Cargando…

Differential Effects of Levosimendan and Dobutamine on Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients With Heart Failure and Renal Impairment:A Randomized Double‐Blind Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: The management of the cardiorenal syndrome in advanced heart failure is challenging, and the role of inotropic drugs has not been fully defined. Our aim was to compare the renal effects of levosimendan versus dobutamine in patients with heart failure and renal impairment. METHODS AND RES...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lannemyr, Lukas, Ricksten, Sven‐Erik, Rundqvist, Bengt, Andersson, Bert, Bartfay, Sven‐Erik, Ljungman, Charlotta, Dahlberg, Pia, Bergh, Niklas, Hjalmarsson, Clara, Gilljam, Thomas, Bollano, Entela, Karason, Kristjan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6201411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30369310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.008455
_version_ 1783365493987475456
author Lannemyr, Lukas
Ricksten, Sven‐Erik
Rundqvist, Bengt
Andersson, Bert
Bartfay, Sven‐Erik
Ljungman, Charlotta
Dahlberg, Pia
Bergh, Niklas
Hjalmarsson, Clara
Gilljam, Thomas
Bollano, Entela
Karason, Kristjan
author_facet Lannemyr, Lukas
Ricksten, Sven‐Erik
Rundqvist, Bengt
Andersson, Bert
Bartfay, Sven‐Erik
Ljungman, Charlotta
Dahlberg, Pia
Bergh, Niklas
Hjalmarsson, Clara
Gilljam, Thomas
Bollano, Entela
Karason, Kristjan
author_sort Lannemyr, Lukas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The management of the cardiorenal syndrome in advanced heart failure is challenging, and the role of inotropic drugs has not been fully defined. Our aim was to compare the renal effects of levosimendan versus dobutamine in patients with heart failure and renal impairment. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a randomized double‐blind study, we assigned patients with chronic heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction <40%) and impaired renal function (glomerular filtration rate <80 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)) to receive either levosimendan (loading dose 12 μg/kg+0.1 μg/kg per minute) or dobutamine (7.5  μg/kg per minute) for 75 minutes. A pulmonary artery catheter was used for measurements of systemic hemodynamics, and a renal vein catheter was used to measure renal plasma flow by the infusion clearance technique for PAH (para‐aminohippurate) corrected by renal extraction of PAH. Filtration fraction was measured by renal extraction of chromium ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid. A total of 32 patients completed the study. Following treatment, the levosimendan and dobutamine groups displayed similar increases in renal blood flow (22% and 26%, respectively) with no significant differences between groups. Glomerular filtration rate increased by 22% in the levosimendan group but remained unchanged in the dobutamine group (P=0.012). Filtration fraction was not affected by levosimendan but decreased by 17% with dobutamine (P=0.045). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic heart failure and renal impairment, levosimendan increases glomerular filtration rate to a greater extent than dobutamine and thus may be the preferred inotropic agent for treating patients with the cardiorenal syndrome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02133105.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6201411
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62014112018-10-31 Differential Effects of Levosimendan and Dobutamine on Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients With Heart Failure and Renal Impairment:A Randomized Double‐Blind Controlled Trial Lannemyr, Lukas Ricksten, Sven‐Erik Rundqvist, Bengt Andersson, Bert Bartfay, Sven‐Erik Ljungman, Charlotta Dahlberg, Pia Bergh, Niklas Hjalmarsson, Clara Gilljam, Thomas Bollano, Entela Karason, Kristjan J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: The management of the cardiorenal syndrome in advanced heart failure is challenging, and the role of inotropic drugs has not been fully defined. Our aim was to compare the renal effects of levosimendan versus dobutamine in patients with heart failure and renal impairment. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a randomized double‐blind study, we assigned patients with chronic heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction <40%) and impaired renal function (glomerular filtration rate <80 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)) to receive either levosimendan (loading dose 12 μg/kg+0.1 μg/kg per minute) or dobutamine (7.5  μg/kg per minute) for 75 minutes. A pulmonary artery catheter was used for measurements of systemic hemodynamics, and a renal vein catheter was used to measure renal plasma flow by the infusion clearance technique for PAH (para‐aminohippurate) corrected by renal extraction of PAH. Filtration fraction was measured by renal extraction of chromium ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid. A total of 32 patients completed the study. Following treatment, the levosimendan and dobutamine groups displayed similar increases in renal blood flow (22% and 26%, respectively) with no significant differences between groups. Glomerular filtration rate increased by 22% in the levosimendan group but remained unchanged in the dobutamine group (P=0.012). Filtration fraction was not affected by levosimendan but decreased by 17% with dobutamine (P=0.045). