses. RESULTS: The standard, planned-dose NTCP model overestimates toxicity risk for both the duodenal and stomach models at doses that are below approximately 20 Gy (6 fractions) and underestimates toxicity risk for doses above approximately 20 Gy (6 fractions). Building NTCP models with accumulated rather than planned doses changes the predicted risk by up to 16% (mean: 6%; standard deviation: 7%) for duodenal toxicity and 6% (mean: 2%; standard deviation: 2%) for stomach toxicity. For a protocol that plans a 10% iso-toxicity risk to the duodenum, a 15.7 Gy (6 fractions) maximum dose constraint would be necessary when using standard NTCP models on the basis of a planned dose and a 17.6 Gy (6 fractions) maximum dose would be allowed when using NTCP models on the basis of accumulated doses. CONCLUSIONS: Assuming that accumulated dose is a more accurate representation of the true delivered dose than the planned dose, this simulation study indicates the need for prospective clinical trials to evaluate the impact of building NTCP models on the basis of accumulated doses. Elsevier 2018-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6200914/ /pubmed/30370368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.05.003 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Physics Contribution
McCulloch, Molly M.
Muenz, Daniel G.
Schipper, Matthew J.
Velec, Michael
Dawson, Laura A.
Brock, Kristy K.
A simulation study to assess the potential impact of developing normal tissue complication probability models with accumulated dose
title A simulation study to assess the potential impact of developing normal tissue complication probability models with accumulated dose
title_full A simulation study to assess the potential impact of developing normal tissue complication probability models with accumulated dose
title_fullStr A simulation study to assess the potential impact of developing normal tissue complication probability models with accumulated dose
title_full_unstemmed A simulation study to assess the potential impact of developing normal tissue complication probability models with accumulated dose
title_short A simulation study to assess the potential impact of developing normal tissue complication probability models with accumulated dose
title_sort simulation study to assess the potential impact of developing normal tissue complication probability models with accumulated dose
topic Physics Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6200914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30370368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.05.003
work_keys_str_mv AT mccullochmollym asimulationstudytoassessthepotentialimpactofdevelopingnormaltissuecomplicationprobabilitymodelswithaccumulateddose
AT muenzdanielg asimulationstudytoassessthepotentialimpactofdevelopingnormaltissuecomplicationprobabilitymodelswithaccumulateddose
AT schippermatthewj asimulationstudytoassessthepotentialimpactofdevelopingnormaltissuecomplicationprobabilitymodelswithaccumulateddose
AT velecmichael asimulationstudytoassessthepotentialimpactofdevelopingnormaltissuecomplicationprobabilitymodelswithaccumulateddose
AT dawsonlauraa asimulationstudytoassessthepotentialimpactofdevelopingnormaltissuecomplicationprobabilitymodelswithaccumulateddose
AT brockkristyk asimulationstudytoassessthepotentialimpactofdevelopingnormaltissuecomplicationprobabilitymodelswithaccumulateddose
AT mccullochmollym simulationstudytoassessthepotentialimpactofdevelopingnormaltissuecomplicationprobabilitymodelswithaccumulateddose
AT muenzdanielg simulationstudytoassessthepotentialimpactofdevelopingnormaltissuecomplicationprobabilitymodelswithaccumulateddose
AT schippermatthewj simulationstudytoassessthepotentialimpactofdevelopingnormaltissuecomplicationprobabilitymodelswithaccumulateddose
AT velecmichael simulationstudytoassessthepotentialimpactofdevelopingnormaltissuecomplicationprobabilitymodelswithaccumulateddose
AT dawsonlauraa simulationstudytoassessthepotentialimpactofdevelopingnormaltissuecomplicationprobabilitymodelswithaccumulateddose
AT brockkristyk simulationstudytoassessthepotentialimpactofdevelopingnormaltissuecomplicationprobabilitymodelswithaccumulateddose