Cargando…
Prognostic value of gastric cancer‐associated gene signatures: Evidence based on a meta‐analysis using integrated bioinformatics methods
Selecting differentially expressed genes (DEGs) based on integrated bioinformatics analyses has been used in previous studies to explore potential biomarkers in gastric cancer (GC) with microarray and RNA sequencing data. However, the genes obtained may be inaccurate because of noisy data and errors...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6201382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30133128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.13823 |
_version_ | 1783365487098331136 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Jun Gao, Peng Song, Yongxi Sun, Jingxu Chen, Xiaowan Yu, Hong Wang, Yu Wang, Zhenning |
author_facet | Wang, Jun Gao, Peng Song, Yongxi Sun, Jingxu Chen, Xiaowan Yu, Hong Wang, Yu Wang, Zhenning |
author_sort | Wang, Jun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Selecting differentially expressed genes (DEGs) based on integrated bioinformatics analyses has been used in previous studies to explore potential biomarkers in gastric cancer (GC) with microarray and RNA sequencing data. However, the genes obtained may be inaccurate because of noisy data and errors, as well as insufficient clinical sample sizes. Thus, we aimed to find robust and strong DEGs with prognostic value for GC, where the robust rank aggregation method was employed to select significant DEGs from eight Gene Expression Omnibus data sets with a total of 140 up‐regulated and 206 down‐regulated genes. Network data mining was then used to screen hub genes, and 11 genes were filtered using Fisher's exact test. Based on these results, we built a prognostic signature with seven genes (FBN1,MMP1,PLAU,SPARC,COL1A2,COL2A1 and ATP4A) using stepwise multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression. According to the risk score for each patient, we found that high‐risk group patients had significantly worse survival results compared with those in the low‐risk group (log‐rank test P‐value < 0.001). This seven‐gene signature was then validated with an external data set. Thus, we established a signature based on seven DEGs with prognostic value for GC patients using multi‐steps bioinformatics methods, which may provide novel insights and potential biomarkers for prognosis, as well as possibly serving as new therapeutic targets in clinical applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6201382 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62013822018-11-01 Prognostic value of gastric cancer‐associated gene signatures: Evidence based on a meta‐analysis using integrated bioinformatics methods Wang, Jun Gao, Peng Song, Yongxi Sun, Jingxu Chen, Xiaowan Yu, Hong Wang, Yu Wang, Zhenning J Cell Mol Med Short Communications Selecting differentially expressed genes (DEGs) based on integrated bioinformatics analyses has been used in previous studies to explore potential biomarkers in gastric cancer (GC) with microarray and RNA sequencing data. However, the genes obtained may be inaccurate because of noisy data and errors, as well as insufficient clinical sample sizes. Thus, we aimed to find robust and strong DEGs with prognostic value for GC, where the robust rank aggregation method was employed to select significant DEGs from eight Gene Expression Omnibus data sets with a total of 140 up‐regulated and 206 down‐regulated genes. Network data mining was then used to screen hub genes, and 11 genes were filtered using Fisher's exact test. Based on these results, we built a prognostic signature with seven genes (FBN1,MMP1,PLAU,SPARC,COL1A2,COL2A1 and ATP4A) using stepwise multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression. According to the risk score for each patient, we found that high‐risk group patients had significantly worse survival results compared with those in the low‐risk group (log‐rank test P‐value < 0.001). This seven‐gene signature was then validated with an external data set. Thus, we established a signature based on seven DEGs with prognostic value for GC patients using multi‐steps bioinformatics methods, which may provide novel insights and potential biomarkers for prognosis, as well as possibly serving as new therapeutic targets in clinical applications. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-08-22 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6201382/ /pubmed/30133128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.13823 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Foundation for Cellular and Molecular Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short Communications Wang, Jun Gao, Peng Song, Yongxi Sun, Jingxu Chen, Xiaowan Yu, Hong Wang, Yu Wang, Zhenning Prognostic value of gastric cancer‐associated gene signatures: Evidence based on a meta‐analysis using integrated bioinformatics methods |
title | Prognostic value of gastric cancer‐associated gene signatures: Evidence based on a meta‐analysis using integrated bioinformatics methods |
title_full | Prognostic value of gastric cancer‐associated gene signatures: Evidence based on a meta‐analysis using integrated bioinformatics methods |
title_fullStr | Prognostic value of gastric cancer‐associated gene signatures: Evidence based on a meta‐analysis using integrated bioinformatics methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic value of gastric cancer‐associated gene signatures: Evidence based on a meta‐analysis using integrated bioinformatics methods |
title_short | Prognostic value of gastric cancer‐associated gene signatures: Evidence based on a meta‐analysis using integrated bioinformatics methods |
title_sort | prognostic value of gastric cancer‐associated gene signatures: evidence based on a meta‐analysis using integrated bioinformatics methods |
topic | Short Communications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6201382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30133128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.13823 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangjun prognosticvalueofgastriccancerassociatedgenesignaturesevidencebasedonametaanalysisusingintegratedbioinformaticsmethods AT gaopeng prognosticvalueofgastriccancerassociatedgenesignaturesevidencebasedonametaanalysisusingintegratedbioinformaticsmethods AT songyongxi prognosticvalueofgastriccancerassociatedgenesignaturesevidencebasedonametaanalysisusingintegratedbioinformaticsmethods AT sunjingxu prognosticvalueofgastriccancerassociatedgenesignaturesevidencebasedonametaanalysisusingintegratedbioinformaticsmethods AT chenxiaowan prognosticvalueofgastriccancerassociatedgenesignaturesevidencebasedonametaanalysisusingintegratedbioinformaticsmethods AT yuhong prognosticvalueofgastriccancerassociatedgenesignaturesevidencebasedonametaanalysisusingintegratedbioinformaticsmethods AT wangyu prognosticvalueofgastriccancerassociatedgenesignaturesevidencebasedonametaanalysisusingintegratedbioinformaticsmethods AT wangzhenning prognosticvalueofgastriccancerassociatedgenesignaturesevidencebasedonametaanalysisusingintegratedbioinformaticsmethods |