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic heart failure and renal impairment, levosimendan increases glomerular filtration rate to a greater extent than dobutamine and thus may be the preferred inotropic agent for treating patients with the cardiorenal syndrome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02133105. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6201411/ /pubmed/30369310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.008455 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Lannemyr, Lukas
Ricksten, Sven‐Erik
Rundqvist, Bengt
Andersson, Bert
Bartfay, Sven‐Erik
Ljungman, Charlotta
Dahlberg, Pia
Bergh, Niklas
Hjalmarsson, Clara
Gilljam, Thomas
Bollano, Entela
Karason, Kristjan
Differential Effects of Levosimendan and Dobutamine on Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients With Heart Failure and Renal Impairment:A Randomized Double‐Blind Controlled Trial
title Differential Effects of Levosimendan and Dobutamine on Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients With Heart Failure and Renal Impairment:A Randomized Double‐Blind Controlled Trial
title_full Differential Effects of Levosimendan and Dobutamine on Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients With Heart Failure and Renal Impairment:A Randomized Double‐Blind Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Differential Effects of Levosimendan and Dobutamine on Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients With Heart Failure and Renal Impairment:A Randomized Double‐Blind Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Differential Effects of Levosimendan and Dobutamine on Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients With Heart Failure and Renal Impairment:A Randomized Double‐Blind Controlled Trial
title_short Differential Effects of Levosimendan and Dobutamine on Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients With Heart Failure and Renal Impairment:A Randomized Double‐Blind Controlled Trial
title_sort differential effects of levosimendan and dobutamine on glomerular filtration rate in patients with heart failure and renal impairment:a randomized double‐blind controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6201411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30369310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.008455
work_keys_str_mv AT lannemyrlukas differentialeffectsoflevosimendananddobutamineonglomerularfiltrationrateinpatientswithheartfailureandrenalimpairmentarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT rickstensvenerik differentialeffectsoflevosimendananddobutamineonglomerularfiltrationrateinpatientswithheartfailureandrenalimpairmentarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT rundqvistbengt differentialeffectsoflevosimendananddobutamineonglomerularfiltrationrateinpatientswithheartfailureandrenalimpairmentarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT anderssonbert differentialeffectsoflevosimendananddobutamineonglomerularfiltrationrateinpatientswithheartfailureandrenalimpairmentarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT bartfaysvenerik differentialeffectsoflevosimendananddobutamineonglomerularfiltrationrateinpatientswithheartfailureandrenalimpairmentarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT ljungmancharlotta differentialeffectsoflevosimendananddobutamineonglomerularfiltrationrateinpatientswithheartfailureandrenalimpairmentarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT dahlbergpia differentialeffectsoflevosimendananddobutamineonglomerularfiltrationrateinpatientswithheartfailureandrenalimpairmentarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT berghniklas differentialeffectsoflevosimendananddobutamineonglomerularfiltrationrateinpatientswithheartfailureandrenalimpairmentarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT hjalmarssonclara differentialeffectsoflevosimendananddobutamineonglomerularfiltrationrateinpatientswithheartfailureandrenalimpairmentarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT gilljamthomas differentialeffectsoflevosimendananddobutamineonglomerularfiltrationrateinpatientswithheartfailureandrenalimpairmentarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT bollanoentela differentialeffectsoflevosimendananddobutamineonglomerularfiltrationrateinpatientswithheartfailureandrenalimpairmentarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT karasonkristjan differentialeffectsoflevosimendananddobutamineonglomerularfiltrationrateinpatientswithheartfailureandrenalimpairmentarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial