Cargando…

Prognostic value of gastric cancer‐associated gene signatures: Evidence based on a meta‐analysis using integrated bioinformatics methods

Selecting differentially expressed genes (DEGs) based on integrated bioinformatics analyses has been used in previous studies to explore potential biomarkers in gastric cancer (GC) with microarray and RNA sequencing data. However, the genes obtained may be inaccurate because of noisy data and errors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Jun, Gao, Peng, Song, Yongxi, Sun, Jingxu, Chen, Xiaowan, Yu, Hong, Wang, Yu, Wang, Zhenning
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6201382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30133128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.13823
_version_ 1783365487098331136
author Wang, Jun
Gao, Peng
Song, Yongxi
Sun, Jingxu
Chen, Xiaowan
Yu, Hong
Wang, Yu
Wang, Zhenning
author_facet Wang, Jun
Gao, Peng
Song, Yongxi
Sun, Jingxu
Chen, Xiaowan
Yu, Hong
Wang, Yu
Wang, Zhenning
author_sort Wang, Jun
collection PubMed
description Selecting differentially expressed genes (DEGs) based on integrated bioinformatics analyses has been used in previous studies to explore potential biomarkers in gastric cancer (GC) with microarray and RNA sequencing data. However, the genes obtained may be inaccurate because of noisy data and errors, as well as insufficient clinical sample sizes. Thus, we aimed to find robust and strong DEGs with prognostic value for GC, where the robust rank aggregation method was employed to select significant DEGs from eight Gene Expression Omnibus data sets with a total of 140 up‐regulated and 206 down‐regulated genes. Network data mining was then used to screen hub genes, and 11 genes were filtered using Fisher's exact test. Based on these results, we built a prognostic signature with seven genes (FBN1,MMP1,PLAU,SPARC,COL1A2,COL2A1 and ATP4A) using stepwise multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression. According to the risk score for each patient, we found that high‐risk group patients had significantly worse survival results compared with those in the low‐risk group (log‐rank test P‐value < 0.001). This seven‐gene signature was then validated with an external data set. Thus, we established a signature based on seven DEGs with prognostic value for GC patients using multi‐steps bioinformatics methods, which may provide novel insights and potential biomarkers for prognosis, as well as possibly serving as new therapeutic targets in clinical applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6201382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62013822018-11-01 Prognostic value of gastric cancer‐associated gene signatures: Evidence based on a meta‐analysis using integrated bioinformatics methods Wang, Jun Gao, Peng Song, Yongxi Sun, Jingxu Chen, Xiaowan Yu, Hong Wang, Yu Wang, Zhenning J Cell Mol Med Short Communications Selecting differentially expressed genes (DEGs) based on integrated bioinformatics analyses has been used in previous studies to explore potential biomarkers in gastric cancer (GC) with microarray and RNA sequencing data. However, the genes obtained may be inaccurate because of noisy data and errors, as well as insufficient clinical sample sizes. Thus, we aimed to find robust and strong DEGs with prognostic value for GC, where the robust rank aggregation method was employed to select significant DEGs from eight Gene Expression Omnibus data sets with a total of 140 up‐regulated and 206 down‐regulated genes. Network data mining was then used to screen hub genes, and 11 genes were filtered using Fisher's exact test. Based on these results, we built a prognostic signature with seven genes (FBN1,MMP1,PLAU,SPARC,COL1A2,COL2A1 and ATP4A) using stepwise multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression. According to the risk score for each patient, we found that high‐risk group patients had significantly worse survival results compared with those in the low‐risk group (log‐rank test P‐value < 0.001). This seven‐gene signature was then validated with an external data set. Thus, we established a signature based on seven DEGs with prognostic value for GC patients using multi‐steps bioinformatics methods, which may provide novel insights and potential biomarkers for prognosis, as well as possibly serving as new therapeutic targets in clinical applications. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-08-22 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6201382/ /pubmed/30133128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.13823 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Foundation for Cellular and Molecular Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Communications
Wang, Jun
Gao, Peng
Song, Yongxi
Sun, Jingxu
Chen, Xiaowan
Yu, Hong
Wang, Yu
Wang, Zhenning
Prognostic value of gastric cancer‐associated gene signatures: Evidence based on a meta‐analysis using integrated bioinformatics methods
title Prognostic value of gastric cancer‐associated gene signatures: Evidence based on a meta‐analysis using integrated bioinformatics methods
title_full Prognostic value of gastric cancer‐associated gene signatures: Evidence based on a meta‐analysis using integrated bioinformatics methods
title_fullStr Prognostic value of gastric cancer‐associated gene signatures: Evidence based on a meta‐analysis using integrated bioinformatics methods
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic value of gastric cancer‐associated gene signatures: Evidence based on a meta‐analysis using integrated bioinformatics methods
title_short Prognostic value of gastric cancer‐associated gene signatures: Evidence based on a meta‐analysis using integrated bioinformatics methods
title_sort prognostic value of gastric cancer‐associated gene signatures: evidence based on a meta‐analysis using integrated bioinformatics methods
topic Short Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6201382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30133128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.13823
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjun prognosticvalueofgastriccancerassociatedgenesignaturesevidencebasedonametaanalysisusingintegratedbioinformaticsmethods
AT gaopeng prognosticvalueofgastriccancerassociatedgenesignaturesevidencebasedonametaanalysisusingintegratedbioinformaticsmethods
AT songyongxi prognosticvalueofgastriccancerassociatedgenesignaturesevidencebasedonametaanalysisusingintegratedbioinformaticsmethods
AT sunjingxu prognosticvalueofgastriccancerassociatedgenesignaturesevidencebasedonametaanalysisusingintegratedbioinformaticsmethods
AT chenxiaowan prognosticvalueofgastriccancerassociatedgenesignaturesevidencebasedonametaanalysisusingintegratedbioinformaticsmethods
AT yuhong prognosticvalueofgastriccancerassociatedgenesignaturesevidencebasedonametaanalysisusingintegratedbioinformaticsmethods
AT wangyu prognosticvalueofgastriccancerassociatedgenesignaturesevidencebasedonametaanalysisusingintegratedbioinformaticsmethods
AT wangzhenning prognosticvalueofgastriccancerassociatedgenesignaturesevidencebasedonametaanalysisusingintegratedbioinformaticsmethods