Cargando…

Clinical Profile of Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Included in the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

BACKGROUND: Medicare's Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program assesses financial penalties to hospitals based on risk‐standardized readmission rates after specific episodes of care, including acute myocardial infarction. Detailed information about the type of patients included in the penalty i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin, Lila M., Januzzi, James L., Thompson, Ryan W., Ferris, Timothy G., Singh, Jagmeet P., Bhambhani, Vijeta, Wasfy, Jason H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6201407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30369306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009339
_version_ 1783365493056339968
author Martin, Lila M.
Januzzi, James L.
Thompson, Ryan W.
Ferris, Timothy G.
Singh, Jagmeet P.
Bhambhani, Vijeta
Wasfy, Jason H.
author_facet Martin, Lila M.
Januzzi, James L.
Thompson, Ryan W.
Ferris, Timothy G.
Singh, Jagmeet P.
Bhambhani, Vijeta
Wasfy, Jason H.
author_sort Martin, Lila M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medicare's Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program assesses financial penalties to hospitals based on risk‐standardized readmission rates after specific episodes of care, including acute myocardial infarction. Detailed information about the type of patients included in the penalty is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Starting with administrative data from Medicare, we conducted physician‐adjudicated chart reviews of all patients considered 30‐day readmissions after acute myocardial infarction from July 2012 to June 2015. Of 197 readmissions, 68 (34.5%) received percutaneous coronary intervention and 18 (9.1%) underwent coronary artery bypass grafting on index hospitalization. The remaining 111 patients did not receive any intervention. Of the 197 patients, 56 patients (28.4%) were considered too high risk for invasive management, 23 (11.7%) had nonobstructive coronary artery disease on diagnostic catheterization and therefore no indication for revascularization, 19 patients had a type II myocardial infarction (9.6%) for which noninvasive, outpatient workup was recommended, and 13 (6.6%) declined further care. The most common readmission diagnoses were cardiac causes and noncardiac chest discomfort, infection, and gastrointestinal bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that more than a quarter of the patients included in the penalty do not receive revascularization either because of provider assessment of risk or patient preference, and nearly one tenth have type II myocardial infarction. As such, administrative codes for prohibitive procedural risk, patient‐initiated “do not resuscitate” status, or type II myocardial infarction may improve the risk‐adjustment of the metric. Furthermore, provider organizations seeking to reduce readmission rates should focus resources on the needs of these patients, such as care coordination, hospice services when requested by patients, and treatment of noncardiac conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6201407
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62014072018-10-31 Clinical Profile of Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Included in the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program Martin, Lila M. Januzzi, James L. Thompson, Ryan W. Ferris, Timothy G. Singh, Jagmeet P. Bhambhani, Vijeta Wasfy, Jason H. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Medicare's Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program assesses financial penalties to hospitals based on risk‐standardized readmission rates after specific episodes of care, including acute myocardial infarction. Detailed information about the type of patients included in the penalty is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Starting with administrative data from Medicare, we conducted physician‐adjudicated chart reviews of all patients considered 30‐day readmissions after acute myocardial infarction from July 2012 to June 2015. Of 197 readmissions, 68 (34.5%) received percutaneous coronary intervention and 18 (9.1%) underwent coronary artery bypass grafting on index hospitalization. The remaining 111 patients did not receive any intervention. Of the 197 patients, 56 patients (28.4%) were considered too high risk for invasive management, 23 (11.7%) had nonobstructive coronary artery disease on diagnostic catheterization and therefore no indication for revascularization, 19 patients had a type II myocardial infarction (9.6%) for which noninvasive, outpatient workup was recommended, and 13 (6.6%) declined further care. The most common readmission diagnoses were cardiac causes and noncardiac chest discomfort, infection, and gastrointestinal bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that more than a quarter of the patients included in the penalty do not receive revascularization either because of provider assessment of risk or patient preference, and nearly one tenth have type II myocardial infarction. As such, administrative codes for prohibitive procedural risk, patient‐initiated “do not resuscitate” status, or type II myocardial infarction may improve the risk‐adjustment of the metric. Furthermore, provider organizations seeking to reduce readmission rates should focus resources on the needs of these patients, such as care coordination, hospice services when requested by patients, and treatment of noncardiac conditions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6201407/ /pubmed/30369306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009339 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Martin, Lila M.
Januzzi, James L.
Thompson, Ryan W.
Ferris, Timothy G.
Singh, Jagmeet P.
Bhambhani, Vijeta
Wasfy, Jason H.
Clinical Profile of Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Included in the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program
title Clinical Profile of Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Included in the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program
title_full Clinical Profile of Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Included in the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program
title_fullStr Clinical Profile of Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Included in the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Profile of Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Included in the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program
title_short Clinical Profile of Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Included in the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program
title_sort clinical profile of acute myocardial infarction patients included in the hospital readmissions reduction program
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6201407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30369306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009339
work_keys_str_mv AT martinlilam clinicalprofileofacutemyocardialinfarctionpatientsincludedinthehospitalreadmissionsreductionprogram
AT januzzijamesl clinicalprofileofacutemyocardialinfarctionpatientsincludedinthehospitalreadmissionsreductionprogram
AT thompsonryanw clinicalprofileofacutemyocardialinfarctionpatientsincludedinthehospitalreadmissionsreductionprogram
AT ferristimothyg clinicalprofileofacutemyocardialinfarctionpatientsincludedinthehospitalreadmissionsreductionprogram
AT singhjagmeetp clinicalprofileofacutemyocardialinfarctionpatientsincludedinthehospitalreadmissionsreductionprogram
AT bhambhanivijeta clinicalprofileofacutemyocardialinfarctionpatientsincludedinthehospitalreadmissionsreductionprogram
AT wasfyjasonh clinicalprofileofacutemyocardialinfarctionpatientsincludedinthehospitalreadmissionsreductionprogram